Linux 4.19.157
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerI'm announcing the release of the 4.19.157 kernel.
Please see the 5.9.8 announcement if you are curious if you should upgrade or not:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
The updated 4.19.y git tree can be found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git linux-4.19.y
and can be browsed at the normal kernel.org git web browser:
https://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git;a=summary
thanks,
greg k-h
------------
Makefile | 2 +- drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Greg Kroah-Hartman (1):
Linux 4.19.157
Len Brown (1):
powercap: restrict energy meter to root access
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerMakefile +1 -1
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 VERSION = 4 PATCHLEVEL = 19 -SUBLEVEL = 156 +SUBLEVEL = 157 EXTRAVERSION = NAME = "People's Front"
drivers/powercap/powercap_sys.c +2 -2
@@ -379,9 +379,9 @@ static void create_power_zone_common_attributes( &dev_attr_max_energy_range_uj.attr;if (power_zone->ops->get_energy_uj) {if (power_zone->ops->reset_energy_uj) - dev_attr_energy_uj.attr.mode =S_IWUSR |S_IRUGO ; + dev_attr_energy_uj.attr.mode =S_IWUSR |S_IRUSR ;else - dev_attr_energy_uj.attr.mode =S_IRUGO ; + dev_attr_energy_uj.attr.mode =S_IRUSR ; power_zone->zone_dev_attrs[count++] = &dev_attr_energy_uj.attr; }
Re: Linux 4.19.157 -- fixing SGX problem?
In reply to Greg Kroah-HartmanHi!
Quoted 5 lines
I'm announcing the release of the 4.19.157 kernel.
Please see the 5.9.8 announcement if you are curious if you should upgrade or not:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
Quoting:
# Hint, if you are using SGX, then upgrade. And then possibly
# reconsider # the decisions you have recently made that caused you to write special # code to use that crazy thing. Personally, it still feels like a # solution in search of a problem.
I agree with you that SGX is "crazy", but this makes no sense.
SGX is expected to protect enclave even from root. How does making interface root-only solve that?
Plus, SGX is not in 4.19. I don't believe it is in mainline, either, as the patches are still reposted. We are at v40 now...
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 16:54:06 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
Subject: [PATCH v40 00/24] Intel SGX foundations
ls arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx shows nothing in mainline. It shows nothing in -next, either.
Confused,
Pavel
Signature · 1 line
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek