Two changes related with UFS clock scaling
v2 cover Two changes related with UFS clock scaling
This series is made based on 5.11/scsi-fixes branch.
The 1st change allows contexts to prevent clock scaling from being invoked through sysfs nodes like clkscale_enable. The 2nd change is just a minor code cleanup.
Change since v1:
- Updated the 2nd change
Can Guo (2):
scsi: ufs: Protect some contexts from unexpected clock scaling
scsi: ufs: Clean up ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling/gating()
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 6 +++ 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
PATCH v2 1/2 scsi: ufs: Protect some contexts from unexpected clock scaling
In contexts like suspend, shutdown and error handling, we need to suspend devfreq to make sure these contexts won't be disturbed by clock scaling. However, suspending devfreq is not enough since users can still trigger a clock scaling by manipulating the sysfs node clkscale_enable and devfreq sysfs nodes like min/max_freq and governor. Add one more flag in struct clk_scaling such that these contexts can prevent clock scaling from being invoked through above sysfs nodes.
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +51 -35
@@ -1147,12 +1147,18 @@ static int ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare(struct ufs_hba *hba)*/ ufshcd_scsi_block_requests (hba);down_write (&hba->clk_scaling_lock); -if (ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr (hba,DOORBELL_CLR_TOUT_US )) { +if (!hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed || +ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr (hba,DOORBELL_CLR_TOUT_US )) { ret = -EBUSY ;up_write (&hba->clk_scaling_lock);ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests (hba); + goto out; } +/* let's not get into low power until clock scaling is completed */ +ufshcd_hold (hba, false); + +out:return ret; }
@@ -1160,6 +1166,7 @@ static void ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare(struct ufs_hba *hba) {up_write (&hba->clk_scaling_lock);ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests (hba); +ufshcd_release (hba); }/**
@@ -1175,12 +1182,9 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_scale(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up) {int ret =0 ; -/* let's not get into low power until clock scaling is completed */ -ufshcd_hold (hba, false); - ret =ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare (hba);if (ret) - goto out; +return ret;/* scale down the gear before scaling down clocks */ if (!scale_up) {
@@ -1212,8 +1216,6 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_scale(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up) out_unprepare:ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare (hba); -out: -ufshcd_release (hba);return ret; }
@@ -1294,15 +1296,8 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_target(struct device *dev, }spin_unlock_irqrestore (hba->host->host_lock, irq_flags); -pm_runtime_get_noresume (hba->dev); -if (!pm_runtime_active (hba->dev)) { -pm_runtime_put_noidle (hba->dev); - ret = -EAGAIN ; - goto out; - } start =ktime_get (); ret =ufshcd_devfreq_scale (hba, scale_up); -pm_runtime_put (hba->dev); trace_ufshcd_profile_clk_scaling(dev_name(hba->dev), (scale_up ? "up" : "down"),
@@ -1487,7 +1482,7 @@ static ssize_t ufshcd_clkscale_enable_show(struct device *dev, {struct ufs_hba *hba =dev_get_drvdata (dev); -return snprintf (buf,PAGE_SIZE ,"%d\n" , hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed); +return snprintf (buf,PAGE_SIZE ,"%d\n" , hba->clk_scaling.is_enabled); } static ssize_t ufshcd_clkscale_enable_store(struct device *dev,
@@ -1496,12 +1491,20 @@ static ssize_t ufshcd_clkscale_enable_store(struct device *dev,struct ufs_hba *hba =dev_get_drvdata (dev);u32 value;int err; +unsigned long flags; +bool update = true;if (kstrtou32 (buf,0 , &value))return -EINVAL ; value = !!value; -if (value == hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed) +spin_lock_irqsave (hba->host->host_lock, flags); +if (value == hba->clk_scaling.is_enabled) + update = false; +else + hba->clk_scaling.is_enabled = value; +spin_unlock_irqrestore (hba->host->host_lock, flags); +if (!update) goto out;pm_runtime_get_sync (hba->dev);
@@ -1510,8 +1513,6 @@ static ssize_t ufshcd_clkscale_enable_store(struct device *dev,cancel_work_sync (&hba->clk_scaling.suspend_work);cancel_work_sync (&hba->clk_scaling.resume_work); - hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed = value; -if (value) {ufshcd_resume_clkscaling (hba); }else {
@@ -1845,8 +1846,6 @@ static void ufshcd_init_clk_scaling(struct ufs_hba *hba)snprintf (wq_name,sizeof (wq_name),"ufs_clkscaling_%d" , hba->host->host_no); hba->clk_scaling.workq =create_singlethread_workqueue (wq_name); - -ufshcd_clkscaling_init_sysfs (hba); }static void ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling (struct ufs_hba *hba)
@@ -1854,6 +1853,8 @@ static void ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling(struct ufs_hba *hba)if (!ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported (hba))return ; +if (hba->devfreq) +device_remove_file (hba->dev, &hba->clk_scaling.enable_attr);destroy_workqueue (hba->clk_scaling.workq);ufshcd_devfreq_remove (hba); }
@@ -1918,7 +1919,7 @@ static void ufshcd_clk_scaling_start_busy(struct ufs_hba *hba)if (!hba->clk_scaling.active_reqs++) queue_resume_work = true; -if (!hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed || hba->pm_op_in_progress) +if (!hba->clk_scaling.is_enabled || hba->pm_op_in_progress)return ;if (queue_resume_work)
@@ -4987,7 +4988,8 @@ static void __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl(struct ufs_hba *hba,complete (hba->dev_cmd.complete); } } -if (ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported (hba)) +if (ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported (hba) && + hba->clk_scaling.active_reqs >0 ) hba->clk_scaling.active_reqs--; }
@@ -5650,18 +5652,25 @@ static void ufshcd_err_handling_prepare(struct ufs_hba *hba)ufshcd_vops_resume (hba,UFS_RUNTIME_PM ); }else {ufshcd_hold (hba, false); -if (hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed) { +if (hba->clk_scaling.is_enabled) {cancel_work_sync (&hba->clk_scaling.suspend_work);cancel_work_sync (&hba->clk_scaling.resume_work);ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling (hba); } } +down_write (&hba->clk_scaling_lock); + hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed = false; +up_write (&hba->clk_scaling_lock); }static void ufshcd_err_handling_unprepare (struct ufs_hba *hba) {ufshcd_release (hba); -if (hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed) + +down_write (&hba->clk_scaling_lock); + hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed = true; +up_write (&hba->clk_scaling_lock); +if (hba->clk_scaling.is_enabled)ufshcd_resume_clkscaling (hba);pm_runtime_put (hba->dev); }
@@ -7620,12 +7629,14 @@ static int ufshcd_add_lus(struct ufs_hba *hba) sizeof(struct ufs_pa_layer_attr)); hba->clk_scaling.saved_pwr_info.is_valid = true;if (!hba->devfreq) { + hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed = true; ret =ufshcd_devfreq_init (hba);if (ret) goto out; - } - hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed = true; + hba->clk_scaling.is_enabled = true; +ufshcd_clkscaling_init_sysfs (hba); + } }ufs_bsg_probe (hba);
@@ -8491,11 +8502,14 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)ufshcd_hold (hba, false); hba->clk_gating.is_suspended = true; -if (hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed) { +if (hba->clk_scaling.is_enabled) {cancel_work_sync (&hba->clk_scaling.suspend_work);cancel_work_sync (&hba->clk_scaling.resume_work);ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling (hba); } +down_write (&hba->clk_scaling_lock); + hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed = false; +up_write (&hba->clk_scaling_lock);if (req_dev_pwr_mode ==UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE && req_link_state ==UIC_LINK_ACTIVE_STATE ) {
@@ -8592,8 +8606,6 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op) goto out; set_link_active: -if (hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed) -ufshcd_resume_clkscaling (hba);ufshcd_vreg_set_hpm (hba);if (ufshcd_is_link_hibern8 (hba) && !ufshcd_uic_hibern8_exit (hba))ufshcd_set_link_active (hba);
@@ -8603,7 +8615,10 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)if (!ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode (hba,UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE ))ufshcd_disable_auto_bkops (hba); enable_gating: -if (hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed) +down_write (&hba->clk_scaling_lock); + hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed = true; +up_write (&hba->clk_scaling_lock); +if (hba->clk_scaling.is_enabled)ufshcd_resume_clkscaling (hba); hba->clk_gating.is_suspended = false; hba->dev_info.b_rpm_dev_flush_capable = false;
@@ -8701,7 +8716,10 @@ static int ufshcd_resume(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op) hba->clk_gating.is_suspended = false; -if (hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed) +down_write (&hba->clk_scaling_lock); + hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed = true; +up_write (&hba->clk_scaling_lock); +if (hba->clk_scaling.is_enabled)ufshcd_resume_clkscaling (hba);/* Enable Auto-Hibernate if configured */
@@ -8725,8 +8743,6 @@ static int ufshcd_resume(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)ufshcd_vreg_set_lpm (hba); disable_irq_and_vops_clks:ufshcd_disable_irq (hba); -if (hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed) -ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling (hba);ufshcd_setup_clocks (hba, false);if (ufshcd_is_clkgating_allowed (hba)) { hba->clk_gating.state =CLKS_OFF ;
@@ -8915,6 +8931,8 @@ int ufshcd_shutdown(struct ufs_hba *hba)pm_runtime_get_sync (hba->dev); +ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling (hba); + ret =ufshcd_suspend (hba,UFS_SHUTDOWN_PM ); out:if (ret)
@@ -8944,8 +8962,6 @@ void ufshcd_remove(struct ufs_hba *hba)ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling (hba);ufshcd_exit_clk_gating (hba); -if (ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported (hba)) -device_remove_file (hba->dev, &hba->clk_scaling.enable_attr);ufshcd_hba_exit (hba); }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (ufshcd_remove);
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h +2 -0
@@ -382,6 +382,7 @@ struct ufs_saved_pwr_info {* @workq: workqueue to schedule devfreq suspend/resume work * @suspend_work: worker to suspend devfreq * @resume_work: worker to resume devfreq +* @is_enabled: tracks if scaling is currently enabled or not * @is_allowed: tracks if scaling is currently allowed or not * @is_busy_started: tracks if busy period has started or not * @is_suspended: tracks if devfreq is suspended or not
@@ -396,6 +397,7 @@ struct ufs_clk_scaling {struct workqueue_struct *workq;struct work_struct suspend_work;struct work_struct resume_work; +bool is_enabled;bool is_allowed;bool is_busy_started;bool is_suspended;
Signature · 1 line
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Protect some contexts from unexpected clock scaling
Hi Can
Quoted 28 lines · Can Guo
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +1
-0@@ -1160,6 +1166,7 @@ static void ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare(struct ufs_hba *hba) {up_write (&hba->clk_scaling_lock);ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests (hba); +ufshcd_release (hba); }/**
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +0
-1@@ -1175,12 +1182,9 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_scale(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up) {int ret =0 ; -/* let's not get into low power until clock scaling is completed */
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +1
-3-ufshcd_hold (hba, false); - ret =ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare (hba);if (ret) - goto out; +return ret;/* scale down the gear before scaling down clocks */ if (!scale_up) {
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c static int ufshcd_devfreq_scale(struct ufs_hba · line 1221
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +0
-2@@ -1212,8 +1216,6 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_scale(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up) out_unprepare:ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare (hba); -out: -ufshcd_release (hba);return ret; }
I didn't understand why moving ufshcd_hold/ufshcd_release into ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare()/ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare().
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +0
-0@@ -1294,15 +1296,8 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_target(struct device *dev, }spin_unlock_irqrestore (hba->host->host_lock, irq_flags);
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c static int ufshcd_devfreq_target(struct device · line 1302
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +0
-7-pm_runtime_get_noresume (hba->dev); -if (!pm_runtime_active (hba->dev)) { -pm_runtime_put_noidle (hba->dev); - ret = -EAGAIN ; - goto out; - } start =ktime_get (); ret =ufshcd_devfreq_scale (hba, scale_up); -pm_runtime_put (hba->dev);
which branch are you working on? I didn't see this part codes in the branch 5.11/scsi-queue and 5.11/scsi-staging.
Bean
Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Protect some contexts from unexpected clock scaling
Quoted 33 lines · Bean Huo
Hi Can
Quoted 30 lines · Can Guo
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +1
-0@@ -1160,6 +1166,7 @@ static void ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare(struct ufs_hba *hba) {up_write (&hba->clk_scaling_lock);ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests (hba); +ufshcd_release (hba); }/**
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +0
-1@@ -1175,12 +1182,9 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_scale(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up) {int ret =0 ; -/* let's not get into low power until clock scaling is completed */
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +1
-3-ufshcd_hold (hba, false); - ret =ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare (hba);if (ret) - goto out; +return ret;/* scale down the gear before scaling down clocks */ if (!scale_up) {@@ -1212,8 +1216,6 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_scale(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up)
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c static int ufshcd_devfreq_scale(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up) · line 1220
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +0
-2out_unprepare:ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare (hba); -out: -ufshcd_release (hba);return ret; }I didn't understand why moving ufshcd_hold/ufshcd_release into ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare()/ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare().
Say you change devfreq's governor to performance after UFS host has entered runtime suspend.
governor_store
devfreq_performance_handler
update_devfreq
devfreq_set_target
ufshcd_devfreq_target
ufshcd_devfreq_scale
When ufshcd_devfreq_scale() calls ufshcd_hold() when host is already runtime suspended, guess what, NoC issues. So clk_scaling.is_allowed should be checked first.
Regards,
Can Guo.
Quoted 22 lines
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +0
-0@@ -1294,15 +1296,8 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_target(struct device *dev, }spin_unlock_irqrestore (hba->host->host_lock, irq_flags);drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c static int ufshcd_devfreq_target(struct device · line 1302
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +0
-7-pm_runtime_get_noresume (hba->dev); -if (!pm_runtime_active (hba->dev)) { -pm_runtime_put_noidle (hba->dev); - ret = -EAGAIN ; - goto out; - } start =ktime_get (); ret =ufshcd_devfreq_scale (hba, scale_up); -pm_runtime_put (hba->dev);which branch are you working on? I didn't see this part codes in the branch 5.11/scsi-queue and 5.11/scsi-staging.
Bean
Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Protect some contexts from unexpected clock scaling
In reply to Bean HuoQuoted 64 lines · Bean Huo
Hi Can
Quoted 28 lines · Can Guo
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +1
-0@@ -1160,6 +1166,7 @@ static void ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare(struct ufs_hba *hba) {up_write (&hba->clk_scaling_lock);ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests (hba); +ufshcd_release (hba); }/**
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +0
-1@@ -1175,12 +1182,9 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_scale(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up) {int ret =0 ; -/* let's not get into low power until clock scaling is completed */
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +1
-3-ufshcd_hold (hba, false); - ret =ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare (hba);if (ret) - goto out; +return ret;/* scale down the gear before scaling down clocks */ if (!scale_up) {drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c static int ufshcd_devfreq_scale(struct ufs_hba · line 1221
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +0
-2@@ -1212,8 +1216,6 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_scale(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up) out_unprepare:ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare (hba); -out: -ufshcd_release (hba);return ret; }I didn't understand why moving ufshcd_hold/ufshcd_release into ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare()/ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare().
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +0
-0@@ -1294,15 +1296,8 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_target(struct device *dev, }spin_unlock_irqrestore (hba->host->host_lock, irq_flags);drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c static int ufshcd_devfreq_target(struct device · line 1302
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +0
-7-pm_runtime_get_noresume (hba->dev); -if (!pm_runtime_active (hba->dev)) { -pm_runtime_put_noidle (hba->dev); - ret = -EAGAIN ; - goto out; - } start =ktime_get (); ret =ufshcd_devfreq_scale (hba, scale_up); -pm_runtime_put (hba->dev);which branch are you working on? I didn't see this part codes in the branch 5.11/scsi-queue and 5.11/scsi-staging.
Quoted 1 line
Bean
As I mentioned in my cover-letter, this is based on 5.11/scsi-fixes. These codes came from one of my earlier changes, but since this change can cover the old change's functionality, so I removed the codes.
Can Guo.
Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Protect some contexts from unexpected clock scaling
Quoted 65 lines · Can Guo
Quoted 64 lines · Bean Huo
Hi Can
Quoted 28 lines · Can Guo
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +1
-0@@ -1160,6 +1166,7 @@ static void ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare(struct ufs_hba *hba) {up_write (&hba->clk_scaling_lock);ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests (hba); +ufshcd_release (hba); }/**
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +0
-1@@ -1175,12 +1182,9 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_scale(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up) {int ret =0 ; -/* let's not get into low power until clock scaling is completed */
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +1
-3-ufshcd_hold (hba, false); - ret =ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare (hba);if (ret) - goto out; +return ret;/* scale down the gear before scaling down clocks */ if (!scale_up) {drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c static int ufshcd_devfreq_scale(struct ufs_hba · line 1221
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +0
-2@@ -1212,8 +1216,6 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_scale(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up) out_unprepare:ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare (hba); -out: -ufshcd_release (hba);return ret; }I didn't understand why moving ufshcd_hold/ufshcd_release into ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare()/ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare().
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +0
-0@@ -1294,15 +1296,8 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_target(struct device *dev, }spin_unlock_irqrestore (hba->host->host_lock, irq_flags);drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c static int ufshcd_devfreq_target(struct device · line 1302
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +0
-7-pm_runtime_get_noresume (hba->dev); -if (!pm_runtime_active (hba->dev)) { -pm_runtime_put_noidle (hba->dev); - ret = -EAGAIN ; - goto out; - } start =ktime_get (); ret =ufshcd_devfreq_scale (hba, scale_up); -pm_runtime_put (hba->dev);which branch are you working on? I didn't see this part codes in the branch 5.11/scsi-queue and 5.11/scsi-staging.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
Bean
As I mentioned in my cover-letter, this is based on 5.11/scsi-fixes. These codes came from one of my earlier changes, but since this change can cover the old change's functionality, so I removed the codes.
Can Guo.
Hi Bean,
Sorry for the typo, it is branch 5.10/scsi-fixes.
Thanks,
Can Guo.
PATCH v2 2/2 scsi: ufs: Clean up ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling/gating()
In reply to Can Guoufshcd_hba_exit() is always called after ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling() and ufshcd_exit_clk_gating(), so move ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling/gating() to ufshcd_hba_exit().
