Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: Avoid Cavium TX2 erratum 219 when switching TTBR" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 3 participants 3 messages Oct 27, 2019 – Oct 28, 2019

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 9405447ef79bc93101373e130f72e9e6cbf17dbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:22:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Avoid Cavium TX2 erratum 219 when switching TTBR

As a PRFM instruction racing against a TTBR update can have undesirable effects on TX2, NOP-out such PRFM on cores that are affected by the TX2-219 erratum.

arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h +2 -1
index e81e0cbd728f..ac1dbca3d0cd 100644
@@ -53,7 +53,8 @@
 #define ARM64_HAS_DCPODP			43
 #define ARM64_WORKAROUND_1463225		44
 #define ARM64_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_TX2_219_TVM	45
+#define ARM64_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_TX2_219_PRFM	46
 
-#define ARM64_NCAPS				46
+#define ARM64_NCAPS				47
 
 #endif /* __ASM_CPUCAPS_H */
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c +5 -0
index d999ca2dd760..a19bb3e4bcfb 100644
@@ -884,6 +884,11 @@ const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[] = {
 		ERRATA_MIDR_RANGE_LIST(tx2_family_cpus),
 		.matches = needs_tx2_tvm_workaround,
 	},
+	{
+		.desc = "Cavium ThunderX2 erratum 219 (PRFM removal)",
+		.capability = ARM64_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_TX2_219_PRFM,
+		ERRATA_MIDR_RANGE_LIST(tx2_family_cpus),
+	},
 #endif
 	{
 	}
arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S +2 -0
index 84a822748c84..109894bd3194 100644
@@ -1070,7 +1070,9 @@ alternative_insn isb, nop, ARM64_WORKAROUND_QCOM_FALKOR_E1003
 #else
 	ldr	x30, =vectors
 #endif
+alternative_if_not ARM64_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_TX2_219_PRFM
 	prfm	plil1strm, [x30, #(1b - tramp_vectors)]
+alternative_else_nop_endif
 	msr	vbar_el1, x30
 	add	x30, x30, #(1b - tramp_vectors)
 	isb
maintainer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 17 lines · On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 02:53:33PM +0100, [email protected] wrote:

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 9405447ef79bc93101373e130f72e9e6cbf17dbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:22:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Avoid Cavium TX2 erratum 219 when switching TTBR

Quoted 7 lines

As a PRFM instruction racing against a TTBR update can have undesirable effects on TX2, NOP-out such PRFM on cores that are affected by the TX2-219 erratum.

Rather than backporting this, we need to look into backporting the rest of the errata fixes. I'll look into that...

Signature · 2 lines
Thanks,
Sasha
#2 lore raw
Quoted 23 lines · Sasha Levin
Quoted 21 lines · On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 02:53:33PM +0100, [email protected] wrote:

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 9405447ef79bc93101373e130f72e9e6cbf17dbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:22:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Avoid Cavium TX2 erratum 219 when switching TTBR

As a PRFM instruction racing against a TTBR update can have undesirable effects on TX2, NOP-out such PRFM on cores that are affected by the TX2-219 erratum.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Rather than backporting this, we need to look into backporting the rest of the errata fixes. I'll look into that...

Yup. On its own, this workaround is pretty useless.

I have a 4.19 backport [1] that needs some testing (I don't have access to a TX2 at the moment). 4.14 is "interesting" to backport (weird and wonderful dependencies), but I'm not sure 4.9 has any value for this HW (did it ever run 4.9?).

Thanks,

	M.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git/log/?h=stable-4.19/tx2-219

Signature · 1 line
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny.