FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/userfaultfd: do not access vma->vm_mm after calling" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From bfe8cc1db02ab243c62780f17fc57f65bde0afe1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gerald Schaefer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 22:17:15 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] mm/userfaultfd: do not access vma->vm_mm after calling
handle_userfault()
Alexander reported a syzkaller / KASAN finding on s390, see below for complete output.
In do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(), the pre-allocated pagetable will be freed in some cases. In the case of userfaultfd_missing(), this will happen after calling handle_userfault(), which might have released the mmap_lock. Therefore, the following pte_free(vma->vm_mm, pgtable) will access an unstable vma->vm_mm, which could have been freed or re-used already.
For all architectures other than s390 this will go w/o any negative impact, because pte_free() simply frees the page and ignores the passed-in mm. The implementation for SPARC32 would also access mm->page_table_lock for pte_free(), but there is no THP support in SPARC32, so the buggy code path will not be used there.
For s390, the mm->context.pgtable_list is being used to maintain the 2K pagetable fragments, and operating on an already freed or even re-used mm could result in various more or less subtle bugs due to list / pagetable corruption.
Fix this by calling pte_free() before handle_userfault(), similar to how it is already done in __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page() for the WRITE / non-huge_zero_page case.
Commit 6b251fc96cf2c ("userfaultfd: call handle_userfault() for userfaultfd_missing() faults") actually introduced both, the do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page() and also __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page() changes wrt to calling handle_userfault(), but only in the latter case it put the pte_free() before calling handle_userfault().
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0xcda/0xd90 mm/huge_memory.c:744
Read of size 8 at addr 00000000962d6988 by task syz-executor.0/9334
CPU: 1 PID: 9334 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.10.0-rc1-syzkaller-07083-g4c9720875573 #0
Hardware name: IBM 3906 M04 701 (KVM/Linux)
Call Trace:
do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0xcda/0xd90 mm/huge_memory.c:744
create_huge_pmd mm/memory.c:4256 [inline]
__handle_mm_fault+0xe6e/0x1068 mm/memory.c:4480
handle_mm_fault+0x288/0x748 mm/memory.c:4607
do_exception+0x394/0xae0 arch/s390/mm/fault.c:479
do_dat_exception+0x34/0x80 arch/s390/mm/fault.c:567
pgm_check_handler+0x1da/0x22c arch/s390/kernel/entry.S:706
copy_from_user_mvcos arch/s390/lib/uaccess.c:111 [inline]
raw_copy_from_user+0x3a/0x88 arch/s390/lib/uaccess.c:174
_copy_from_user+0x48/0xa8 lib/usercopy.c:16
copy_from_user include/linux/uaccess.h:192 [inline]
__do_sys_sigaltstack kernel/signal.c:4064 [inline]
__s390x_sys_sigaltstack+0xc8/0x240 kernel/signal.c:4060
system_call+0xe0/0x28c arch/s390/kernel/entry.S:415
Allocated by task 9334:
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:2891 [inline]
slab_alloc mm/slub.c:2899 [inline]
kmem_cache_alloc+0x118/0x348 mm/slub.c:2904
vm_area_dup+0x9c/0x2b8 kernel/fork.c:356
__split_vma+0xba/0x560 mm/mmap.c:2742
split_vma+0xca/0x108 mm/mmap.c:2800
mlock_fixup+0x4ae/0x600 mm/mlock.c:550
apply_vma_lock_flags+0x2c6/0x398 mm/mlock.c:619
do_mlock+0x1aa/0x718 mm/mlock.c:711
__do_sys_mlock2 mm/mlock.c:738 [inline]
__s390x_sys_mlock2+0x86/0xa8 mm/mlock.c:728
system_call+0xe0/0x28c arch/s390/kernel/entry.S:415
Freed by task 9333:
slab_free mm/slub.c:3142 [inline]
kmem_cache_free+0x7c/0x4b8 mm/slub.c:3158
__vma_adjust+0x7b2/0x2508 mm/mmap.c:960
vma_merge+0x87e/0xce0 mm/mmap.c:1209
userfaultfd_release+0x412/0x6b8 fs/userfaultfd.c:868
__fput+0x22c/0x7a8 fs/file_table.c:281
task_work_run+0x200/0x320 kernel/task_work.c:151
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
