Patch "ftrace: Fix removing of second function probe" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

ftrace: Fix removing of second function probe

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
ftrace-fix-removing-of-second-function-probe.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 17:45:45 -0400
Subject: ftrace: Fix removing of second function probe

From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <[email protected]>

commit 82cc4fc2e70ec5baeff8f776f2773abc8b2cc0ae upstream.

When two function probes are added to set_ftrace_filter, and then one of them is removed, the update to the function locations is not performed, and the record keeping of the function states are corrupted, and causes an ftrace_bug() to occur.

This is easily reproducable by adding two probes, removing one, and then adding it back again.

 # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing
 # echo schedule:traceoff > set_ftrace_filter
 # echo do_IRQ:traceoff > set_ftrace_filter
 # echo \!do_IRQ:traceoff > /debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter
 # echo do_IRQ:traceoff > set_ftrace_filter

Causes:

 ------------[ cut here ]------------
 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1098 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2369 ftrace_get_addr_curr+0x143/0x220
 Modules linked in: [...]
 CPU: 2 PID: 1098 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.10.0-test+ #405
 Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF/339A, BIOS K01 v02.05 05/07/2012
 Call Trace:
  dump_stack+0x68/0x9f
  __warn+0x111/0x130
  ? trace_irq_work_interrupt+0xa0/0xa0
  warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
  ftrace_get_addr_curr+0x143/0x220
  ? __fentry__+0x10/0x10
  ftrace_replace_code+0xe3/0x4f0
  ? ftrace_int3_handler+0x90/0x90
  ? printk+0x99/0xb5
  ? 0xffffffff81000000
  ftrace_modify_all_code+0x97/0x110
  arch_ftrace_update_code+0x10/0x20
  ftrace_run_update_code+0x1c/0x60
  ftrace_run_modify_code.isra.48.constprop.62+0x8e/0xd0
  register_ftrace_function_probe+0x4b6/0x590
  ? ftrace_startup+0x310/0x310
  ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled.part.4+0x1a/0x30
  ? update_stack_state+0x88/0x110
  ? ftrace_regex_write.isra.43.part.44+0x1d3/0x320
  ? preempt_count_sub+0x18/0xd0
  ? mutex_lock_nested+0x104/0x800
  ? ftrace_regex_write.isra.43.part.44+0x1d3/0x320
  ? __unwind_start+0x1c0/0x1c0
  ? _mutex_lock_nest_lock+0x800/0x800
  ftrace_trace_probe_callback.isra.3+0xc0/0x130
  ? func_set_flag+0xe0/0xe0
  ? __lock_acquire+0x642/0x1790
  ? __might_fault+0x1e/0x20
  ? trace_get_user+0x398/0x470
  ? strcmp+0x35/0x60
  ftrace_trace_onoff_callback+0x48/0x70
  ftrace_regex_write.isra.43.part.44+0x251/0x320
  ? match_records+0x420/0x420
  ftrace_filter_write+0x2b/0x30
  __vfs_write+0xd7/0x330
  ? do_loop_readv_writev+0x120/0x120
  ? locks_remove_posix+0x90/0x2f0
  ? do_lock_file_wait+0x160/0x160
  ? __lock_is_held+0x93/0x100
  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x5c/0xb0
  ? preempt_count_sub+0x18/0xd0
  ? __sb_start_write+0x10a/0x230
  ? vfs_write+0x222/0x240
  vfs_write+0xef/0x240
  SyS_write+0xab/0x130
  ? SyS_read+0x130/0x130
  ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x182/0x280
  ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad
 RIP: 0033:0x7fe61c157c30
 RSP: 002b:00007ffe87890258 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: ffffffff8114a410 RCX: 00007fe61c157c30
 RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 000055814798f5e0 RDI: 0000000000000001
 RBP: ffff8800c9027f98 R08: 00007fe61c422740 R09: 00007fe61ca53700
 R10: 0000000000000073 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000558147a36400
 R13: 00007ffe8788f160 R14: 0000000000000024 R15: 00007ffe8788f15c
  ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0xc0/0x110
 ---[ end trace 99fa09b3d9869c2c ]---
 Bad trampoline accounting at: ffffffff81cc3b00 (do_IRQ+0x0/0x150)

---
 kernel/trace/ftrace.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

@@ -3736,23 +3736,24 @@ static void __enable_ftrace_function_pro
 	ftrace_probe_registered = 1;
 }
 
-static void __disable_ftrace_function_probe(void)
+static bool __disable_ftrace_function_probe(void)
 {
 	int i;
 
 	if (!ftrace_probe_registered)
-		return;
+		return false;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < FTRACE_FUNC_HASHSIZE; i++) {
 		struct hlist_head *hhd = &ftrace_func_hash[i];
 		if (hhd->first)
-			return;
+			return false;
 	}
 
 	/* no more funcs left */
 	ftrace_shutdown(&trace_probe_ops, 0);
 
 	ftrace_probe_registered = 0;
+	return true;
 }
 
 

@@ -3882,6 +3883,7 @@ static void
 __unregister_ftrace_function_probe(char *glob, struct ftrace_probe_ops *ops,
 				  void *data, int flags)
 {
+	struct ftrace_ops_hash old_hash_ops;
 	struct ftrace_func_entry *rec_entry;
 	struct ftrace_func_probe *entry;
 	struct ftrace_func_probe *p;

@@ -3893,6 +3895,7 @@ __unregister_ftrace_function_probe(char
 	struct hlist_node *tmp;
 	char str[KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN];
 	int i, ret;
+	bool disabled;
 
 	if (glob && (strcmp(glob, "*") == 0 || !strlen(glob)))
 		func_g.search = NULL;

@@ -3911,6 +3914,10 @@ __unregister_ftrace_function_probe(char
 
 	mutex_lock(&trace_probe_ops.func_hash->regex_lock);
 
+	old_hash_ops.filter_hash = old_hash;
+	/* Probes only have filters */
+	old_hash_ops.notrace_hash = NULL;
+
 	hash = alloc_and_copy_ftrace_hash(FTRACE_HASH_DEFAULT_BITS, *orig_hash);
 	if (!hash)
 		/* Hmm, should report this somehow */

@@ -3948,12 +3955,17 @@ __unregister_ftrace_function_probe(char
 		}
 	}
 	mutex_lock(&ftrace_lock);
-	__disable_ftrace_function_probe();
+	disabled = __disable_ftrace_function_probe();
 	/*
 	 * Remove after the disable is called. Otherwise, if the last
 	 * probe is removed, a null hash means *all enabled*.
 	 */
 	ret = ftrace_hash_move(&trace_probe_ops, 1, orig_hash, hash);
+
+	/* still need to update the function call sites */
+	if (ftrace_enabled && !disabled)
+		ftrace_run_modify_code(&trace_probe_ops, FTRACE_UPDATE_CALLS,
+				       &old_hash_ops);
 	synchronize_sched();
 	if (!ret)
 		free_ftrace_hash_rcu(old_hash);

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.9/ftrace-fix-removing-of-second-function-probe.patch