Patch "timers: Use deferrable base independent of base::nohz_active" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
timers: Use deferrable base independent of base::nohz_active
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
timers-use-deferrable-base-independent-of-base-nohz_active.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
ced6d5c11d3e7b342f1a80f908e6756ebd4b8dddMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anna-Maria Gleixner <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 15:51:12 +0100
Subject: timers: Use deferrable base independent of base::nohz_active
From: Anna-Maria Gleixner <[email protected]>
commit ced6d5c11d3e7b342f1a80f908e6756ebd4b8ddd upstream.
During boot and before base::nohz_active is set in the timer bases, deferrable timers are enqueued into the standard timer base. This works correctly as long as base::nohz_active is false.
Once it base::nohz_active is set and a timer which was enqueued before that is accessed the lock selector code choses the lock of the deferred base. This causes unlocked access to the standard base and in case the timer is removed it does not clear the pending flag in the standard base bitmap which causes get_next_timer_interrupt() to return bogus values.
To prevent that, the deferrable timers must be enqueued in the deferrable base, even when base::nohz_active is not set. Those deferrable timers also need to be expired unconditional.
--- kernel/time/timer.c | 16 +++++++--------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
kernel/time/timer.c +7 -9
@@ -814,11 +814,10 @@ static inline struct timer_base *get_timstruct timer_base *base =per_cpu_ptr (&timer_bases[BASE_STD ], cpu);/* -* If the timer is deferrable and nohz is active then we need to use -* the deferrable base. +* If the timer is deferrable and NO_HZ_COMMON is set then we need +* to use the deferrable base. */ -if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON ) && base->nohz_active && - (tflags &TIMER_DEFERRABLE )) +if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON ) && (tflags &TIMER_DEFERRABLE )) base =per_cpu_ptr (&timer_bases[BASE_DEF ], cpu);return base; }
@@ -828,11 +827,10 @@ static inline struct timer_base *get_timstruct timer_base *base =this_cpu_ptr (&timer_bases[BASE_STD ]);/* -* If the timer is deferrable and nohz is active then we need to use -* the deferrable base. +* If the timer is deferrable and NO_HZ_COMMON is set then we need +* to use the deferrable base. */ -if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON ) && base->nohz_active && - (tflags &TIMER_DEFERRABLE )) +if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON ) && (tflags &TIMER_DEFERRABLE )) base =this_cpu_ptr (&timer_bases[BASE_DEF ]);return base; }
@@ -1644,7 +1642,7 @@ static __latent_entropy void run_timer_s base->must_forward_clk = false;__run_timers (base); -if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON ) && base->nohz_active) +if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON ))__run_timers (this_cpu_ptr (&timer_bases[BASE_DEF ])); }
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.14/nohz-prevent-a-timer-interrupt-storm-in-tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick.patch queue-4.14/timers-invoke-timer_start_debug-where-it-makes-sense.patch queue-4.14/timers-use-deferrable-base-independent-of-base-nohz_active.patch queue-4.14/timers-reinitialize-per-cpu-bases-on-hotplug.patch