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +15 -17
@@ -1846,11 +1846,14 @@ static void ufshcd_init_clk_scaling(struct ufs_hba *hba)snprintf (wq_name,sizeof (wq_name),"ufs_clkscaling_%d" , hba->host->host_no); hba->clk_scaling.workq =create_singlethread_workqueue (wq_name); + + hba->clk_scaling.is_initialized = true; }static void ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling (struct ufs_hba *hba) { -if (!ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported (hba)) +if (!ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported (hba) || + !hba->clk_scaling.is_initialized)return ;if (hba->devfreq)
@@ -1894,12 +1897,16 @@ static void ufshcd_init_clk_gating(struct ufs_hba *hba) hba->clk_gating.enable_attr.attr.mode =0644 ;if (device_create_file (hba->dev, &hba->clk_gating.enable_attr))dev_err (hba->dev,"Failed to create sysfs for clkgate_enable\n" ); + + hba->clk_gating.is_initialized = true; }static void ufshcd_exit_clk_gating (struct ufs_hba *hba) { -if (!ufshcd_is_clkgating_allowed (hba)) +if (!ufshcd_is_clkgating_allowed (hba) || + !hba->clk_gating.is_initialized)return ; +device_remove_file (hba->dev, &hba->clk_gating.delay_attr);device_remove_file (hba->dev, &hba->clk_gating.enable_attr);cancel_work_sync (&hba->clk_gating.ungate_work);
@@ -7764,7 +7771,6 @@ static void ufshcd_async_scan(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie)*/ if (ret) {pm_runtime_put_sync (hba->dev); -ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling (hba);ufshcd_hba_exit (hba); } }
@@ -8201,12 +8207,12 @@ static int ufshcd_hba_init(struct ufs_hba *hba)static void ufshcd_hba_exit (struct ufs_hba *hba) {if (hba->is_powered) { +ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling (hba); +ufshcd_exit_clk_gating (hba); +if (hba->eh_wq) +destroy_workqueue (hba->eh_wq);ufshcd_variant_hba_exit (hba);ufshcd_setup_vreg (hba, false); -ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling (hba); -if (ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported (hba)) -if (hba->devfreq) -ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling (hba);ufshcd_setup_clocks (hba, false);ufshcd_setup_hba_vreg (hba, false); hba->is_powered = false;
@@ -8955,13 +8961,9 @@ void ufshcd_remove(struct ufs_hba *hba)blk_mq_free_tag_set (&hba->tmf_tag_set);blk_cleanup_queue (hba->cmd_queue);scsi_remove_host (hba->host); -destroy_workqueue (hba->eh_wq);/* disable interrupts */ ufshcd_disable_intr (hba, hba->intr_mask);ufshcd_hba_stop (hba); - -ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling (hba); -ufshcd_exit_clk_gating (hba);ufshcd_hba_exit (hba); }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (ufshcd_remove);
@@ -9160,7 +9162,7 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq) err =devm_request_irq (dev, irq, ufshcd_intr,IRQF_SHARED ,UFSHCD , hba);if (err) {dev_err (hba->dev,"request irq failed\n" ); - goto exit_gating; + goto out_disable; }else { hba->is_irq_enabled = true; }
@@ -9168,7 +9170,7 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq) err =scsi_add_host (host, hba->dev);if (err) {dev_err (hba->dev,"scsi_add_host failed\n" ); - goto exit_gating; + goto out_disable; } hba->cmd_queue =blk_mq_init_queue (&hba->host->tag_set);
@@ -9251,10 +9253,6 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)blk_cleanup_queue (hba->cmd_queue); out_remove_scsi_host:scsi_remove_host (hba->host); -exit_gating: -ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling (hba); -ufshcd_exit_clk_gating (hba); -destroy_workqueue (hba->eh_wq); out_disable: hba->is_irq_enabled = false;ufshcd_hba_exit (hba);
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h +4 -0
@@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ enum clk_gating_state {* @delay_attr: sysfs attribute to control delay_attr * @enable_attr: sysfs attribute to enable/disable clock gating * @is_enabled: Indicates the current status of clock gating +* @is_initialized: Indicates whether clock gating is initialized or not * @active_reqs: number of requests that are pending and should be waited for * completion before gating clocks. */
@@ -359,6 +360,7 @@ struct ufs_clk_gating {struct device_attribute delay_attr;struct device_attribute enable_attr;bool is_enabled; +bool is_initialized;int active_reqs;struct workqueue_struct *clk_gating_workq; };
