userfaultd: Possible deadlock
Hi Christoph,
I think that a recent commit from you introduced the syzbot complaint shown below. Can you have a look at this?
I'm referring to commit ae62c16e105a ("userfaultfd: disable irqs when taking the waitqueue lock". That commit went upstream in kernel v4.20.
Thanks,
Bart.
syzbot has found the following crash on:
HEAD commit: 5eeb63359b1e Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master console output: https://syzkaller-buganizer.googleplex.com/text?tag=CrashLog&id=abfb8cf5ee75596c3cec97fbca90007f7c572fd5 kernel config: https://syzkaller-buganizer.googleplex.com/text?tag=Config&id=2f236acd4d07d3e9680112eeef52906988664d3b dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=554a124791d98722a022 compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet.
See http://go/syzbot for details on how to handle this bug.
=====================================================WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe ->SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.0.0-rc4+- #56 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz-executor5/9727 [HC0[0]SC0[0]HE0:SE1]is trying to acquire:00000000a4278d31 (&ctx->fault_pending_wqh){++-.} at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]00000000a4278d31 (&ctx->fault_pending_wqh){++-.} at: userfaultfd_ctx_read fs/userfaultfd.c:1040 [inline]00000000a4278d31 (&ctx->fault_pending_wqh){++-.} at: userfaultfd_read+-0x540/0x1940 fs/userfaultfd.c:1198
and this task is already holding:000000000e5b4350 (&ctx->fd_wqh){...} at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]000000000e5b4350 (&ctx->fd_wqh){...} at: userfaultfd_ctx_read fs/userfaultfd.c:1036 [inline]000000000e5b4350 (&ctx->fd_wqh){...} at: userfaultfd_read+-0x27a/0x1940 fs/userfaultfd.c:1198 which would create a new lock dependency:
(&ctx->fd_wqh){...}->(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh){++-.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){.-.}
... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-safe at:
lock_acquire+-0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:128 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+-0x60/0x80 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:160 spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline] free_ioctx_users+-0x2d/0x4a0 fs/aio.c:610 percpu_ref_put_many include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:285 [inline] percpu_ref_put include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:301 [inline] percpu_ref_call_confirm_rcu lib/percpu-refcount.c:123 [inline] percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+-0x3e7/0x520 lib/percpu-refcount.c:158 __rcu_reclaim kernel/rcu/rcu.h:240 [inline] rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2452 [inline] invoke_rcu_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:2773 [inline] rcu_process_callbacks+-0x928/0x1390 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2754 __do_softirq+-0x266/0x95a kernel/softirq.c:292 run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:654 [inline] run_ksoftirqd+-0x8e/0x110 kernel/softirq.c:646 smpboot_thread_fn+-0x6ab/0xa10 kernel/smpboot.c:164 kthread+-0x357/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:246 ret_from_fork+-0x3a/0x50 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352
to a SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh){++-.}
... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe at:
...
