Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Patch "[PATCH 105/135] perf/x86/cqm: Fix CQM memory leak and notifier leak" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Sep 9, 2016

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer Applied
#0 lore raw

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

[PATCH 105/135] perf/x86/cqm: Fix CQM memory leak and notifier leak

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:

     0105-perf-x86-cqm-Fix-CQM-memory-leak-and-notifier-leak.patch

and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Quoted 1 line

From a134c91bceb0f44a23207876f9a1b580c3f894fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: Vikas Shivappa <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 15:32:08 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 105/135] perf/x86/cqm: Fix CQM memory leak and notifier leak

[ Upstream commit ada2f634cd50d050269b67b4e2966582387e7c27 ]

Fixes the hotcpu notifier leak and other global variable memory leaks during CQM (cache quality of service monitoring) initialization.

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_cqm.c |   43 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_cqm.c +32 -11
@@ -211,6 +211,20 @@ static void __put_rmid(u32 rmid)
 	list_add_tail(&entry->list, &cqm_rmid_limbo_lru);
 }
 
+static void cqm_cleanup(void)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	if (!cqm_rmid_ptrs)
+		return;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < cqm_max_rmid; i++)
+		kfree(cqm_rmid_ptrs[i]);
+
+	kfree(cqm_rmid_ptrs);
+	cqm_rmid_ptrs = NULL;
+}
+
 static int intel_cqm_setup_rmid_cache(void)
 {
 	struct cqm_rmid_entry *entry;
@@ -218,7 +232,7 @@ static int intel_cqm_setup_rmid_cache(vo
 	int r = 0;
 
 	nr_rmids = cqm_max_rmid + 1;
-	cqm_rmid_ptrs = kmalloc(sizeof(struct cqm_rmid_entry *) *
+	cqm_rmid_ptrs = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cqm_rmid_entry *) *
 				nr_rmids, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!cqm_rmid_ptrs)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -249,11 +263,9 @@ static int intel_cqm_setup_rmid_cache(vo
 	mutex_unlock(&cache_mutex);
 
 	return 0;
-fail:
-	while (r--)
-		kfree(cqm_rmid_ptrs[r]);
 
-	kfree(cqm_rmid_ptrs);
+fail:
+	cqm_cleanup();
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
 
@@ -1322,7 +1334,7 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_cqm
 
 static int __init intel_cqm_init(void)
 {
-	char *str, scale[20];
+	char *str = NULL, scale[20];
 	int i, cpu, ret;
 
 	if (!x86_match_cpu(intel_cqm_match))
@@ -1382,16 +1394,25 @@ static int __init intel_cqm_init(void)
 		cqm_pick_event_reader(i);
 	}
 
-	__perf_cpu_notifier(intel_cqm_cpu_notifier);
-
 	ret = perf_pmu_register(&intel_cqm_pmu, "intel_cqm", -1);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret) {
 		pr_err("Intel CQM perf registration failed: %d\n", ret);
-	else
-		pr_info("Intel CQM monitoring enabled\n");
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	pr_info("Intel CQM monitoring enabled\n");
 
+	/*
+	 * Register the hot cpu notifier once we are sure cqm
+	 * is enabled to avoid notifier leak.
+	 */
+	__perf_cpu_notifier(intel_cqm_cpu_notifier);
 out:
 	cpu_notifier_register_done();
+	if (ret) {
+		kfree(str);
+		cqm_cleanup();
+	}
 
 	return ret;
 }

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.4/0104-perf-x86-cqm-Fix-CQM-handling-of-grouping-events-int.patch queue-4.4/0105-perf-x86-cqm-Fix-CQM-memory-leak-and-notifier-leak.patch