Skip to contentSkip to conversation

bridge: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO instead if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR

PATCH In review Jiapeng Zhong 2 participants 2 messages Jan 22, 2021

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 bridge: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO instead if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR

coccicheck suggested using PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() and looking at the code.

Fix the following coccicheck warnings:

./net/bridge/br_multicast.c:1295:7-13: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be used.

---
 net/bridge/br_multicast.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
net/bridge/br_multicast.c +1 -1
index 257ac4e..2229d10 100644
@@ -1292,7 +1292,7 @@ static int br_multicast_add_group(struct net_bridge *br,
 	pg = __br_multicast_add_group(br, port, group, src, filter_mode,
 				      igmpv2_mldv1, false);
 	/* NULL is considered valid for host joined groups */
-	err = IS_ERR(pg) ? PTR_ERR(pg) : 0;
+	err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pg);
 	spin_unlock(&br->multicast_lock);
 
 	return err;
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
maintainer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines · On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 17:32:13 +0800 Jiapeng Zhong wrote:

coccicheck suggested using PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() and looking at the code.

Fix the following coccicheck warnings:

./net/bridge/br_multicast.c:1295:7-13: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be used.

You need to CC netdev