FAILED: patch "[PATCH] tpm_crb: fix mapping of the buffers" failed to apply to 4.7-stable tree

From 422eac3f7deae34dbaffd08e03e27f37a5394a56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

The patch below does not apply to the 4.7-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 422eac3f7deae34dbaffd08e03e27f37a5394a56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:54:18 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] tpm_crb: fix mapping of the buffers

On my Lenovo x250 the following situation occurs:

[18697.813871] tpm_crb MSFT0101:00: can't request region for resource

[mem 0xacdff080-0xacdfffff]

The mapping of the control area overlaps the mapping of the command buffer. The control area is mapped over page, which is not right. It should mapped over sizeof(struct crb_control_area).

Fixing this issue unmasks another issue. Command and response buffers can overlap and they do interleave on this machine. According to the PTP specification the overlapping means that they are mapped to the same buffer.

The commit has been also on a Haswell NUC where things worked before applying this fix so that the both code paths for response buffer initialization are tested.

Cc [email protected]

Fixes 1bd047be37d9 ("tpm_crb: Use devm_ioremap_resource")

Signed-off-by Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>

drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c +28 -11

index 733cd0e20598..5afe6840030e 100644
@@ -259,7 +259,10 @@ static int crb_map_io(struct acpi_device *device, struct crb_priv *priv,
 	struct list_head resources;
 	struct resource io_res;
 	struct device *dev = &device->dev;
-	u64 pa;
+	u64 cmd_pa;
+	u32 cmd_size;
+	u64 rsp_pa;
+	u32 rsp_size;
 	int ret;
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resources);

@@ -280,22 +283,36 @@ static int crb_map_io(struct acpi_device *device, struct crb_priv *priv,
 		return PTR_ERR(priv->iobase);
 
 	priv->cca = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, buf->control_address,
-				0x1000);
+				sizeof(struct crb_control_area));
 	if (IS_ERR(priv->cca))
 		return PTR_ERR(priv->cca);
 
-	pa = ((u64) ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_pa_high) << 32) |
-	      (u64) ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_pa_low);
-	priv->cmd = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, pa,
-				ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_size));
+	cmd_pa = ((u64) ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_pa_high) << 32) |
+		  (u64) ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_pa_low);
+	cmd_size = ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_size);
+	priv->cmd = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, cmd_pa, cmd_size);
 	if (IS_ERR(priv->cmd))
 		return PTR_ERR(priv->cmd);
 
-	memcpy_fromio(&pa, &priv->cca->rsp_pa, 8);
-	pa = le64_to_cpu(pa);
-	priv->rsp = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, pa,
-				ioread32(&priv->cca->rsp_size));
-	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(priv->rsp);
+	memcpy_fromio(&rsp_pa, &priv->cca->rsp_pa, 8);
+	rsp_pa = le64_to_cpu(rsp_pa);
+	rsp_size = ioread32(&priv->cca->rsp_size);
+
+	if (cmd_pa != rsp_pa) {
+		priv->rsp = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, rsp_pa, rsp_size);
+		return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(priv->rsp);
+	}
+
+	/* According to the PTP specification, overlapping command and response
+	 * buffer sizes must be identical.
+	 */
+	if (cmd_size != rsp_size) {
+		dev_err(dev, FW_BUG "overlapping command and response buffer sizes are not identical");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	priv->rsp = priv->cmd;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)