Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Patch "exec: Ensure mm->user_ns contains the execed files" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 2 participants 5 messages Jan 4, 2017

Subsystems (4)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer Applied
#0 lore raw

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    exec: Ensure mm->user_ns contains the execed files

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
exec-ensure-mm-user_ns-contains-the-execed-files.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Quoted 1 line

From f84df2a6f268de584a201e8911384a2d244876e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:06:51 -0600
Subject: exec: Ensure mm->user_ns contains the execed files

From: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>

commit f84df2a6f268de584a201e8911384a2d244876e3 upstream.

When the user namespace support was merged the need to prevent ptrace from revealing the contents of an unreadable executable was overlooked.

Correct this oversight by ensuring that the executed file or files are in mm->user_ns, by adjusting mm->user_ns.

Use the new function privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid to see if the executable is a member of the user namespace, and as such if having CAP_SYS_PTRACE in the user namespace should allow tracing the executable. If not update mm->user_ns to the parent user namespace until an appropriate parent is found.

Fixes 9e4a36ece652 ("userns: Fail exec for suid and sgid binaries with ids outside our user namespace.")
---
 fs/exec.c                  |   19 +++++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/capability.h |    1 +
 kernel/capability.c        |   16 ++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
fs/exec.c +17 -2
@@ -1123,8 +1123,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(flush_old_exec);
 
 void would_dump(struct linux_binprm *bprm, struct file *file)
 {
-	if (inode_permission(file_inode(file), MAY_READ) < 0)
+	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
+	if (inode_permission(inode, MAY_READ) < 0) {
+		struct user_namespace *old, *user_ns;
 		bprm->interp_flags |= BINPRM_FLAGS_ENFORCE_NONDUMP;
+
+		/* Ensure mm->user_ns contains the executable */
+		user_ns = old = bprm->mm->user_ns;
+		while ((user_ns != &init_user_ns) &&
+		       !privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid(user_ns, inode))
+			user_ns = user_ns->parent;
+
+		if (old != user_ns) {
+			bprm->mm->user_ns = get_user_ns(user_ns);
+			put_user_ns(old);
+		}
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(would_dump);
 
@@ -1154,7 +1168,6 @@ void setup_new_exec(struct linux_binprm
 	    !gid_eq(bprm->cred->gid, current_egid())) {
 		current->pdeath_signal = 0;
 	} else {
-		would_dump(bprm, bprm->file);
 		if (bprm->interp_flags & BINPRM_FLAGS_ENFORCE_NONDUMP)
 			set_dumpable(current->mm, suid_dumpable);
 	}
@@ -1587,6 +1600,8 @@ static int do_execveat_common(int fd, st
 	if (retval < 0)
 		goto out;
 
+	would_dump(bprm, bprm->file);
+
 	retval = exec_binprm(bprm);
 	if (retval < 0)
 		goto out;
include/linux/capability.h +1 -0
@@ -247,6 +247,7 @@ static inline bool ns_capable_noaudit(st
 	return true;
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_MULTIUSER */
+extern bool privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid(struct user_namespace *ns, const struct inode *inode);
 extern bool capable_wrt_inode_uidgid(const struct inode *inode, int cap);
 extern bool file_ns_capable(const struct file *file, struct user_namespace *ns, int cap);
 
kernel/capability.c +14 -2
@@ -457,6 +457,19 @@ bool file_ns_capable(const struct file *
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(file_ns_capable);
 
 /**
+ * privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid - Do capabilities in the namespace work over the inode?
+ * @ns: The user namespace in question
+ * @inode: The inode in question
+ *
+ * Return true if the inode uid and gid are within the namespace.
+ */
+bool privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid(struct user_namespace *ns, const struct inode *inode)
+{
+	return kuid_has_mapping(ns, inode->i_uid) &&
+		kgid_has_mapping(ns, inode->i_gid);
+}
+
+/**
  * capable_wrt_inode_uidgid - Check nsown_capable and uid and gid mapped
  * @inode: The inode in question
  * @cap: The capability in question
@@ -469,7 +482,6 @@ bool capable_wrt_inode_uidgid(const stru
 {
 	struct user_namespace *ns = current_user_ns();
 
-	return ns_capable(ns, cap) && kuid_has_mapping(ns, inode->i_uid) &&
-		kgid_has_mapping(ns, inode->i_gid);
+	return ns_capable(ns, cap) && privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid(ns, inode);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(capable_wrt_inode_uidgid);

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.4/mm-add-a-user_ns-owner-to-mm_struct-and-fix-ptrace-permission-checks.patch queue-4.4/exec-ensure-mm-user_ns-contains-the-execed-files.patch queue-4.4/ptrace-capture-the-ptracer-s-creds-not-pt_ptrace_cap.patch

author maintainer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 11:05:53AM +0100, [email protected] wrote:

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    exec: Ensure mm->user_ns contains the execed files

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

Quoted 6 lines

The filename of the patch is:
exec-ensure-mm-user_ns-contains-the-execed-files.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Oops, nope, this broke the build too, now dropped.

thanks,

greg k-h

Quoted 128 lines
Quoted 1 line

From f84df2a6f268de584a201e8911384a2d244876e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:06:51 -0600
Subject: exec: Ensure mm->user_ns contains the execed files

From: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>

commit f84df2a6f268de584a201e8911384a2d244876e3 upstream.

When the user namespace support was merged the need to prevent ptrace from revealing the contents of an unreadable executable was overlooked.

Correct this oversight by ensuring that the executed file or files are in mm->user_ns, by adjusting mm->user_ns.

