FAILED: patch "[PATCH] f2fs: fix out-of free segments" failed to apply to 4.11-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 4.11-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
Quoted 1 line
From
a788189305df9fa617e5e26dc0914d80d981cd57Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:51:57 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: fix out-of free segments
This patch also reverts d0db7703ac1 ("f2fs: do SSR in higher priority").
This patch fixes out of free segments caused by many small file creation by
1) mkfs -s 1 2G
2) mount
3) untar
- preoduce 60000 small files burstly
4) sync
- flush node pages
- flush imeta
Here, when we do f2fs_balance_fs, we missed # of imeta blocks, resulting in skipping to check has_not_enough_free_secs.
Another test is done by
1) mkfs -s 12 2G
2) mount
3) untar
- preoduce 60000 small files burstly
4) sync
- flush node pages
- flush imeta
In this case, this patch also fixes wrong block allocation under large section size.
fs/f2fs/data.c +2 -1
@@ -1472,7 +1472,8 @@ static int __write_data_page(struct page *page, bool *submitted, }unlock_page (page); -f2fs_balance_fs (sbi, need_balance_fs); +if (!S_ISDIR (inode->i_mode)) +f2fs_balance_fs (sbi, need_balance_fs);if (unlikely (f2fs_cp_error (sbi))) {f2fs_submit_merged_bio (sbi,DATA ,WRITE );
fs/f2fs/inode.c +2 -1
@@ -338,7 +338,8 @@ int f2fs_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)* We need to balance fs here to prevent from producing dirty node pages * during the urgent cleaning time when runing out of free sections. */ -if (update_inode_page (inode) && wbc && wbc->nr_to_write) +update_inode_page (inode); +if (wbc && wbc->nr_to_write)f2fs_balance_fs (sbi, true);return 0 ; }
fs/f2fs/segment.c +21 -5
@@ -388,11 +388,8 @@ void f2fs_balance_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool need) }#endif -if (!need) -return ; -/* balance_fs_bg is able to be pending */ -if (excess_cached_nats (sbi)) +if (need &&excess_cached_nats (sbi))f2fs_balance_fs_bg (sbi);/*
@@ -1639,6 +1636,17 @@ static void write_current_sum_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,f2fs_put_page (page,1 ); } +static int is_next_segment_free (struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,int type) +{ +struct curseg_info *curseg =CURSEG_I (sbi, type); +unsigned int segno = curseg->segno +1 ; +struct free_segmap_info *free_i =FREE_I (sbi); + +if (segno <MAIN_SEGS (sbi) && segno % sbi->segs_per_sec) +return !test_bit (segno, free_i->free_segmap); +return 0 ; +} +/* * Find a new segment from the free segments bitmap to right order * This function should be returned with success, otherwise BUG
@@ -1752,6 +1760,10 @@ static void reset_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type, int modified)static unsigned int __get_next_segno (struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,int type) { +/* if segs_per_sec is large than 1, we need to keep original policy. */ +if (sbi->segs_per_sec !=1 ) +return CURSEG_I (sbi, type)->segno; +if (type ==CURSEG_HOT_DATA ||IS_NODESEG (type))return 0 ;
@@ -1901,17 +1913,21 @@ static int get_ssr_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)static void allocate_segment_by_default (struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,int type,bool force) { +struct curseg_info *curseg =CURSEG_I (sbi, type); +if (force)new_curseg (sbi, type, true);else if (!is_set_ckpt_flags (sbi,CP_CRC_RECOVERY_FLAG ) && type ==CURSEG_WARM_NODE )new_curseg (sbi, type, false); +else if (curseg->alloc_type ==LFS &&is_next_segment_free (sbi, type)) +new_curseg (sbi, type, false);else if (need_SSR (sbi) &&get_ssr_segment (sbi, type))change_curseg (sbi, type, true);else new_curseg (sbi, type, false); -stat_inc_seg_type (sbi,CURSEG_I (sbi, type)); +stat_inc_seg_type (sbi, curseg); }void allocate_new_segments (struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)