Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Patch "ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Sep 9, 2016

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer Applied
#0 lore raw

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
ext4-avoid-deadlock-when-expanding-inode-size.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Quoted 1 line

From 2e81a4eeedcaa66e35f58b81e0755b87057ce392 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 12:38:55 -0400
Subject: ext4: avoid deadlock when expanding inode size

From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>

commit 2e81a4eeedcaa66e35f58b81e0755b87057ce392 upstream.

When we need to move xattrs into external xattr block, we call ext4_xattr_block_set() from ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea(). That may end up calling ext4_mark_inode_dirty() again which will recurse back into the inode expansion code leading to deadlocks.

Protect from recursion using EXT4_STATE_NO_EXPAND inode flag and move its management into ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() since its manipulation is safe there (due to xattr_sem) from possible races with ext4_xattr_set_handle() which plays with it as well.

---
 fs/ext4/inode.c |    2 --
 fs/ext4/xattr.c |   19 +++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
fs/ext4/inode.c +0 -2
@@ -5186,8 +5186,6 @@ int ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle_t *hand
 						      sbi->s_want_extra_isize,
 						      iloc, handle);
 			if (ret) {
-				ext4_set_inode_state(inode,
-						     EXT4_STATE_NO_EXPAND);
 				if (mnt_count !=
 					le16_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_mnt_count)) {
 					ext4_warning(inode->i_sb,
fs/ext4/xattr.c +13 -6
@@ -1269,12 +1269,14 @@ int ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea(struct in
 	int isize_diff;	/* How much do we need to grow i_extra_isize */
 
 	down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->xattr_sem);
+	/*
+	 * Set EXT4_STATE_NO_EXPAND to avoid recursion when marking inode dirty
+	 */
+	ext4_set_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_NO_EXPAND);
 retry:
 	isize_diff = new_extra_isize - EXT4_I(inode)->i_extra_isize;
-	if (EXT4_I(inode)->i_extra_isize >= new_extra_isize) {
-		up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->xattr_sem);
-		return 0;
-	}
+	if (EXT4_I(inode)->i_extra_isize >= new_extra_isize)
+		goto out;
 
 	header = IHDR(inode, raw_inode);
 	entry = IFIRST(header);
@@ -1299,8 +1301,7 @@ retry:
 				(void *)header, total_ino,
 				inode->i_sb->s_blocksize);
 		EXT4_I(inode)->i_extra_isize = new_extra_isize;
-		error = 0;
-		goto cleanup;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -1460,6 +1461,8 @@ retry:
 		kfree(bs);
 	}
 	brelse(bh);
+out:
+	ext4_clear_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_NO_EXPAND);
 	up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->xattr_sem);
 	return 0;
 
@@ -1471,6 +1474,10 @@ cleanup:
 	kfree(is);
 	kfree(bs);
 	brelse(bh);
+	/*
+	 * We deliberately leave EXT4_STATE_NO_EXPAND set here since inode
+	 * size expansion failed.
+	 */
 	up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->xattr_sem);
 	return error;
 }

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.4/ext4-fix-xattr-shifting-when-expanding-inodes-part-2.patch queue-4.4/ext4-fix-xattr-shifting-when-expanding-inodes.patch queue-4.4/ext4-avoid-deadlock-when-expanding-inode-size.patch queue-4.4/ext4-properly-align-shifted-xattrs-when-expanding-inodes.patch