Use the new function privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid to see if the executable is a member of the user namespace, and as such if having CAP_SYS_PTRACE in the user namespace should allow tracing the executable. If not update mm->user_ns to the parent user namespace until an appropriate parent is found.

Fixes 9e4a36ece652 ("userns: Fail exec for suid and sgid binaries with ids outside our user namespace.")
---
 fs/exec.c                  |   19 +++++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/capability.h |    1 +
 kernel/capability.c        |   16 ++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
fs/exec.c +17 -2
@@ -1123,8 +1123,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(flush_old_exec);
 
 void would_dump(struct linux_binprm *bprm, struct file *file)
 {
-	if (inode_permission(file_inode(file), MAY_READ) < 0)
+	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
+	if (inode_permission(inode, MAY_READ) < 0) {
+		struct user_namespace *old, *user_ns;
 		bprm->interp_flags |= BINPRM_FLAGS_ENFORCE_NONDUMP;
+
+		/* Ensure mm->user_ns contains the executable */
+		user_ns = old = bprm->mm->user_ns;
+		while ((user_ns != &init_user_ns) &&
+		       !privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid(user_ns, inode))
+			user_ns = user_ns->parent;
+
+		if (old != user_ns) {
+			bprm->mm->user_ns = get_user_ns(user_ns);
+			put_user_ns(old);
+		}
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(would_dump);
 
@@ -1154,7 +1168,6 @@ void setup_new_exec(struct linux_binprm
 	    !gid_eq(bprm->cred->gid, current_egid())) {
 		current->pdeath_signal = 0;
 	} else {
-		would_dump(bprm, bprm->file);
 		if (bprm->interp_flags & BINPRM_FLAGS_ENFORCE_NONDUMP)
 			set_dumpable(current->mm, suid_dumpable);
 	}
@@ -1587,6 +1600,8 @@ static int do_execveat_common(int fd, st
 	if (retval < 0)
 		goto out;
 
+	would_dump(bprm, bprm->file);
+
 	retval = exec_binprm(bprm);
 	if (retval < 0)
 		goto out;
include/linux/capability.h +1 -0
@@ -247,6 +247,7 @@ static inline bool ns_capable_noaudit(st
 	return true;
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_MULTIUSER */
+extern bool privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid(struct user_namespace *ns, const struct inode *inode);
 extern bool capable_wrt_inode_uidgid(const struct inode *inode, int cap);
 extern bool file_ns_capable(const struct file *file, struct user_namespace *ns, int cap);
 
kernel/capability.c +14 -2
@@ -457,6 +457,19 @@ bool file_ns_capable(const struct file *
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(file_ns_capable);
 
 /**
+ * privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid - Do capabilities in the namespace work over the inode?
+ * @ns: The user namespace in question
+ * @inode: The inode in question
+ *
+ * Return true if the inode uid and gid are within the namespace.
+ */
+bool privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid(struct user_namespace *ns, const struct inode *inode)
+{
+	return kuid_has_mapping(ns, inode->i_uid) &&
+		kgid_has_mapping(ns, inode->i_gid);
+}
+
+/**
  * capable_wrt_inode_uidgid - Check nsown_capable and uid and gid mapped
  * @inode: The inode in question
  * @cap: The capability in question
@@ -469,7 +482,6 @@ bool capable_wrt_inode_uidgid(const stru
 {
 	struct user_namespace *ns = current_user_ns();
 
-	return ns_capable(ns, cap) && kuid_has_mapping(ns, inode->i_uid) &&
-		kgid_has_mapping(ns, inode->i_gid);
+	return ns_capable(ns, cap) && privileged_wrt_inode_uidgid(ns, inode);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(capable_wrt_inode_uidgid);

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.4/mm-add-a-user_ns-owner-to-mm_struct-and-fix-ptrace-permission-checks.patch queue-4.4/exec-ensure-mm-user_ns-contains-the-execed-files.patch queue-4.4/ptrace-capture-the-ptracer-s-creds-not-pt_ptrace_cap.patch --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

author maintainer
#2 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 8 lines · On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 11:05:53AM +0100, [email protected] wrote:

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    exec: Ensure mm->user_ns contains the execed files

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines

The filename of the patch is:
exec-ensure-mm-user_ns-contains-the-execed-files.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Oops, nope, this broke the build too, now dropped.

And I've now fixed it, sorry for the noise...

greg k-h

#3 lore raw
Quoted 14 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 13 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 12 lines · On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 11:05:53AM +0100, [email protected] wrote:

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    exec: Ensure mm->user_ns contains the execed files

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
exec-ensure-mm-user_ns-contains-the-execed-files.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Oops, nope, this broke the build too, now dropped.

And I've now fixed it, sorry for the noise...

When I have several patches that have dependencies like this is there something I can do to make backporting them easier?

Eric

author maintainer
#4 lore raw
Quoted 19 lines · Eric W. Biederman
Quoted 17 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 16 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 14 lines · On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 11:05:53AM +0100, [email protected] wrote:

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    exec: Ensure mm->user_ns contains the execed files

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
exec-ensure-mm-user_ns-contains-the-execed-files.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line

Oops, nope, this broke the build too, now dropped.

And I've now fixed it, sorry for the noise...

When I have several patches that have dependencies like this is there something I can do to make backporting them easier?

There wasn't a dependancy, only a simple .h file that needed to be included.

But generally you can put the git commit ids that are needed to be also included in the changelog text:

	cc: <[email protected]> # 4.1+  01234567 abc001122

or just email stable@vger and let us know.

thanks,

greg k-h