@@ -384,6 +386,7 @@ struct ufs_saved_pwr_info {* @resume_work: worker to resume devfreq * @is_enabled: tracks if scaling is currently enabled or not * @is_allowed: tracks if scaling is currently allowed or not +* @is_initialized: Indicates whether clock scaling is initialized or not * @is_busy_started: tracks if busy period has started or not * @is_suspended: tracks if devfreq is suspended or not */
@@ -399,6 +402,7 @@ struct ufs_clk_scaling {struct work_struct resume_work;bool is_enabled;bool is_allowed; +bool is_initialized;bool is_busy_started;bool is_suspended; };
Signature · 1 line
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: ufs: Clean up ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling/gating()
Quoted 30 lines · Can Guo
ufshcd_hba_exit()is always called afterufshcd_exit_clk_scaling()andufshcd_exit_clk_gating(), so move ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling/gating() toufshcd_hba_exit().Signed-off-by Can Guo <[email protected]>drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +4
-1@@ -1846,11 +1846,14 @@ static void ufshcd_init_clk_scaling(struct ufs_hba *hba) snprintf(wq_name, sizeof(wq_name), "ufs_clkscaling_%d", hba->host->host_no); hba->clk_scaling.workq =create_singlethread_workqueue (wq_name); + + hba->clk_scaling.is_initialized = true; }static void ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling (struct ufs_hba *hba) { -if (!ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported (hba)) +if (!ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported (hba) || + !hba->clk_scaling.is_initialized)return ;if (hba->devfreq)
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c static void ufshcd_init_clk_gating(struct · line 1905
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +2
-0@@ -1894,12 +1897,16 @@ static void ufshcd_init_clk_gating(struct ufs_hba *hba) hba->clk_gating.enable_attr.attr.mode = 0644;if (device_create_file (hba->dev, &hba- >clk_gating.enable_attr))dev_err (hba->dev,"Failed to create sysfs for clkgate_enable\n"); + + hba->clk_gating.is_initialized = true; }
you don't need these two is_initialized at all. they are only be false when scaling/gating is not supported??
Bean
Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: ufs: Clean up ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling/gating()
Quoted 41 lines · Bean Huo
Quoted 30 lines · Can Guo
ufshcd_hba_exit()is always called afterufshcd_exit_clk_scaling()andufshcd_exit_clk_gating(), so move ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling/gating() toufshcd_hba_exit().Signed-off-by Can Guo <[email protected]>drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +4
-1@@ -1846,11 +1846,14 @@ static void ufshcd_init_clk_scaling(struct ufs_hba *hba) snprintf(wq_name, sizeof(wq_name), "ufs_clkscaling_%d", hba->host->host_no); hba->clk_scaling.workq =create_singlethread_workqueue (wq_name); + + hba->clk_scaling.is_initialized = true; }static void ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling (struct ufs_hba *hba) { -if (!ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported (hba)) +if (!ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported (hba) || + !hba->clk_scaling.is_initialized)return ;if (hba->devfreq)drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c static void ufshcd_init_clk_gating(struct · line 1905
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +2
-0@@ -1894,12 +1897,16 @@ static void ufshcd_init_clk_gating(struct ufs_hba *hba) hba->clk_gating.enable_attr.attr.mode = 0644;if (device_create_file (hba->dev, &hba- >clk_gating.enable_attr))dev_err (hba->dev,"Failed to create sysfs for clkgate_enable\n"); + + hba->clk_gating.is_initialized = true; }
Quoted 4 lines
you don't need these two
is_initializedat all. they are only be false when scaling/gating is not supported??Bean
In the case of scaling/gating are supported, the flags are used in ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling/gating() - when ufshcd_hba_exit() calls ufshcd_exit_clk_scaling/gating(), the two funcs need to make sure they really have something to remove, otherwise NULL pointer issues.
Can Guo.