Patch "pstore: Make spinlock per zone instead of global" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
pstore: Make spinlock per zone instead of global
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
pstore-make-spinlock-per-zone-instead-of-global.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
109704492ef637956265ec2eb72ae7b3b39eb6f4Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joel Fernandes <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:34:00 -0700
Subject: pstore: Make spinlock per zone instead of global
From: Joel Fernandes <[email protected]>
commit 109704492ef637956265ec2eb72ae7b3b39eb6f4 upstream.
Currently pstore has a global spinlock for all zones. Since the zones are independent and modify different areas of memory, there's no need to have a global lock, so we should use a per-zone lock as introduced here. Also, when ramoops's ftrace use-case has a FTRACE_PER_CPU flag introduced later, which splits the ftrace memory area into a single zone per CPU, it will eliminate the need for locking. In preparation for this, make the locking optional.
--- fs/pstore/ram_core.c | 11 +++++------ include/linux/pstore_ram.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
fs/pstore/ram_core.c +5 -6
@@ -48,8 +48,6 @@ static inline size_t buffer_start(structreturn atomic_read (&prz->buffer->start); } -static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK (buffer_lock); -/* increase and wrap the start pointer, returning the old value */ static size_t buffer_start_add (struct persistent_ram_zone *prz,size_t a) {
@@ -57,7 +55,7 @@ static size_t buffer_start_add(struct peint new;unsigned long flags; -raw_spin_lock_irqsave (&buffer_lock, flags); +raw_spin_lock_irqsave (&prz->buffer_lock, flags); old =atomic_read (&prz->buffer->start); new = old + a;
@@ -65,7 +63,7 @@ static size_t buffer_start_add(struct pe new -= prz->buffer_size;atomic_set (&prz->buffer->start, new); -raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (&buffer_lock, flags); +raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (&prz->buffer_lock, flags);return old; }
@@ -77,7 +75,7 @@ static void buffer_size_add(struct persisize_t new;unsigned long flags; -raw_spin_lock_irqsave (&buffer_lock, flags); +raw_spin_lock_irqsave (&prz->buffer_lock, flags); old =atomic_read (&prz->buffer->size);if (old == prz->buffer_size)
@@ -89,7 +87,7 @@ static void buffer_size_add(struct persiatomic_set (&prz->buffer->size, new); exit: -raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (&buffer_lock, flags); +raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (&prz->buffer_lock, flags); } static void notrace persistent_ram_encode_rs8(struct persistent_ram_zone *prz,
@@ -493,6 +491,7 @@ static int persistent_ram_post_init(stru prz->buffer->sig = sig;persistent_ram_zap (prz); + prz->buffer_lock =__RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED (buffer_lock);return 0 ; }
include/linux/pstore_ram.h +1 -0
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ struct persistent_ram_zone {void *vaddr;struct persistent_ram_buffer *buffer;size_t buffer_size; +raw_spinlock_t buffer_lock;/* ECC correction */ char *par_buffer;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.9/pstore-make-spinlock-per-zone-instead-of-global.patch