Patch "net: ipv6: Compare lwstate in detecting duplicate nexthops" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
net: ipv6: Compare lwstate in detecting duplicate nexthops
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
net-ipv6-compare-lwstate-in-detecting-duplicate-nexthops.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
f06b7549b79e29a672336d4e134524373fb7a232Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Ahern <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:41:46 -0600
Subject: net: ipv6: Compare lwstate in detecting duplicate nexthops
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: David Ahern <[email protected]>
commit f06b7549b79e29a672336d4e134524373fb7a232 upstream.
Lennert reported a failure to add different mpls encaps in a multipath route:
$ ip -6 route add 1234::/16 \
nexthop encap mpls 10 via fe80::1 dev ens3 \
nexthop encap mpls 20 via fe80::1 dev ens3
RTNETLINK answers: File existsThe problem is that the duplicate nexthop detection does not compare lwtunnel configuration. Add it.
--- include/net/ip6_route.h | 8 ++++++++ net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c | 5 +---- net/ipv6/route.c | 8 +------- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
include/net/ip6_route.h +8 -0
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ struct route_info {#include <net/flow.h> #include <net/ip6_fib.h> #include <net/sock.h> +#include <net/lwtunnel.h> #include <linux/ip.h> #include <linux/ipv6.h> #include <linux/route.h>
@@ -208,4 +209,11 @@ static inline struct in6_addr *rt6_nexth return daddr; } +static inline bool rt6_duplicate_nexthop (struct rt6_info *a,struct rt6_info *b) +{ +return a->dst.dev == b->dst.dev && + a->rt6i_idev == b->rt6i_idev && +ipv6_addr_equal (&a->rt6i_gateway, &b->rt6i_gateway) && + !lwtunnel_cmp_encap (a->dst.lwtstate, b->dst.lwtstate); +}#endif
net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c +1 -4
@@ -767,10 +767,7 @@ static int fib6_add_rt2node(struct fib6_ goto next_iter; } -if (iter->dst.dev == rt->dst.dev && - iter->rt6i_idev == rt->rt6i_idev && -ipv6_addr_equal (&iter->rt6i_gateway, - &rt->rt6i_gateway)) { +if (rt6_duplicate_nexthop (iter, rt)) {if (rt->rt6i_nsiblings) rt->rt6i_nsiblings =0 ;if (!(iter->rt6i_flags &RTF_EXPIRES ))
net/ipv6/route.c +1 -7
@@ -2833,17 +2833,11 @@ static int ip6_route_info_append(struct struct rt6_info *rt, struct fib6_config *r_cfg) { struct rt6_nh *nh; -struct rt6_info *rtnh;int err = -EEXIST ;list_for_each_entry (nh, rt6_nh_list, next) {/* check if rt6_info already exists */ - rtnh = nh->rt6_info; - -if (rtnh->dst.dev == rt->dst.dev && - rtnh->rt6i_idev == rt->rt6i_idev && -ipv6_addr_equal (&rtnh->rt6i_gateway, - &rt->rt6i_gateway)) +if (rt6_duplicate_nexthop (nh->rt6_info, rt))return err; }
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.4/vrf-fix-bug_on-triggered-by-rx-when-destroying-a-vrf.patch queue-4.4/ipv6-avoid-unregistering-inet6_dev-for-loopback.patch queue-4.4/net-ipv6-compare-lwstate-in-detecting-duplicate-nexthops.patch