lock_acquire+-0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+-0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144 spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline] userfaultfd_release+-0x497/0x6d0 fs/userfaultfd.c:916 __fput+-0x2df/0x8d0 fs/file_table.c:278 ____fput+-0x16/0x20 fs/file_table.c:309 task_work_run+-0x14a/0x1c0 kernel/task_work.c:113 tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline] exit_to_usermode_loop+-0x273/0x2c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:166 prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:197 [inline] syscall_return_slowpath arch/x86/entry/common.c:268 [inline] do_syscall_64+-0x52d/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+-0x49/0xbe
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of: &&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock -->&ctx->fd_wqh -->&ctx->fault_pending_wqh
Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ---- lock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh); local_irq_disable(); lock(&&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock); lock(&ctx->fd_wqh); <Interrupt> lock(&&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock);
***DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by syz-executor5/9727:
#0: 000000000e5b4350 (&ctx->fd_wqh){...} at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline] #0: 000000000e5b4350 (&ctx->fd_wqh){...} at: userfaultfd_ctx_read fs/userfaultfd.c:1036 [inline] #0: 000000000e5b4350 (&ctx->fd_wqh){...} at: userfaultfd_read+-0x27a/0x1940 fs/userfaultfd.c:1198
the dependencies between SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock and the holding lock:
->(&&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){.-.}{ IN-SOFTIRQ-W at:
lock_acquire+-0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:128 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+-0x60/0x80 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:160
spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline] free_ioctx_users+-0x2d/0x4a0 fs/aio.c:610
percpu_ref_put_many include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:285 [inline] percpu_ref_put include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:301 [inline] percpu_ref_call_confirm_rcu lib/percpu-refcount.c:123 [inline] percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+-0x3e7/0x520 lib/percpu-refcount.c:158
__rcu_reclaim kernel/rcu/rcu.h:240 [inline] rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2452 [inline] invoke_rcu_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:2773 [inline] rcu_process_callbacks+-0x928/0x1390 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2754
__do_softirq+-0x266/0x95a kernel/softirq.c:292
run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:654 [inline] run_ksoftirqd+-0x8e/0x110 kernel/softirq.c:646
smpboot_thread_fn+-0x6ab/0xa10 kernel/smpboot.c:164
kthread+-0x357/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:246
ret_from_fork+-0x3a/0x50 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352
INITIAL USE at:
lock_acquire+-0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:128 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irq+-0x60/0x80 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:160
spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline] free_ioctx_users+-0x2d/0x4a0 fs/aio.c:610
percpu_ref_put_many include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:285 [inline] percpu_ref_put include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:301 [inline] percpu_ref_call_confirm_rcu lib/percpu-refcount.c:123 [inline] percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+-0x3e7/0x520 lib/percpu-refcount.c:158
__rcu_reclaim kernel/rcu/rcu.h:240 [inline] rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2452 [inline] invoke_rcu_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:2773 [inline] rcu_process_callbacks+-0x928/0x1390 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2754
__do_softirq+-0x266/0x95a kernel/softirq.c:292
run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:654 [inline] run_ksoftirqd+-0x8e/0x110 kernel/softirq.c:646
smpboot_thread_fn+-0x6ab/0xa10 kernel/smpboot.c:164
kthread+-0x357/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:246
ret_from_fork+-0x3a/0x50 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352
} ... key at: [<ffffffff8a5760a0>]__key.51972+-0x0/0x40
... acquired at:
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+-0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline] aio_poll fs/aio.c:1772 [inline] __io_submit_one fs/aio.c:1875 [inline] io_submit_one+-0xedf/0x1cf0 fs/aio.c:1908
__do_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:1953 [inline] __se_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:1923 [inline] __x64_sys_io_submit+-0x1bd/0x580 fs/aio.c:1923
do_syscall_64+-0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+-0x49/0xbe->(&ctx->fd_wqh){...}{ INITIAL USE at:
lock_acquire+-0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+-0x95/0xcd kernel/locking/spinlock.c:152
__wake_up_common_lock+-0xc7/0x190 kernel/sched/wait.c:120
__wake_up+-0xe/0x10 kernel/sched/wait.c:145
userfaultfd_release+-0x4f5/0x6d0 fs/userfaultfd.c:924
__fput+-0x2df/0x8d0 fs/file_table.c:278
____fput+-0x16/0x20 fs/file_table.c:309
task_work_run+-0x14a/0x1c0 kernel/task_work.c:113
