scsi: ufs: make UFS Tx lane1 clock optional for QCOM platforms
Subsystems (2)
PATCH v3 1/1 scsi: ufs: make UFS Tx lane1 clock optional for QCOM platforms
From: Venkat Gopalakrishnan <[email protected]>
Per Qcom's UFS host controller HW design, the UFS Tx lane1 clock could be muxed with Tx lane0 clock, hence keep Tx lane1 clock optional by ignoring it if it is not provided in device tree. This change also performs some cleanup to lanes per direction checks when enable/disable lane clocks just for symmetry.
---
Changes since v2:
- Incorporated review comments from Doug.
Changes since v1:
- Incorporated review comments from Doug.
- Update the commit title and commit message.
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c +29 -26
@@ -79,20 +79,28 @@ static int ufs_qcom_get_connected_tx_lanes(struct ufs_hba *hba, u32 *tx_lanes) }static int ufs_qcom_host_clk_get (struct device *dev, -const char *name,struct clk **clk_out) +const char *name,struct clk **clk_out,bool optional) {struct clk *clk;int err =0 ; clk =devm_clk_get (dev, name); -if (IS_ERR (clk)) { - err =PTR_ERR (clk); -dev_err (dev,"%s: failed to get %s err %d" , - __func__, name, err); - }else { +if (!IS_ERR (clk)) { *clk_out = clk; +return 0 ; } + err =PTR_ERR (clk); + +if (optional && err == -ENOENT ) { + *clk_out =NULL ; +return 0 ; + } + +if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER ) +dev_err (dev,"failed to get %s err %d" , + name, err); +return err; }
@@ -113,11 +121,9 @@ static void ufs_qcom_disable_lane_clks(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)if (!host->is_lane_clks_enabled)return ; -if (host->hba->lanes_per_direction >1 ) -clk_disable_unprepare (host->tx_l1_sync_clk); +clk_disable_unprepare (host->tx_l1_sync_clk);clk_disable_unprepare (host->tx_l0_sync_clk); -if (host->hba->lanes_per_direction >1 ) -clk_disable_unprepare (host->rx_l1_sync_clk); +clk_disable_unprepare (host->rx_l1_sync_clk);clk_disable_unprepare (host->rx_l0_sync_clk); host->is_lane_clks_enabled = false;
@@ -141,24 +147,21 @@ static int ufs_qcom_enable_lane_clks(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)if (err) goto disable_rx_l0; -if (host->hba->lanes_per_direction >1 ) { - err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_enable (dev,"rx_lane1_sync_clk" , + err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_enable (dev,"rx_lane1_sync_clk" , host->rx_l1_sync_clk); -if (err) - goto disable_tx_l0; +if (err) + goto disable_tx_l0; - err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_enable (dev,"tx_lane1_sync_clk" , + err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_enable (dev,"tx_lane1_sync_clk" , host->tx_l1_sync_clk); -if (err) - goto disable_rx_l1; - } +if (err) + goto disable_rx_l1; host->is_lane_clks_enabled = true; goto out; disable_rx_l1: -if (host->hba->lanes_per_direction >1 ) -clk_disable_unprepare (host->rx_l1_sync_clk); +clk_disable_unprepare (host->rx_l1_sync_clk); disable_tx_l0:clk_disable_unprepare (host->tx_l0_sync_clk); disable_rx_l0:
@@ -172,25 +175,25 @@ static int ufs_qcom_init_lane_clks(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)int err =0 ;struct device *dev = host->hba->dev; - err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_get (dev, -"rx_lane0_sync_clk" , &host->rx_l0_sync_clk); + err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_get (dev,"rx_lane0_sync_clk" , + &host->rx_l0_sync_clk, false);if (err) goto out; - err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_get (dev, -"tx_lane0_sync_clk" , &host->tx_l0_sync_clk); + err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_get (dev,"tx_lane0_sync_clk" , + &host->tx_l0_sync_clk, false);if (err) goto out;/* In case of single lane per direction, don't read lane1 clocks */ if (host->hba->lanes_per_direction >1 ) { err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_get (dev,"rx_lane1_sync_clk" , - &host->rx_l1_sync_clk); + &host->rx_l1_sync_clk, false);if (err) goto out; err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_get (dev,"tx_lane1_sync_clk" , - &host->tx_l1_sync_clk); + &host->tx_l1_sync_clk, true); } out:return err;
Signature · 2 lines
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Quoted 129 lines · Can Guo
From: Venkat Gopalakrishnan <[email protected]>
Per Qcom's UFS host controller HW design, the UFS Tx lane1 clock could be muxed with Tx lane0 clock, hence keep Tx lane1 clock optional by ignoring it if it is not provided in device tree. This change also performs some cleanup to lanes per direction checks when enable/disable lane clocks just for symmetry.
Signed-off-by Venkat Gopalakrishnan <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Subhash Jadavani <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Can Guo <[email protected]>---
Changes since v2:
- Incorporated review comments from Doug.Changes since v1:
- Incorporated review comments from Doug.
- Update the commit title and commit message.drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c +27
-25@@ -79,20 +79,28 @@ static int ufs_qcom_get_connected_tx_lanes(struct ufs_hba *hba, u32 *tx_lanes) }static int ufs_qcom_host_clk_get (struct device *dev, -const char *name,struct clk **clk_out) +const char *name,struct clk **clk_out,bool optional) {struct clk *clk;int err =0 ; clk =devm_clk_get (dev, name); -if (IS_ERR (clk)) { - err =PTR_ERR (clk); -dev_err (dev,"%s: failed to get %s err %d" , - __func__, name, err); - }else { +if (!IS_ERR (clk)) { *clk_out = clk; +return 0 ; } + err =PTR_ERR (clk); + +if (optional && err == -ENOENT ) { + *clk_out =NULL ; +return 0 ; + } + +if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER ) +dev_err (dev,"failed to get %s err %d" , + name, err); +return err; }@@ -113,11 +121,9 @@ static void ufs_qcom_disable_lane_clks(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)if (!host->is_lane_clks_enabled)return ; -if (host->hba->lanes_per_direction >1 ) -clk_disable_unprepare (host->tx_l1_sync_clk); +clk_disable_unprepare (host->tx_l1_sync_clk);clk_disable_unprepare (host->tx_l0_sync_clk); -if (host->hba->lanes_per_direction >1 ) -clk_disable_unprepare (host->rx_l1_sync_clk); +clk_disable_unprepare (host->rx_l1_sync_clk);clk_disable_unprepare (host->rx_l0_sync_clk); host->is_lane_clks_enabled = false;@@ -141,24 +147,21 @@ static int ufs_qcom_enable_lane_clks(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)if (err) goto disable_rx_l0; -if (host->hba->lanes_per_direction >1 ) { - err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_enable (dev,"rx_lane1_sync_clk" , + err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_enable (dev,"rx_lane1_sync_clk" , host->rx_l1_sync_clk); -if (err) - goto disable_tx_l0; +if (err) + goto disable_tx_l0; - err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_enable (dev,"tx_lane1_sync_clk" , + err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_enable (dev,"tx_lane1_sync_clk" , host->tx_l1_sync_clk); -if (err) - goto disable_rx_l1; - } +if (err) + goto disable_rx_l1; host->is_lane_clks_enabled = true; goto out; disable_rx_l1: -if (host->hba->lanes_per_direction >1 ) -clk_disable_unprepare (host->rx_l1_sync_clk); +clk_disable_unprepare (host->rx_l1_sync_clk); disable_tx_l0:clk_disable_unprepare (host->tx_l0_sync_clk); disable_rx_l0:@@ -172,25 +175,25 @@ static int ufs_qcom_init_lane_clks(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)int err =0 ;struct device *dev = host->hba->dev; - err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_get (dev, -"rx_lane0_sync_clk" , &host->rx_l0_sync_clk); + err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_get (dev,"rx_lane0_sync_clk" , + &host->rx_l0_sync_clk, false);if (err) goto out; - err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_get (dev, -"tx_lane0_sync_clk" , &host->tx_l0_sync_clk); + err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_get (dev,"tx_lane0_sync_clk" , + &host->tx_l0_sync_clk, false);if (err) goto out;/* In case of single lane per direction, don't read lane1 clocks */ if (host->hba->lanes_per_direction >1 ) { err = ufs_qcom_host_clk_get(dev, "rx_lane1_sync_clk", - &host->rx_l1_sync_clk);
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c static int ufs_qcom_init_lane_clks(struct ufs_qcom_host *host) · line 199
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c +2
-1+ &host->rx_l1_sync_clk, false);if (err) goto out; err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_get (dev,"tx_lane1_sync_clk" , - &host->tx_l1_sync_clk); + &host->tx_l1_sync_clk, true); } out:return err;
Best regards
Vivek
Hi,
Quoted 135 lines · Vivek Gautam
Quoted 121 lines · Can Guo
From: Venkat Gopalakrishnan <[email protected]>
Per Qcom's UFS host controller HW design, the UFS Tx lane1 clock could be muxed with Tx lane0 clock, hence keep Tx lane1 clock optional by ignoring it if it is not provided in device tree. This change also performs some cleanup to lanes per direction checks when enable/disable lane clocks just for symmetry.
Signed-off-by Venkat Gopalakrishnan <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Subhash Jadavani <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Can Guo <[email protected]>---
Changes since v2:
- Incorporated review comments from Doug.Changes since v1:
- Incorporated review comments from Doug.
- Update the commit title and commit message.drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c +26
-19@@ -79,20 +79,28 @@ static int ufs_qcom_get_connected_tx_lanes(struct ufs_hba *hba, u32 *tx_lanes) }static int ufs_qcom_host_clk_get (struct device *dev, -const char *name,struct clk **clk_out) +const char *name,struct clk **clk_out,bool optional) {struct clk *clk;int err =0 ; clk =devm_clk_get (dev, name); -if (IS_ERR (clk)) { - err =PTR_ERR (clk); -dev_err (dev,"%s: failed to get %s err %d" , - __func__, name, err); - }else { +if (!IS_ERR (clk)) { *clk_out = clk; +return 0 ; } + err =PTR_ERR (clk); + +if (optional && err == -ENOENT ) { + *clk_out =NULL ; +return 0 ; + } + +if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER ) +dev_err (dev,"failed to get %s err %d" , + name, err); +return err; } @@ -113,11 +121,9 @@ static void ufs_qcom_disable_lane_clks(struct ufs_qcom_host *host) if (!host->is_lane_clks_enabled) return; - if (host->hba->lanes_per_direction > 1) -clk_disable_unprepare (host->tx_l1_sync_clk); +clk_disable_unprepare (host->tx_l1_sync_clk);clk_disable_unprepare (host->tx_l0_sync_clk); -if (host->hba->lanes_per_direction >1 ) -clk_disable_unprepare (host->rx_l1_sync_clk); +clk_disable_unprepare (host->rx_l1_sync_clk);clk_disable_unprepare (host->rx_l0_sync_clk); host->is_lane_clks_enabled = false;@@ -141,24 +147,21 @@ static int ufs_qcom_enable_lane_clks(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)if (err) goto disable_rx_l0; - if (host->hba->lanes_per_direction > 1) { - err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_enable (dev,"rx_lane1_sync_clk" , + err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_enable (dev,"rx_lane1_sync_clk" , host->rx_l1_sync_clk); -if (err) - goto disable_tx_l0; +if (err) + goto disable_tx_l0; - err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_enable (dev,"tx_lane1_sync_clk" , + err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_enable (dev,"tx_lane1_sync_clk" , host->tx_l1_sync_clk); -if (err) - goto disable_rx_l1; - } +if (err) + goto disable_rx_l1; host->is_lane_clks_enabled = true; goto out; disable_rx_l1: -if (host->hba->lanes_per_direction >1 ) -clk_disable_unprepare (host->rx_l1_sync_clk); +clk_disable_unprepare (host->rx_l1_sync_clk); disable_tx_l0:clk_disable_unprepare (host->tx_l0_sync_clk); disable_rx_l0:@@ -172,25 +175,25 @@ static int ufs_qcom_init_lane_clks(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)int err =0 ;struct device *dev = host->hba->dev; - err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_get (dev, -"rx_lane0_sync_clk" , &host->rx_l0_sync_clk); + err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_get (dev,"rx_lane0_sync_clk" , + &host->rx_l0_sync_clk, false);if (err) goto out; - err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_get (dev, -"tx_lane0_sync_clk" , &host->tx_l0_sync_clk); + err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_get (dev,"tx_lane0_sync_clk" , + &host->tx_l0_sync_clk, false);if (err) goto out;/* In case of single lane per direction, don't read lane1 clocks */ if (host->hba->lanes_per_direction >1 ) { err = ufs_qcom_host_clk_get(dev, "rx_lane1_sync_clk",drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c static int ufs_qcom_init_lane_clks(struct · line 199
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c +2
-2- &host->rx_l1_sync_clk); + &host->rx_l1_sync_clk, false);if (err) goto out; err =ufs_qcom_host_clk_get (dev,"tx_lane1_sync_clk" , - &host->tx_l1_sync_clk); + &host->tx_l1_sync_clk, true); } out:return err;Reviewed-by Vivek Gautam <[email protected]>
Quoted 2 lines
Best regards
Vivek
Thank you Vivek.
-Can Guo
Hi,
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c static int ufs_qcom_get_connected_tx_lanes(struct ufs_hba *hba, u32 *tx_lanes) · line 102
Quoted 3 lines · Can Guo
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c +3
-0+if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER ) +dev_err (dev,"failed to get %s err %d" , + name, err);
I wouldn't spin just for this, but if you spin for some other reason you could move the above "dev_err" onto one line now. Sorry: I should have noticed that / done that on my patch...
Review static int ufs_qcom_enable_lane_clks(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
Quoted 1 line
(quoted diff) +0
-0@@ -141,24 +147,21 @@ static int ufs_qcom_enable_lane_clks(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
Idea for a future patch: now that I look at what's left of this function you're basically re-implementing clk_bulk_prepare_enable() and clk_bulk_disable_unprepare() now. I bet your code would be cleaner / nicer by switching to that.
...possibly you might need to improve the clk_bulk_get() API to allow for some clock to be optional, but that would be a pretty easy patch to post up.
In any case I think it's better to do the clk_bulk switch in a future / separate patch, so:
-Doug
Quoted 12 lines · Doug Anderson
Hi,
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c static int ufs_qcom_get_connected_tx_lanes(struct ufs_hba *hba, u32 *tx_lanes) · line 102
Quoted 3 lines · Can Guo
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c +3
-0+if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER ) +dev_err (dev,"failed to get %s err %d" , + name, err);I wouldn't spin just for this, but if you spin for some other reason you could move the above "
dev_err" onto one line now. Sorry: I should have noticed that / done that on my patch...
Yeah... I didn't notice it too. Shall push a new one to address it.
Quoted 12 lines
Review static int ufs_qcom_enable_lane_clks(struct · line 147
Quoted 2 lines
(quoted diff) +0
-0@@ -141,24 +147,21 @@ static int ufs_qcom_enable_lane_clks(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)Idea for a future patch: now that I look at what's left of this function you're basically re-implementing
clk_bulk_prepare_enable()andclk_bulk_disable_unprepare()now. I bet your code would be cleaner / nicer by switching to that....possibly you might need to improve the
clk_bulk_get()API to allow for some clock to be optional, but that would be a pretty easy patch to post up.
Quoted 8 lines
In any case I think it's better to do the
clk_bulkswitch in a future / separate patch, so:Reviewed-by Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>Tested-by Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>-Doug
That is a good idea, I shall follow up after this one is merged.
Thank you.
-Can Guo