Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Patch "kvm: vmx: Flush TLB when the APIC-access address changes" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Dec 21, 2017

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer Applied
#0 lore raw

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

kvm: vmx: Flush TLB when the APIC-access address changes

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
kvm-vmx-flush-tlb-when-the-apic-access-address-changes.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

Quoted 1 line

From foo@baz Thu Dec 21 09:02:40 CET 2017

From: Jim Mattson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:53:59 -0700
Subject: kvm: vmx: Flush TLB when the APIC-access address changes

From: Jim Mattson <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit fb6c8198431311027c3434d4e94ab8bc040f7aea ]

Quoting from the Intel SDM, volume 3, section 28.3.3.4: Guidelines for Use of the INVEPT Instruction:

If EPT was in use on a logical processor at one time with EPTP X, it is recommended that software use the INVEPT instruction with the "single-context" INVEPT type and with EPTP X in the INVEPT descriptor before a VM entry on the same logical processor that enables EPT with EPTP X and either (a) the "virtualize APIC accesses" VM-execution control was changed from 0 to 1; or (b) the value of the APIC-access address was changed.

In the nested case, the burden falls on L1, unless L0 enables EPT in vmcs02 when L1 doesn't enable EPT in vmcs12.

---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c |   18 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c +17 -1
@@ -3818,6 +3818,12 @@ static void vmx_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcp
 	__vmx_flush_tlb(vcpu, to_vmx(vcpu)->vpid);
 }
 
+static void vmx_flush_tlb_ept_only(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	if (enable_ept)
+		vmx_flush_tlb(vcpu);
+}
+
 static void vmx_decache_cr0_guest_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	ulong cr0_guest_owned_bits = vcpu->arch.cr0_guest_owned_bits;
@@ -8505,6 +8511,7 @@ static void vmx_set_virtual_x2apic_mode(
 	} else {
 		sec_exec_control &= ~SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_X2APIC_MODE;
 		sec_exec_control |= SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES;
+		vmx_flush_tlb_ept_only(vcpu);
 	}
 	vmcs_write32(SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, sec_exec_control);
 
@@ -8530,8 +8537,10 @@ static void vmx_set_apic_access_page_add
 	 */
 	if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu) ||
 	    !nested_cpu_has2(get_vmcs12(&vmx->vcpu),
-			     SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES))
+			     SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES)) {
 		vmcs_write64(APIC_ACCESS_ADDR, hpa);
+		vmx_flush_tlb_ept_only(vcpu);
+	}
 }
 
 static void vmx_hwapic_isr_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int max_isr)
@@ -10110,6 +10119,9 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vc
 	if (nested_cpu_has_ept(vmcs12)) {
 		kvm_mmu_unload(vcpu);
 		nested_ept_init_mmu_context(vcpu);
+	} else if (nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12,
+				   SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES)) {
+		vmx_flush_tlb_ept_only(vcpu);
 	}
 
 	if (vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_EFER)
@@ -10850,6 +10862,10 @@ static void nested_vmx_vmexit(struct kvm
 		vmx->nested.change_vmcs01_virtual_x2apic_mode = false;
 		vmx_set_virtual_x2apic_mode(vcpu,
 				vcpu->arch.apic_base & X2APIC_ENABLE);
+	} else if (!nested_cpu_has_ept(vmcs12) &&
+		   nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12,
+				   SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES)) {
+		vmx_flush_tlb_ept_only(vcpu);
 	}
 
 	/* This is needed for same reason as it was needed in prepare_vmcs02 */

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-4.9/x86-kvm-vmx-simplify-segment_base.patch queue-4.9/kvm-vmx-flush-tlb-when-the-apic-access-address-changes.patch queue-4.9/kvm-vmx-fix-enable-vpid-conditions.patch