Patch "mwifiex: don't enable/disable IRQ 0 during suspend/resume" has been added to the 4.10-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
mwifiex: don't enable/disable IRQ 0 during suspend/resume
to the 4.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mwifiex-don-t-enable-disable-irq-0-during-suspend-resume.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
2447e2cad75239ae407c0f98acf12511354208c5Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Norris <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:55:25 -0800
Subject: mwifiex: don't enable/disable IRQ 0 during suspend/resume
From: Brian Norris <[email protected]>
commit 2447e2cad75239ae407c0f98acf12511354208c5 upstream.
If we don't have an out-of-band wakeup IRQ configured through DT (as most platforms don't), then we fall out of this function with 'irq_wakeup == 0'. Other code (e.g., mwifiex_disable_wake() and mwifiex_enable_wake()) treats 'irq_wakeup >= 0' as a valid IRQ, and so we end up calling {enable,disable}_irq() on IRQ 0.
That seems bad, so let's not do that.
Same problem as fixed in this patch:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9531693/
[PATCH v2 2/3] btmrvl: set irq_bt to -1 when failed to parse it
with the difference that:
(a) this one is actually a regression and
(b) this affects both device tree and non-device-tree systems
While fixing the regression, also drop the verbosity on the parse failure, so we don't see this when a DT node is present but doesn't have an interrupt property (this is perfectly legal):
[ 21.999000] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: fail to parse irq_wakeup from device tree
--- drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.c +4 -4
@@ -1569,13 +1569,13 @@ static void mwifiex_probe_of(struct mwifstruct device *dev = adapter->dev;if (!dev->of_node) -return ; + goto err_exit; adapter->dt_node = dev->of_node; adapter->irq_wakeup =irq_of_parse_and_map (adapter->dt_node,0 );if (!adapter->irq_wakeup) { -dev_info (dev,"fail to parse irq_wakeup from device tree\n" ); -return ; +dev_dbg (dev,"fail to parse irq_wakeup from device tree\n" ); + goto err_exit; } ret = devm_request_irq(dev, adapter->irq_wakeup,
@@ -1595,7 +1595,7 @@ static void mwifiex_probe_of(struct mwifreturn ; err_exit: - adapter->irq_wakeup =0 ; + adapter->irq_wakeup =-1 ; }/*
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.10/mwifiex-don-t-enable-disable-irq-0-during-suspend-resume.patch queue-4.10/mwifiex-debugfs-fix-sometimes-off-by-1-ssid-print.patch queue-4.10/mwifiex-set-adapter-dev-before-starting-to-use-mwifiex_dbg.patch