Patch "packet: only test po->has_vnet_hdr once in packet_snd" has been added to the 4.13-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
packet: only test po->has_vnet_hdr once in packet_snd
to the 4.13-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
packet-only-test-po-has_vnet_hdr-once-in-packet_snd.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.13 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From foo@baz Mon Oct 9 09:32:35 CEST 2017
From: Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 12:20:17 -0400
Subject: packet: only test po->has_vnet_hdr once in packet_snd
From: Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit da7c9561015e93d10fe6aab73e9288e0d09d65a6 ]
Packet socket option po->has_vnet_hdr can be updated concurrently with other operations if no ring is attached.
Do not test the option twice in packet_snd, as the value may change in between calls. A race on setsockopt disable may cause a packet > mtu to be sent without having GSO options set.
--- net/packet/af_packet.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
net/packet/af_packet.c +3 -1
@@ -2842,6 +2842,7 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *socstruct virtio_net_hdr vnet_hdr = {0 };int offset =0 ;struct packet_sock *po =pkt_sk (sk); +bool has_vnet_hdr = false;int hlen, tlen, linear;int extra_len =0 ;
@@ -2885,6 +2886,7 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *soc err =packet_snd_vnet_parse (msg, &len, &vnet_hdr);if (err) goto out_unlock; + has_vnet_hdr = true; }if (unlikely (sock_flag (sk,SOCK_NOFCS ))) {
@@ -2943,7 +2945,7 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *soc skb->priority = sk->sk_priority; skb->mark = sockc.mark; -if (po->has_vnet_hdr) { +if (has_vnet_hdr) { err =virtio_net_hdr_to_skb (skb, &vnet_hdr,vio_le ());if (err) goto out_free;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.13/packet-in-packet_do_bind-test-fanout-with-bind_lock-held.patch queue-4.13/packet-only-test-po-has_vnet_hdr-once-in-packet_snd.patch queue-4.13/packet-hold-bind-lock-when-rebinding-to-fanout-hook.patch