FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: Avoid Cavium TX2 erratum 219 when switching TTBR" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 9405447ef79bc93101373e130f72e9e6cbf17dbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:22:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Avoid Cavium TX2 erratum 219 when switching TTBR
As a PRFM instruction racing against a TTBR update can have undesirable effects on TX2, NOP-out such PRFM on cores that are affected by the TX2-219 erratum.
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h +2 -1
@@ -53,7 +53,8 @@#define ARM64_HAS_DCPODP 43#define ARM64_WORKAROUND_1463225 44#define ARM64_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_TX2_219_TVM 45 +#define ARM64_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_TX2_219_PRFM 46 -#define ARM64_NCAPS 46 +#define ARM64_NCAPS 47#endif /* __ASM_CPUCAPS_H */
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c +5 -0
@@ -884,6 +884,11 @@ const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[] = { ERRATA_MIDR_RANGE_LIST(tx2_family_cpus), .matches = needs_tx2_tvm_workaround, }, + { + .desc = "Cavium ThunderX2 erratum 219 (PRFM removal)", + .capability =ARM64_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_TX2_219_PRFM , + ERRATA_MIDR_RANGE_LIST(tx2_family_cpus), + }, #endif { }
arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S +2 -0
@@ -1070,7 +1070,9 @@ alternative_insn isb, nop, ARM64_WORKAROUND_QCOM_FALKOR_E1003 #else ldr x30, =vectors #endif +alternative_if_not ARM64_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_TX2_219_PRFM prfm plil1strm, [x30, #(1b - tramp_vectors)] +alternative_else_nop_endif msr vbar_el1, x30 add x30, x30, #(1b - tramp_vectors) isb
Sasha Levin
maintainerQuoted 17 lines · On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 02:53:33PM +0100, [email protected] wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From
9405447ef79bc93101373e130f72e9e6cbf17dbbMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:22:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Avoid Cavium TX2 erratum 219 when switching TTBR
Quoted 7 lines
As a PRFM instruction racing against a TTBR update can have undesirable effects on TX2, NOP-out such PRFM on cores that are affected by the TX2-219 erratum.
Cc <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Rather than backporting this, we need to look into backporting the rest of the errata fixes. I'll look into that...
Signature · 2 lines
Thanks, Sasha
Quoted 23 lines · Sasha Levin
Quoted 21 lines · On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 02:53:33PM +0100, [email protected] wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From
9405447ef79bc93101373e130f72e9e6cbf17dbbMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:22:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Avoid Cavium TX2 erratum 219 when switching TTBRAs a PRFM instruction racing against a TTBR update can have undesirable effects on TX2, NOP-out such PRFM on cores that are affected by the TX2-219 erratum.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Cc <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Will Deacon <[email protected]>Rather than backporting this, we need to look into backporting the rest of the errata fixes. I'll look into that...
Yup. On its own, this workaround is pretty useless.
I have a 4.19 backport [1] that needs some testing (I don't have access to a TX2 at the moment). 4.14 is "interesting" to backport (weird and wonderful dependencies), but I'm not sure 4.9 has any value for this HW (did it ever run 4.9?).
Thanks,
M.
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git/log/?h=stable-4.19/tx2-219
Signature · 1 line
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny.