Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ovl: fix recursive oi->lock in ovl_link()" failed to apply to 4.18-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 2 participants 3 messages Nov 15, 2018

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 4.18-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

Quoted 1 line

From 6cd078702f2f33cb6b19a682de3e9184112f1a46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: Amir Goldstein <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 09:45:49 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] ovl: fix recursive oi->lock in ovl_link()

linking a non-copied-up file into a non-copied-up parent results in a nested call to mutex_lock_interruptible(&oi->lock). Fix this by copying up target parent before ovl_nlink_start(), same as done in ovl_rename().

~/unionmount-testsuite$ ./run --ov -s ~/unionmount-testsuite$ ln /mnt/a/foo100 /mnt/a/dir100/

WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
--------------------------------------------
ln/1545 is trying to acquire lock:
00000000bcce7c4c (&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]){+.+.}, at:

     ovl_copy_up_start+0x28/0x7d
 but task is already holding lock:
 0000000026d73d5b (&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]){+.+.}, at:
     ovl_nlink_start+0x3c/0xc1

[SzM: this seems to be a false positive, but doing the copy-up first is harmless and removes the lockdep splat]

Reported-by [email protected]
Fixes 5f8415d6b87e ("ovl: persistent overlay inode nlink for...")
Cc <[email protected]> # v4.13
fs/overlayfs/dir.c +4 -0
index 276914ae3c60..e1a55ecb7aba 100644
@@ -663,6 +663,10 @@ static int ovl_link(struct dentry *old, struct inode *newdir,
 	if (err)
 		goto out_drop_write;
 
+	err = ovl_copy_up(new->d_parent);
+	if (err)
+		goto out_drop_write;
+
 	if (ovl_is_metacopy_dentry(old)) {
 		err = ovl_set_redirect(old, false);
 		if (err)
maintainer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:06 AM <[email protected]> wrote:

The patch below does not apply to the 4.18-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

Attached. Should apply to v4.14 as well.

Thanks,
Amir.

From 23a290ac1335544c2e74562f21feb5f838e192db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amir Goldstein <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 09:45:49 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] ovl: fix recursive oi->lock in ovl_link()

commit 6cd078702f2f33cb6b19a682de3e9184112f1a46 upstream.

linking a non-copied-up file into a non-copied-up parent results in a nested call to mutex_lock_interruptible(&oi->lock). Fix this by copying up target parent before ovl_nlink_start(), same as done in ovl_rename().

~/unionmount-testsuite$ ./run --ov -s ~/unionmount-testsuite$ ln /mnt/a/foo100 /mnt/a/dir100/

WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
--------------------------------------------
ln/1545 is trying to acquire lock:
00000000bcce7c4c (&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]){+.+.}, at:

     ovl_copy_up_start+0x28/0x7d
 but task is already holding lock:
 0000000026d73d5b (&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]){+.+.}, at:
     ovl_nlink_start+0x3c/0xc1

[SzM: this seems to be a false positive, but doing the copy-up first is harmless and removes the lockdep splat]

Reported-by [email protected]
Fixes 5f8415d6b87e ("ovl: persistent overlay inode nlink for...")
Cc <[email protected]> # v4.13
[amir: backport to v4.18]
---
 fs/overlayfs/dir.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
fs/overlayfs/dir.c +5 -0
index d00e66b2a047..36847411c118 100644
@@ -661,6 +661,11 @@ static int ovl_link(struct dentry *old, struct inode *newdir,
 	if (err)
 		goto out_drop_write;
 
+	err = ovl_copy_up(new->d_parent);
+	if (err)
+		goto out_drop_write;
+
+
 	err = ovl_nlink_start(old, &locked);
 	if (err)
 		goto out_drop_write;
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
author maintainer
#2 lore raw
Quoted 10 lines · Amir Goldstein
Quoted 7 lines · On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:06 AM <[email protected]> wrote:

The patch below does not apply to the 4.18-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

Attached. Should apply to v4.14 as well.

Now applied, thanks!

greg k-h