Patch "pwm: rockchip: State of PWM clock should synchronize with PWM enabled state" has been added to the 4.10-stable tree

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

pwm: rockchip: State of PWM clock should synchronize with PWM enabled state

to the 4.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
pwm-rockchip-state-of-pwm-clock-should-synchronize-with-pwm-enabled-state.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

From: David Wu <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 19:10:55 +0800
Subject: pwm: rockchip: State of PWM clock should synchronize with PWM enabled state

From: David Wu <[email protected]>

commit a900152b5c29aea8134cc7a4c5db25552b3cd8f7 upstream.

If the PWM was not enabled at U-Boot loader, PWM could not work for clock always disabled at PWM driver. The PWM clock is enabled at beginning of pwm_apply(), but disabled at end of pwm_apply().

If the PWM was enabled at U-Boot loader, PWM clock is always enabled unless closed by ATF. The pwm-backlight might turn off the power at early suspend, should disable PWM clock for saving power consume.

It is important to provide opportunity to enable/disable clock at PWM driver, the PWM consumer should ensure correct order to call PWM enable and disable, and PWM driver ensure state of PWM clock synchronized with PWM enabled state.

---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c |   40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

@@ -191,6 +191,28 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_config(struct pw
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int rockchip_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip,
+			 struct pwm_device *pwm,
+			 bool enable,
+			 enum pwm_polarity polarity)
+{
+	struct rockchip_pwm_chip *pc = to_rockchip_pwm_chip(chip);
+	int ret;
+
+	if (enable) {
+		ret = clk_enable(pc->clk);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	pc->data->set_enable(chip, pwm, enable, polarity);
+
+	if (!enable)
+		clk_disable(pc->clk);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int rockchip_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 			      struct pwm_state *state)
 {

@@ -207,22 +229,26 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_apply(struct pwm
 		return ret;
 
 	if (state->polarity != curstate.polarity && enabled) {
-		pc->data->set_enable(chip, pwm, false, state->polarity);
+		ret = rockchip_pwm_enable(chip, pwm, false, state->polarity);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out;
 		enabled = false;
 	}
 
 	ret = rockchip_pwm_config(chip, pwm, state->duty_cycle, state->period);
 	if (ret) {
 		if (enabled != curstate.enabled)
-			pc->data->set_enable(chip, pwm, !enabled,
-					     state->polarity);
-
+			rockchip_pwm_enable(chip, pwm, !enabled,
+				      state->polarity);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	if (state->enabled != enabled)
-		pc->data->set_enable(chip, pwm, state->enabled,
-				     state->polarity);
+	if (state->enabled != enabled) {
+		ret = rockchip_pwm_enable(chip, pwm, state->enabled,
+				    state->polarity);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Update the state with the real hardware, which can differ a bit

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.10/pwm-rockchip-state-of-pwm-clock-should-synchronize-with-pwm-enabled-state.patch