f2fs: fix to set superblock dirty correctly
Chao Yu
maintainerPATCH v2 1/1 f2fs: fix to set superblock dirty correctly
From: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
tests/generic/251 of fstest suit complains us with below message:
------------[ cut here ]------------ invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP CPU: 2 PID: 7698 Comm: fstrim Tainted: G O 4.7.0+ #21
task: e9f4e000 task.stack: e7262000
EIP: 0060:[<f89fcefe>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 2 EIP is at write_checkpoint+0xfde/0x1020 [f2fs]
EAX: f33eb300 EBX: eecac310 ECX: 00000001 EDX: ffff0001
ESI: eecac000 EDI: eecac5f0 EBP: e7263dec ESP: e7263d18
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
CR0: 80050033 CR2: b76ab01c CR3: 2eb89de0 CR4: 000406f0
Stack: 00000001 a220fb7b e9f4e000 00000002 419ff2d3 b3a05151 00000002 e9f4e5d8 e9f4e000 419ff2d3 b3a05151 eecac310 c10b8154 b3a05151 419ff2d3 c10b78bd e9f4e000 e9f4e000 e9f4e5d8 00000001 e9f4e000 ec409000 eecac2cc eecac288 Call Trace: [<c10b8154>] ? __lock_acquire+0x3c4/0x760 [<c10b78bd>] ? mark_held_locks+0x5d/0x80 [<f8a10632>] f2fs_trim_fs+0x1c2/0x2e0 [f2fs] [<f89e9f56>] f2fs_ioctl+0x6b6/0x10b0 [f2fs] [<c13d51df>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0xf/0x20 [<c10b4281>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x91/0x120 [<f89e98a0>] ? __exchange_data_block+0xd30/0xd30 [f2fs] [<c120b2e1>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x81/0x7f0 [<c11d57c5>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x245/0x2e0 [<c1217840>] ? get_unused_fd_flags+0x40/0x40 [<c1206eec>] ? putname+0x4c/0x50 [<c11f631e>] ? do_sys_open+0x16e/0x1d0 [<c1001990>] ? do_fast_syscall_32+0x30/0x1c0 [<c13d51df>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0xf/0x20 [<c120baa8>] SyS_ioctl+0x58/0x80 [<c1001a01>] do_fast_syscall_32+0xa1/0x1c0 [<c178cc54>] sysenter_past_esp+0x45/0x74 EIP: [<f89fcefe>] write_checkpoint+0xfde/0x1020 [f2fs] SS:ESP 0068:e7263d18 ---[ end trace 4de95d7e6b3aa7c6 ]---
The reason is: with below call stack, we will encounter BUG_ON during doing fstrim.
Thread A Thread B
- write_checkpoint
- do_checkpoint
- f2fs_write_inode
- update_inode_page
- update_inode
- set_page_dirty
- f2fs_set_node_page_dirty
- inc_page_count
- percpu_counter_inc
- set_sbi_flag(SBI_IS_DIRTY)
- clear_sbi_flag(SBI_IS_DIRTY)
Thread C Thread D
- f2fs_write_node_page
- set_node_addr
- __set_nat_cache_dirty
- nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt++
- do_vfs_ioctl
- f2fs_ioctl
- f2fs_trim_fs
- write_checkpoint
- f2fs_bug_on(nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt)
Fix it by setting superblock dirty correctly in do_checkpoint and f2fs_write_node_page.
--- fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 8 ++++++++ fs/f2fs/node.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c +8 -0
@@ -1153,6 +1153,14 @@ static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)clear_prefree_segments (sbi, cpc);clear_sbi_flag (sbi,SBI_IS_DIRTY ); +/* +* redirty superblock if metadata like node page or inode cache is +* updated during writting checkpoint. +*/ +if (get_pages (sbi,F2FS_DIRTY_NODES ) || +get_pages (sbi,F2FS_DIRTY_IMETA )) +set_sbi_flag (sbi,SBI_IS_DIRTY ); +return 0 ; }
fs/f2fs/node.c +1 -0
@@ -1597,6 +1597,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_node_page(struct page *page, fio.old_blkaddr = ni.blk_addr;write_node_page (nid, &fio);set_node_addr (sbi, &ni, fio.new_blkaddr,is_fsync_dnode (page)); +set_sbi_flag (sbi,SBI_IS_DIRTY );dec_page_count (sbi,F2FS_DIRTY_NODES );up_read (&sbi->node_write);
Signature · 1 line
2.7.2
Jaegeuk Kim
maintainerHi Chao,
Quoted 80 lines · Chao Yu
From: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
tests/generic/251 of fstest suit complains us with below message:
------------[ cut here ]------------ invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP CPU: 2 PID: 7698 Comm: fstrim Tainted: G O 4.7.0+ #21task:
e9f4e000task.stack:e7262000
EIP: 0060:[<f89fcefe>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 2 EIP is atwrite_checkpoint+0xfde/0x1020[f2fs]
EAX:f33eb300EBX:eecac310ECX: 00000001 EDX:ffff0001
ESI:eecac000EDI:eecac5f0EBP:e7263decESP:e7263d18
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
CR0: 80050033 CR2:b76ab01cCR3:2eb89de0CR4:000406f0Stack: 00000001 a220fb7b e9f4e000 00000002 419ff2d3 b3a05151 00000002 e9f4e5d8 e9f4e000 419ff2d3 b3a05151 eecac310 c10b8154 b3a05151 419ff2d3 c10b78bd e9f4e000 e9f4e000 e9f4e5d8 00000001 e9f4e000 ec409000 eecac2cc eecac288 Call Trace: [<c10b8154>] ? __lock_acquire+0x3c4/0x760 [<c10b78bd>] ? mark_held_locks+0x5d/0x80 [<f8a10632>] f2fs_trim_fs+0x1c2/0x2e0 [f2fs] [<f89e9f56>] f2fs_ioctl+0x6b6/0x10b0 [f2fs] [<c13d51df>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0xf/0x20 [<c10b4281>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x91/0x120 [<f89e98a0>] ? __exchange_data_block+0xd30/0xd30 [f2fs] [<c120b2e1>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x81/0x7f0 [<c11d57c5>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x245/0x2e0 [<c1217840>] ? get_unused_fd_flags+0x40/0x40 [<c1206eec>] ? putname+0x4c/0x50 [<c11f631e>] ? do_sys_open+0x16e/0x1d0 [<c1001990>] ? do_fast_syscall_32+0x30/0x1c0 [<c13d51df>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0xf/0x20 [<c120baa8>] SyS_ioctl+0x58/0x80 [<c1001a01>] do_fast_syscall_32+0xa1/0x1c0 [<c178cc54>] sysenter_past_esp+0x45/0x74 EIP: [<f89fcefe>] write_checkpoint+0xfde/0x1020 [f2fs] SS:ESP 0068:e7263d18 ---[ end trace 4de95d7e6b3aa7c6 ]---The reason is: with below call stack, we will encounter
BUG_ONduring doing fstrim.Thread A Thread B
-write_checkpoint
-do_checkpoint
-f2fs_write_inode
-update_inode_page
-update_inode
-set_page_dirty
-f2fs_set_node_page_dirty
-inc_page_count
-percpu_counter_inc
-set_sbi_flag(SBI_IS_DIRTY)
-clear_sbi_flag(SBI_IS_DIRTY)Thread C Thread D
-f2fs_write_node_page
-set_node_addr
-__set_nat_cache_dirty
- nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt++
-do_vfs_ioctl
-f2fs_ioctl
-f2fs_trim_fs
-write_checkpoint
-f2fs_bug_on(nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt)Fix it by setting superblock dirty correctly in
do_checkpointandf2fs_write_node_page.Signed-off-by Chao Yu <[email protected]>--- fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 8 ++++++++ fs/f2fs/node.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c +0
-0
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc) · line 1162
Quoted 10 lines
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c +7
-0@@ -1153,6 +1153,14 @@ static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)clear_prefree_segments (sbi, cpc);clear_sbi_flag (sbi,SBI_IS_DIRTY ); +/* +* redirty superblock if metadata like node page or inode cache is +* updated during writting checkpoint. +*/ +if (get_pages (sbi,F2FS_DIRTY_NODES ) || +get_pages (sbi,F2FS_DIRTY_IMETA )) +set_sbi_flag (sbi,SBI_IS_DIRTY );
How about adding f2fs_bug_on(get_pages(sb, F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS)); ?
fs/f2fs/node.c static int f2fs_write_node_page(struct page *page, · line 1600
Quoted 13 lines
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c +1
-0+return 0 ; }fs/f2fs/node.c +1
-0@@ -1597,6 +1597,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_node_page(struct page *page, fio.old_blkaddr = ni.blk_addr;write_node_page (nid, &fio);set_node_addr (sbi, &ni, fio.new_blkaddr,is_fsync_dnode (page)); +set_sbi_flag (sbi,SBI_IS_DIRTY );
It doesn't need to set this, right?
