Skip to contentSkip to conversation

GPLv2 for cifs-utils existing?

DISCUSSION [email protected] 2 participants 2 messages Sep 1, 2011 1 message not in the archive

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hello there,

I'm wondering whether the cifs-utils are available licenced under the GPLv2? I only found it under GPLv3. Maybe there are specific circumstances under which the licence is changeable?

Thanks,

-Simon Brenner.

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 1473841237.231172.1314882534664.JavaMail.ngmail-hrWuGRo80rTYJ3RwVI/HE3/75uz/[email protected]

#2 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:08:54 +0200 (CEST)…

Hello there,

I'm wondering whether the cifs-utils are available licenced under the GPLv2? I only found it under GPLv3. Maybe there are specific circumstances under which the licence is changeable?

Thanks,

-Simon Brenner.

No. It's GPLv3 and up.

We do occasionally dual-license some of the patches to make it easier to backport to older versions of the same tools in samba. The cifs-utils package itself has always been GPLv3 however.

Can you clarify why you'd like to see it as GPLv2?

Signature · 1 line
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>