do_notify_resume+0x100/0x148 arch/s390/kernel/signal.c:538
system_call+0xe6/0x28c arch/s390/kernel/entry.S:416
The buggy address belongs to the object at 00000000962d6948 which belongs to the cache vm_area_struct of size 200
The buggy address is located 64 bytes inside of 200-byte region [00000000962d6948, 00000000962d6a10)
The buggy address belongs to the page: page:00000000313a09fe refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x962d6 flags: 0x3ffff00000000200(slab)
raw: 3ffff00000000200 000040000257e080 0000000c0000000c 000000008020ba00
raw: 0000000000000000 000f001e00000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000096959501
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
page->mem_cgroup:0000000096959501
Memory state around the buggy address:
00000000962d6880: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00000000962d6900: 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fa fb fb fb fb fb fb
>00000000962d6980: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
^
00000000962d6a00: fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc 00 00 00 00 00 00
00000000962d6a80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
==================================================================mm/huge_memory.c +4 -5
@@ -710,7 +710,6 @@ vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) transparent_hugepage_use_zero_page()) {pgtable_t pgtable;struct page *zero_page; -bool set;vm_fault_t ret; pgtable =pte_alloc_one (vma->vm_mm);if (unlikely (!pgtable))
@@ -723,25 +722,25 @@ vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) } vmf->ptl =pmd_lock (vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd); ret =0 ; - set = false;if (pmd_none (*vmf->pmd)) { ret =check_stable_address_space (vma->vm_mm);if (ret) {spin_unlock (vmf->ptl); +pte_free (vma->vm_mm, pgtable); }else if (userfaultfd_missing (vma)) {spin_unlock (vmf->ptl); +pte_free (vma->vm_mm, pgtable); ret =handle_userfault (vmf,VM_UFFD_MISSING );VM_BUG_ON (ret &VM_FAULT_FALLBACK ); }else {set_huge_zero_page (pgtable, vma->vm_mm, vma, haddr, vmf->pmd, zero_page);spin_unlock (vmf->ptl); - set = true; } - }else + }else {spin_unlock (vmf->ptl); -if (!set)pte_free (vma->vm_mm, pgtable); + }return ret; } gfp =alloc_hugepage_direct_gfpmask (vma);
PATCH 1/1 mm/userfaultfd: do not access vma->vm_mm after calling handle_userfault()
commit bfe8cc1db02ab243c62780f17fc57f65bde0afe1 upstream.
Alexander reported a syzkaller / KASAN finding on s390, see below for complete output.
In do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(), the pre-allocated pagetable will be freed in some cases. In the case of userfaultfd_missing(), this will happen after calling handle_userfault(), which might have released the mmap_lock. Therefore, the following pte_free(vma->vm_mm, pgtable) will access an unstable vma->vm_mm, which could have been freed or re-used already.
For all architectures other than s390 this will go w/o any negative impact, because pte_free() simply frees the page and ignores the passed-in mm. The implementation for SPARC32 would also access mm->page_table_lock for pte_free(), but there is no THP support in SPARC32, so the buggy code path will not be used there.
For s390, the mm->context.pgtable_list is being used to maintain the 2K pagetable fragments, and operating on an already freed or even re-used mm could result in various more or less subtle bugs due to list / pagetable corruption.
Fix this by calling pte_free() before handle_userfault(), similar to how it is already done in __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page() for the WRITE / non-huge_zero_page case.
Commit 6b251fc96cf2c ("userfaultfd: call handle_userfault() for userfaultfd_missing() faults") actually introduced both, the do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page() and also __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page() changes wrt to calling handle_userfault(), but only in the latter case it put the pte_free() before calling handle_userfault().
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0xcda/0xd90 mm/huge_memory.c:744
Read of size 8 at addr 00000000962d6988 by task syz-executor.0/9334
CPU: 1 PID: 9334 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.10.0-rc1-syzkaller-07083-g4c9720875573 #0
Hardware name: IBM 3906 M04 701 (KVM/Linux)
Call Trace:
do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0xcda/0xd90 mm/huge_memory.c:744
create_huge_pmd mm/memory.c:4256 [inline]
__handle_mm_fault+0xe6e/0x1068 mm/memory.c:4480
handle_mm_fault+0x288/0x748 mm/memory.c:4607
do_exception+0x394/0xae0 arch/s390/mm/fault.c:479
do_dat_exception+0x34/0x80 arch/s390/mm/fault.c:567
pgm_check_handler+0x1da/0x22c arch/s390/kernel/entry.S:706
copy_from_user_mvcos arch/s390/lib/uaccess.c:111 [inline]
raw_copy_from_user+0x3a/0x88 arch/s390/lib/uaccess.c:174
_copy_from_user+0x48/0xa8 lib/usercopy.c:16
copy_from_user include/linux/uaccess.h:192 [inline]
__do_sys_sigaltstack kernel/signal.c:4064 [inline]
__s390x_sys_sigaltstack+0xc8/0x240 kernel/signal.c:4060
system_call+0xe0/0x28c arch/s390/kernel/entry.S:415
Allocated by task 9334:
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:2891 [inline]
slab_alloc mm/slub.c:2899 [inline]
kmem_cache_alloc+0x118/0x348 mm/slub.c:2904
vm_area_dup+0x9c/0x2b8 kernel/fork.c:356
__split_vma+0xba/0x560 mm/mmap.c:2742
split_vma+0xca/0x108 mm/mmap.c:2800
mlock_fixup+0x4ae/0x600 mm/mlock.c:550
apply_vma_lock_flags+0x2c6/0x398 mm/mlock.c:619
do_mlock+0x1aa/0x718 mm/mlock.c:711
__do_sys_mlock2 mm/mlock.c:738 [inline]
__s390x_sys_mlock2+0x86/0xa8 mm/mlock.c:728
system_call+0xe0/0x28c arch/s390/kernel/entry.S:415
Freed by task 9333:
slab_free mm/slub.c:3142 [inline]
kmem_cache_free+0x7c/0x4b8 mm/slub.c:3158
__vma_adjust+0x7b2/0x2508 mm/mmap.c:960
vma_merge+0x87e/0xce0 mm/mmap.c:1209
userfaultfd_release+0x412/0x6b8 fs/userfaultfd.c:868
__fput+0x22c/0x7a8 fs/file_table.c:281
task_work_run+0x200/0x320 kernel/task_work.c:151
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
do_notify_resume+0x100/0x148 arch/s390/kernel/signal.c:538
system_call+0xe6/0x28c arch/s390/kernel/entry.S:416
The buggy address belongs to the object at 00000000962d6948 which belongs to the cache vm_area_struct of size 200
The buggy address is located 64 bytes inside of 200-byte region [00000000962d6948, 00000000962d6a10)
The buggy address belongs to the page: page:00000000313a09fe refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x962d6 flags: 0x3ffff00000000200(slab)
raw: 3ffff00000000200 000040000257e080 0000000c0000000c 000000008020ba00
raw: 0000000000000000 000f001e00000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000096959501
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
page->mem_cgroup:0000000096959501
Memory state around the buggy address:
00000000962d6880: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00000000962d6900: 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fa fb fb fb fb fb fb
>00000000962d6980: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
^
00000000962d6a00: fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc 00 00 00 00 00 00
00000000962d6a80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
==================================================================---
Changes for v4.14 stable:
- Make it apply w/o
* Commit 4cf58924951ef ("mm: treewide: remove unused address argument from pte_alloc functions")
* Commit 2b7403035459c ("mm: Change return type int to vm_fault_t for fault handlers")
--- mm/huge_memory.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
mm/huge_memory.c +4 -5
@@ -688,7 +688,6 @@ int do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) transparent_hugepage_use_zero_page()) {pgtable_t pgtable;struct page *zero_page; -bool set;int ret; pgtable =pte_alloc_one (vma->vm_mm, haddr);if (unlikely (!pgtable))
@@ -701,25 +700,25 @@ int do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) } vmf->ptl =pmd_lock (vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd); ret =0 ; - set = false;if (pmd_none (*vmf->pmd)) { ret =check_stable_address_space (vma->vm_mm);if (ret) {spin_unlock (vmf->ptl); +pte_free (vma->vm_mm, pgtable); }else if (userfaultfd_missing (vma)) {spin_unlock (vmf->ptl); +pte_free (vma->vm_mm, pgtable); ret =handle_userfault (vmf,VM_UFFD_MISSING );VM_BUG_ON (ret &VM_FAULT_FALLBACK ); }else {set_huge_zero_page (pgtable, vma->vm_mm, vma, haddr, vmf->pmd, zero_page);spin_unlock (vmf->ptl); - set = true; } - }else + }else {spin_unlock (vmf->ptl); -if (!set)pte_free (vma->vm_mm, pgtable); + }return ret; } gfp =alloc_hugepage_direct_gfpmask (vma);
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerRe: [PATCH for v4.14] mm/userfaultfd: do not access vma->vm_mm after calling handle_userfault()
Quoted 4 lines · Gerald Schaefer
commit
bfe8cc1db02ab243c62780f17fc57f65bde0afe1upstream.Alexander reported a syzkaller / KASAN finding on s390, see below for complete output.
<snip>
Both backports now queued up, thanks.
greg k-h