netfilter: xt_hashlimit: do not allow empty names
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 netfilter: xt_hashlimit: do not allow empty names
From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Syzbot reported a WARN() in proc_create_data() [1]
Issue here is that xt_hashlimit does not check that user space provided an empty table name.
[1]
name len 0
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3680 at fs/proc/generic.c:354 __proc_create+0x696/0x880 fs/proc/generic.c:354 Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ... CPU: 0 PID: 3680 Comm: syzkaller464755 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc9+ #283 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline] dump_stack+0x194/0x257 lib/dump_stack.c:53 panic+0x1e4/0x41c kernel/panic.c:183 __warn+0x1dc/0x200 kernel/panic.c:547 report_bug+0x211/0x2d0 lib/bug.c:184 fixup_bug.part.11+0x37/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:178 fixup_bug arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:247 [inline] do_error_trap+0x2d7/0x3e0 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:296 do_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:315 invalid_op+0x22/0x40 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:1096 RIP: 0010:__proc_create+0x696/0x880 fs/proc/generic.c:354 RSP: 0018:ffff8801d9607410 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: dffffc0000000008 RBX: 1ffff1003b2c0e87 RCX: ffffffff8159ebae RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 1ffff1003b284970 RDI: 0000000000000293 RBP: ffff8801d9607580 R08: 1ffff1003b2c0e15 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffff8801d96072c8 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8801d981ef28 R13: ffff8801d9607558 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8801d9607518 proc_create_data+0x76/0x180 fs/proc/generic.c:488 htable_create net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c:333 [inline] hashlimit_mt_check_common.isra.9+0xaee/0x1420 net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c:900 hashlimit_mt_check_v1+0x48d/0x640 net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c:926 xt_check_match+0x231/0x7d0 net/netfilter/x_tables.c:465 check_match net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:479 [inline] find_check_match net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:495 [inline] find_check_entry.isra.8+0x3fc/0xcb0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:544 translate_table+0xed1/0x1610 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:730 do_replace net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1148 [inline] do_ipt_set_ctl+0x370/0x5f0 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c:1682 nf_sockopt net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:106 [inline] nf_setsockopt+0x67/0xc0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:115 ip_setsockopt+0xa1/0xb0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1256 tcp_setsockopt+0x82/0xd0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2875 sock_common_setsockopt+0x95/0xd0 net/core/sock.c:2968 SYSC_setsockopt net/socket.c:1831 [inline] SyS_setsockopt+0x189/0x360 net/socket.c:1810 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x29/0xa0
---
net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c +2 -0
@@ -894,6 +894,8 @@ static int hashlimit_mt_check_common(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par,return -ERANGE ; } +if (!name[0 ]) +return -EINVAL ;mutex_lock (&hashlimit_mutex); *hinfo =htable_find_get (net, name, par->family);if (*hinfo ==NULL ) {
Quoted 18 lines · Eric Dumazet
From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Syzbot reported a
WARN()inproc_create_data()[1]Issue here is that
xt_hashlimitdoes not check that user space provided an empty table name.Signed-off-by Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>Reported-by syzbot <[email protected]>---
net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c | 2 ++1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c +0
-0
net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c static int hashlimit_mt_check_common(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par, · line 901
Quoted 8 lines
net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c +2
-0@@ -894,6 +894,8 @@ static int hashlimit_mt_check_common(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par,return -ERANGE ; } +if (!name[0 ]) +return -EINVAL ;mutex_lock (&hashlimit_mutex); *hinfo =htable_find_get (net, name, par->family);if (*hinfo ==NULL ) {
I wonder if we should also check if name includes a '/' ?
if (!name[0] || strchr(name, '/'))
return -EINVAL;
Florian Westphal
maintainerQuoted 30 lines · Eric Dumazet
Quoted 18 lines · Eric Dumazet
From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Syzbot reported a
WARN()inproc_create_data()[1]Issue here is that
xt_hashlimitdoes not check that user space provided an empty table name.Signed-off-by Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>Reported-by syzbot <[email protected]>---
net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c | 2 ++1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c +0
-0net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c static int hashlimit_mt_check_common(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par, · line 901
Quoted 8 lines
net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c +2
-0@@ -894,6 +894,8 @@ static int hashlimit_mt_check_common(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par,return -ERANGE ; } +if (!name[0 ]) +return -EINVAL ;mutex_lock (&hashlimit_mutex); *hinfo =htable_find_get (net, name, par->family);if (*hinfo ==NULL ) {I wonder if we should also check if name includes a '/' ?
Quoted 2 lines
if (!name[0] ||
strchr(name, '/'))return -EINVAL;
I think there should be a helper for this to reject
- 0 length
- /
- .
- ..
in hashlimit case name is IFNMASIZ so we could even use dev_valid_name() here.
Pablo Neira Ayuso
maintainerQuoted 30 lines · Eric Dumazet
Quoted 18 lines · Eric Dumazet
From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Syzbot reported a
WARN()inproc_create_data()[1]Issue here is that
xt_hashlimitdoes not check that user space provided an empty table name.Signed-off-by Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>Reported-by syzbot <[email protected]>---
net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c | 2 ++1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c +0
-0net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c static int hashlimit_mt_check_common(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par, · line 901
Quoted 8 lines
net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c +2
-0@@ -894,6 +894,8 @@ static int hashlimit_mt_check_common(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par,return -ERANGE ; } +if (!name[0 ]) +return -EINVAL ;mutex_lock (&hashlimit_mutex); *hinfo =htable_find_get (net, name, par->family);if (*hinfo ==NULL ) {I wonder if we should also check if name includes a '/' ?
Quoted 2 lines
if (!name[0] ||
strchr(name, '/'))return -EINVAL;
We can probably add our own variant of dev_valid_name?
bool nf_valid_name(const char *name, size_t len)
{
if (*name == '\0')
return false;
if (strlen(name) >= len)
return false;
if (!strcmp(name, ".") || !strcmp(name, ".."))
return false;
while (*name) {
if (*name == '/' || *name == ':' || isspace(*name))
return false;
name++;
}
return true;
}Or place this in the core, something like:
bool net_valid_name(const char *name, size_t len)
{
...
}then use it from dev_valid_name()
bool dev_valid_name(const char *name)
{
return net_valid_name(name, IFNAMSIZ);
}@Eric, I can give it a shot here to this, just let me know. Thanks!
Pablo Neira Ayuso
maintainerOn Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 12:49:38PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
[...]
Quoted 8 lines
Or place this in the core, something like:
bool
net_valid_name(const char *name, size_t len){ ... }
Quoted 6 lines
then use it from
dev_valid_name()bool
dev_valid_name(const char *name){ return net_valid_name(name, IFNAMSIZ); }
Just to clarify, I think I prefer this approach, probably other subsystem can benefit from this generic approach too.
BTW, I wonder if we should use strnlen() instead of strlen() in dev_valid_name(), I guess this not useful for device name since they are guaranteed to be nul-terminated, but netfilter this would be good given userspace can send us a non nul-terminated string. But in general, I think it doesn't harm to use strnlen() in dev_valid_name().
Am I missing anything in all these tricky string handling? Thanks!
Pablo Neira Ayuso
maintainerQuoted 17 lines · Pablo Neira Ayuso
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 12:49:38PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
[...]Quoted 8 lines
Or place this in the core, something like:
bool
net_valid_name(const char *name, size_t len){ ... }Quoted 6 lines
then use it from
dev_valid_name()bool
dev_valid_name(const char *name){ return net_valid_name(name, IFNAMSIZ); }
Quoted 8 lines
Just to clarify, I think I prefer this approach, probably other subsystem can benefit from this generic approach too.
BTW, I wonder if we should use
strnlen()instead ofstrlen()indev_valid_name(), I guess this not useful for device name since they are guaranteed to be nul-terminated, but netfilter this would be good given userspace can send us a non nul-terminated string. But in general, I think it doesn't harm to usestrnlen()indev_valid_name().
Argh sorry, I'm talking about the hypothetical net_valid_name() function, not dev_valid_name() itself.
Quoted 8 lines · Pablo Neira Ayuso
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 12:49:38PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
[...]Quoted 4 lines
bool
net_valid_name(const char *name, size_t len){ ... }Am I missing anything in all these tricky string handling? Thanks!
One will have to watch out for calls like
net_valid_name(NLA_DATA(some_ifla_name), IFNAMSIZ)
because quite some nlattrs (IFLA_NAME, IFLA_IFNAME to boot) are NLA_STRINGs (rather than NLA_NUL_STRINGs) and they are not \0-terminated.
Pablo Neira Ayuso
maintainerQuoted 9 lines · Jan Engelhardt
Quoted 7 lines · Pablo Neira Ayuso
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 12:49:38PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
[...]Quoted 4 lines
bool
net_valid_name(const char *name, size_t len){ ... }
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Am I missing anything in all these tricky string handling? Thanks!
One will have to watch out for calls like
net_valid_name(NLA_DATA(some_ifla_name), IFNAMSIZ)because quite some nlattrs (
IFLA_NAME,IFLA_IFNAMEto boot) areNLA_STRINGs(rather thanNLA_NUL_STRINGs) and they are not \0-terminated.
As long as we use nla_str*() helpers, we're all good.
Quoted 1 line · Pablo Neira Ayuso
@Eric, I can give it a shot here to this, just let me know. Thanks!
Please go ahead Pablo !
Thanks.