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline] exit_to_usermode_loop+-0x273/0x2c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:166
prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:197 [inline] syscall_return_slowpath arch/x86/entry/common.c:268 [inline] do_syscall_64+-0x52d/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+-0x49/0xbe
} ... key at: [<ffffffff8a575e20>]__key.44854+-0x0/0x40
... acquired at:
lock_acquire+-0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+-0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline] userfaultfd_ctx_read fs/userfaultfd.c:1040 [inline] userfaultfd_read+-0x540/0x1940 fs/userfaultfd.c:1198
__vfs_read+-0x116/0x8c0 fs/read_write.c:416
vfs_read+-0x194/0x3e0 fs/read_write.c:452
ksys_read+-0xea/0x1f0 fs/read_write.c:578
__do_sys_read fs/read_write.c:588 [inline] __se_sys_read fs/read_write.c:586 [inline] __x64_sys_read+-0x73/0xb0 fs/read_write.c:586
do_syscall_64+-0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+-0x49/0xbethe dependencies between the lock to be acquired
and SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
->(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh){++-.}{ HARDIRQ-ON-W at:
lock_acquire+-0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+-0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline] userfaultfd_release+-0x497/0x6d0 fs/userfaultfd.c:916
__fput+-0x2df/0x8d0 fs/file_table.c:278
____fput+-0x16/0x20 fs/file_table.c:309
task_work_run+-0x14a/0x1c0 kernel/task_work.c:113
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline] exit_to_usermode_loop+-0x273/0x2c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:166
prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:197 [inline] syscall_return_slowpath arch/x86/entry/common.c:268 [inline] do_syscall_64+-0x52d/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+-0x49/0xbe
SOFTIRQ-ON-W at:
lock_acquire+-0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+-0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline] userfaultfd_release+-0x497/0x6d0 fs/userfaultfd.c:916
__fput+-0x2df/0x8d0 fs/file_table.c:278
____fput+-0x16/0x20 fs/file_table.c:309
task_work_run+-0x14a/0x1c0 kernel/task_work.c:113
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline] exit_to_usermode_loop+-0x273/0x2c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:166
prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:197 [inline] syscall_return_slowpath arch/x86/entry/common.c:268 [inline] do_syscall_64+-0x52d/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+-0x49/0xbe
INITIAL USE at:
lock_acquire+-0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+-0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline] userfaultfd_release+-0x497/0x6d0 fs/userfaultfd.c:916
__fput+-0x2df/0x8d0 fs/file_table.c:278
____fput+-0x16/0x20 fs/file_table.c:309
task_work_run+-0x14a/0x1c0 kernel/task_work.c:113
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline] exit_to_usermode_loop+-0x273/0x2c0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:166
prepare_exit_to_usermode arch/x86/entry/common.c:197 [inline] syscall_return_slowpath arch/x86/entry/common.c:268 [inline] do_syscall_64+-0x52d/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+-0x49/0xbe
} ... key at: [<ffffffff8a575ee0>]__key.44851+-0x0/0x40
... acquired at:
lock_acquire+-0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+-0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline] userfaultfd_ctx_read fs/userfaultfd.c:1040 [inline] userfaultfd_read+-0x540/0x1940 fs/userfaultfd.c:1198
__vfs_read+-0x116/0x8c0 fs/read_write.c:416
vfs_read+-0x194/0x3e0 fs/read_write.c:452
ksys_read+-0xea/0x1f0 fs/read_write.c:578
__do_sys_read fs/read_write.c:588 [inline] __se_sys_read fs/read_write.c:586 [inline] __x64_sys_read+-0x73/0xb0 fs/read_write.c:586
do_syscall_64+-0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+-0x49/0xbe
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 9727 Comm: syz-executor5 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc4+- #56
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+-0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113
print_bad_irq_dependency kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1573 [inline] check_usage.cold+-0x60f/0x940 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1605
check_irq_usage kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1661 [inline] check_prev_add_irq kernel/locking/lockdep_states.h:8 [inline] check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1871 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1979 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2350 [inline] __lock_acquire+-0x1f47/0x4700 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3338
lock_acquire+-0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3841
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+-0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline] userfaultfd_ctx_read fs/userfaultfd.c:1040 [inline] userfaultfd_read+-0x540/0x1940 fs/userfaultfd.c:1198
__vfs_read+-0x116/0x8c0 fs/read_write.c:416
vfs_read+-0x194/0x3e0 fs/read_write.c:452
ksys_read+-0xea/0x1f0 fs/read_write.c:578
__do_sys_read fs/read_write.c:588 [inline] __se_sys_read fs/read_write.c:586 [inline] __x64_sys_read+-0x73/0xb0 fs/read_write.c:586
do_syscall_64+-0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+-0x49/0xbe