Thanks,
Quoted 5 lines
fs/f2fs/node.c +0
-0dec_page_count (sbi,F2FS_DIRTY_NODES );up_read (&sbi->node_write);Signature · 1 line
2.7.2
Hi Jaegeuk,
Quoted 86 lines · Jaegeuk Kim
Hi Chao,
Quoted 83 lines · Chao Yu
From: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
tests/generic/251 of fstest suit complains us with below message:
------------[ cut here ]------------ invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP CPU: 2 PID: 7698 Comm: fstrim Tainted: G O 4.7.0+ #21task:
e9f4e000task.stack:e7262000
EIP: 0060:[<f89fcefe>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 2 EIP is atwrite_checkpoint+0xfde/0x1020[f2fs]
EAX:f33eb300EBX:eecac310ECX: 00000001 EDX:ffff0001
ESI:eecac000EDI:eecac5f0EBP:e7263decESP:e7263d18
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
CR0: 80050033 CR2:b76ab01cCR3:2eb89de0CR4:000406f0Stack: 00000001 a220fb7b e9f4e000 00000002 419ff2d3 b3a05151 00000002 e9f4e5d8 e9f4e000 419ff2d3 b3a05151 eecac310 c10b8154 b3a05151 419ff2d3 c10b78bd e9f4e000 e9f4e000 e9f4e5d8 00000001 e9f4e000 ec409000 eecac2cc eecac288 Call Trace: [<c10b8154>] ? __lock_acquire+0x3c4/0x760 [<c10b78bd>] ? mark_held_locks+0x5d/0x80 [<f8a10632>] f2fs_trim_fs+0x1c2/0x2e0 [f2fs] [<f89e9f56>] f2fs_ioctl+0x6b6/0x10b0 [f2fs] [<c13d51df>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0xf/0x20 [<c10b4281>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x91/0x120 [<f89e98a0>] ? __exchange_data_block+0xd30/0xd30 [f2fs] [<c120b2e1>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x81/0x7f0 [<c11d57c5>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x245/0x2e0 [<c1217840>] ? get_unused_fd_flags+0x40/0x40 [<c1206eec>] ? putname+0x4c/0x50 [<c11f631e>] ? do_sys_open+0x16e/0x1d0 [<c1001990>] ? do_fast_syscall_32+0x30/0x1c0 [<c13d51df>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0xf/0x20 [<c120baa8>] SyS_ioctl+0x58/0x80 [<c1001a01>] do_fast_syscall_32+0xa1/0x1c0 [<c178cc54>] sysenter_past_esp+0x45/0x74 EIP: [<f89fcefe>] write_checkpoint+0xfde/0x1020 [f2fs] SS:ESP 0068:e7263d18 ---[ end trace 4de95d7e6b3aa7c6 ]---The reason is: with below call stack, we will encounter
BUG_ONduring doing fstrim.Thread A Thread B
-write_checkpoint
-do_checkpoint
-f2fs_write_inode
-update_inode_page
-update_inode
-set_page_dirty
-f2fs_set_node_page_dirty
-inc_page_count
-percpu_counter_inc
-set_sbi_flag(SBI_IS_DIRTY)
-clear_sbi_flag(SBI_IS_DIRTY)Thread C Thread D
-f2fs_write_node_page
-set_node_addr
-__set_nat_cache_dirty
- nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt++
-do_vfs_ioctl
-f2fs_ioctl
-f2fs_trim_fs
-write_checkpoint
-f2fs_bug_on(nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt)Fix it by setting superblock dirty correctly in
do_checkpointandf2fs_write_node_page.Signed-off-by Chao Yu <[email protected]>--- fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 8 ++++++++ fs/f2fs/node.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c +0
-0@@ -1153,6 +1153,14 @@ static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)clear_prefree_segments (sbi, cpc);clear_sbi_flag (sbi,SBI_IS_DIRTY );
Quoted 9 lines
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc) · line 1162
Quoted 7 lines
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c +7
-0+/* +* redirty superblock if metadata like node page or inode cache is +* updated during writting checkpoint. +*/ +if (get_pages (sbi,F2FS_DIRTY_NODES ) || +get_pages (sbi,F2FS_DIRTY_IMETA )) +set_sbi_flag (sbi,SBI_IS_DIRTY );How about adding
f2fs_bug_on(get_pages(sb, F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS)); ?
That's right, I will add it.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c +1
-0+return 0 ; }
Quoted 11 lines
fs/f2fs/node.c static int f2fs_write_node_page(struct page *page, · line 1600
Quoted 9 lines
fs/f2fs/node.c +1
-0@@ -1597,6 +1597,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_node_page(struct page *page, fio.old_blkaddr = ni.blk_addr;write_node_page (nid, &fio);set_node_addr (sbi, &ni, fio.new_blkaddr,is_fsync_dnode (page)); +set_sbi_flag (sbi,SBI_IS_DIRTY );It doesn't need to set this, right?
Agree, let me resend the patch. :)
Thanks,
Quoted 11 lines
Thanks,
Quoted 5 lines
fs/f2fs/node.c +0
-0dec_page_count (sbi,F2FS_DIRTY_NODES );up_read (&sbi->node_write);Signature · 1 line
2.7.2.