Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] NFSv4.1: Again fix a race where CB_NOTIFY_LOCK fails to wake" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Jun 9, 2019

Subsystems (2)
Stable branch NFS client
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 52b042ab9948cc367b61f9ca9c18603aa7813c3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yihao Wu <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 01:57:10 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] NFSv4.1: Again fix a race where CB_NOTIFY_LOCK fails to wake
a waiter

Commit b7dbcc0e433f "NFSv4.1: Fix a race where CB_NOTIFY_LOCK fails to wake a waiter" found this bug. However it didn't fix it.

This commit replaces schedule_timeout() with wait_woken() and default_wake_function() with woken_wake_function() in function nfs4_retry_setlk() and nfs4_wake_lock_waiter(). wait_woken() uses memory barriers in its implementation to avoid potential race condition when putting a process into sleeping state and then waking it up.

Fixes a1d617d8f134 ("nfs: allow blocking locks to be awoken by lock callbacks")
Cc [email protected] #4.9+
Signed-off-by Yihao Wu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Anna Schumaker <[email protected]>
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +7 -17
index c29cbef6b53f..5f89bbd177c6 100644
@@ -6932,7 +6932,6 @@ struct nfs4_lock_waiter {
 	struct task_struct	*task;
 	struct inode		*inode;
 	struct nfs_lowner	*owner;
-	bool			notified;
 };
 
 static int

@@ -6954,13 +6953,13 @@ nfs4_wake_lock_waiter(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, unsigned int mode, int flags, vo
 		/* Make sure it's for the right inode */
 		if (nfs_compare_fh(NFS_FH(waiter->inode), &cbnl->cbnl_fh))
 			return 0;
-
-		waiter->notified = true;
 	}
 
 	/* override "private" so we can use default_wake_function */
 	wait->private = waiter->task;
-	ret = autoremove_wake_function(wait, mode, flags, key);
+	ret = woken_wake_function(wait, mode, flags, key);
+	if (ret)
+		list_del_init(&wait->entry);
 	wait->private = waiter;
 	return ret;
 }

@@ -6969,7 +6968,6 @@ static int
 nfs4_retry_setlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock *request)
 {
 	int status = -ERESTARTSYS;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	struct nfs4_lock_state *lsp = request->fl_u.nfs4_fl.owner;
 	struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(state->inode);
 	struct nfs_client *clp = server->nfs_client;

@@ -6979,8 +6977,7 @@ nfs4_retry_setlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock *request)
 				    .s_dev = server->s_dev };
 	struct nfs4_lock_waiter waiter = { .task  = current,
 					   .inode = state->inode,
-					   .owner = &owner,
-					   .notified = false };
+					   .owner = &owner};
 	wait_queue_entry_t wait;
 
 	/* Don't bother with waitqueue if we don't expect a callback */

@@ -6993,21 +6990,14 @@ nfs4_retry_setlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock *request)
 	add_wait_queue(q, &wait);
 
 	while(!signalled()) {
-		waiter.notified = false;
 		status = nfs4_proc_setlk(state, cmd, request);
 		if ((status != -EAGAIN) || IS_SETLK(cmd))
 			break;
 
 		status = -ERESTARTSYS;
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
-		if (waiter.notified) {
-			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
-			continue;
-		}
-		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
-
-		freezable_schedule_timeout(NFS4_LOCK_MAXTIMEOUT);
+		freezer_do_not_count();
+		wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, NFS4_LOCK_MAXTIMEOUT);
+		freezer_count();
 	}
 
 	finish_wait(q, &wait);