Patch "powercap/intel_rapl: fix and tidy up error handling" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
powercap/intel_rapl: fix and tidy up error handling
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
powercap-intel_rapl-fix-and-tidy-up-error-handling.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
cb43f81b8489dcb87555e16c17453f0a9fa690f2Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacob Pan <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:53:11 -0800
Subject: powercap/intel_rapl: fix and tidy up error handling
From: Jacob Pan <[email protected]>
commit cb43f81b8489dcb87555e16c17453f0a9fa690f2 upstream.
Commit e1399ba20eee ("powercap / RAPL: handle missing MSRs") added contraint_to_pl() function to return index into an array. But it can potentially return -EINVAL if powercap layer sends an out of range constraint ID. This patch adds sanity check.
Unnecessary RAPL domain pointer check is removed since it must be initialized before calling rapl_unit_xlate().
--- drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c +24 -1
@@ -442,6 +442,7 @@ static int contraint_to_pl(struct rapl_dreturn i; } } +pr_err ("Cannot find matching power limit for constraint %d\n" , cid);return -EINVAL ; }
@@ -457,6 +458,10 @@ static int set_power_limit(struct powercget_online_cpus (); rd =power_zone_to_rapl_domain (power_zone); id =contraint_to_pl (rd, cid); +if (id <0 ) { + ret = id; + goto set_exit; + } rp = rd->rp;
@@ -496,6 +501,11 @@ static int get_current_power_limit(strucget_online_cpus (); rd =power_zone_to_rapl_domain (power_zone); id =contraint_to_pl (rd, cid); +if (id <0 ) { + ret = id; + goto get_exit; + } +switch (rd->rpl[id].prim_id) {case PL1_ENABLE : prim =POWER_LIMIT1 ;
@@ -512,6 +522,7 @@ static int get_current_power_limit(strucelse *data = val; +get_exit:put_online_cpus ();return ret;
@@ -527,6 +538,10 @@ static int set_time_window(struct powercget_online_cpus (); rd =power_zone_to_rapl_domain (power_zone); id =contraint_to_pl (rd, cid); +if (id <0 ) { + ret = id; + goto set_time_exit; + }switch (rd->rpl[id].prim_id) {case PL1_ENABLE :
@@ -538,6 +553,8 @@ static int set_time_window(struct powercdefault : ret = -EINVAL ; } + +set_time_exit:put_online_cpus ();return ret; }
@@ -552,6 +569,10 @@ static int get_time_window(struct powercget_online_cpus (); rd =power_zone_to_rapl_domain (power_zone); id =contraint_to_pl (rd, cid); +if (id <0 ) { + ret = id; + goto get_time_exit; + }switch (rd->rpl[id].prim_id) {case PL1_ENABLE :
@@ -566,6 +587,8 @@ static int get_time_window(struct powerc }if (!ret) *data = val; + +get_time_exit:put_online_cpus ();return ret;
@@ -707,7 +730,7 @@ static u64 rapl_unit_xlate(struct rapl_dcase ENERGY_UNIT : scale =ENERGY_UNIT_SCALE ;/* per domain unit takes precedence */ -if (rd && rd->domain_energy_unit) +if (rd->domain_energy_unit) units = rd->domain_energy_unit;else units = rp->energy_unit;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.9/powercap-intel_rapl-fix-and-tidy-up-error-handling.patch