Skip to contentSkip to conversation

state: eMMC boot0-partitions backend for Linux

DISCUSSION Christoph Fritz 2 participants 2 messages Nov 3, 2019 – Nov 11, 2019

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi,

I would like to use emmc-hardware-partition boot1 as a state backend,
this has the charm of keeping the big hw-partition clean while using SLC for e.g. serial numbers.

Within barebox using an emmc-hardware-partition boot1 as a state backend just works!

But trying to hand over this backend to Linux fails right before starting the kernel:

WARNING: Failed to fixup node in of_state_fixup+0x1/0x288: No such device

I guess dt-utils also has no support for using /dev/mmcblk1boot0 as a backend (by default Linux doesn't allow to write to boot0/1) ?

What would be the best way to add this feature?

Any ideas?

-- Christoph

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

#1 lore raw

Hello Christoph,

Quoted 8 lines · Christoph Fritz

Hi,

I would like to use emmc-hardware-partition boot1 as a state backend,
this has the charm of keeping the big hw-partition clean while using SLC for e.g. serial numbers.
Within barebox using an emmc-hardware-partition boot1 as a state backend just works!

Quoted 4 lines

But trying to hand over this backend to Linux fails right before starting the kernel:

WARNING: Failed to fixup node in of_state_fixup+0x1/0x288: No such device

I ran into this before, but with the barebox environment.
I 'solved' it by moving the environment out of the boot partition.. See d5285342d87 ("mci: skip of_partitions_register_fixup for boot partitions").

Quoted 2 lines

I guess dt-utils also has no support for using /dev/mmcblk1boot0 as a backend (by default Linux doesn't allow to write to boot0/1) ?

Yes.

Quoted 3 lines

What would be the best way to add this feature?

Any ideas?

How about:
- formalize the eMMC boot partitions binding with
a compatible = "barebox,emmc-bootpart" and change barebox to fix it up into the kernel's device tree.
- have barebox_state handle this properly. You can check out how RAUC (LGPL-2.1) does it.

Cheers
Ahmad

Quoted 9 lines

-- Christoph

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

Signature · 9 lines
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox