FAILED: patch "[PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change intel_pstate_get_hwp_max()" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From a45ee4d4e13b0e35a8ec7ea0bf9267243d57b302 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 19:43:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Change intel_pstate_get_hwp_max()
argument
All of the callers of intel_pstate_get_hwp_max() access the struct cpudata object that corresponds to the given CPU already and the function itself needs to access that object (in order to update hwp_cap_cached), so modify the code to pass a struct cpudata pointer to it instead of the CPU number.
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c +8 -8
@@ -819,13 +819,13 @@ static struct freq_attr *hwp_cpufreq_attrs[] = { NULL, }; -static void intel_pstate_get_hwp_max (unsigned int cpu,int *phy_max, +static void intel_pstate_get_hwp_max (struct cpudata *cpu,int *phy_max,int *current_max) {u64 cap; -rdmsrl_on_cpu (cpu,MSR_HWP_CAPABILITIES , &cap); -WRITE_ONCE (all_cpu_data[cpu]->hwp_cap_cached, cap); +rdmsrl_on_cpu (cpu->cpu,MSR_HWP_CAPABILITIES , &cap); +WRITE_ONCE (cpu->hwp_cap_cached, cap);if (global.no_turbo || global.turbo_disabled) *current_max =HWP_GUARANTEED_PERF (cap);else
@@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@ static void update_qos_request(enum freq_qos_req_type type)continue ;if (hwp_active) -intel_pstate_get_hwp_max (i, &turbo_max, &max_state); +intel_pstate_get_hwp_max (cpu, &turbo_max, &max_state);else turbo_max = cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate;
@@ -1723,7 +1723,7 @@ static void intel_pstate_get_cpu_pstates(struct cpudata *cpu)if (hwp_active && !hwp_mode_bdw) {unsigned int phy_max, current_max; -intel_pstate_get_hwp_max (cpu->cpu, &phy_max, ¤t_max); +intel_pstate_get_hwp_max (cpu, &phy_max, ¤t_max); cpu->pstate.turbo_freq = phy_max * cpu->pstate.scaling; cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate = phy_max; }else {
@@ -2208,7 +2208,7 @@ static void intel_pstate_update_perf_limits(struct cpudata *cpu,* rather than pure ratios. */ if (hwp_active) { -intel_pstate_get_hwp_max (cpu->cpu, &turbo_max, &max_state); +intel_pstate_get_hwp_max (cpu, &turbo_max, &max_state); }else { max_state = global.no_turbo || global.turbo_disabled ? cpu->pstate.max_pstate : cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate;
@@ -2323,7 +2323,7 @@ static void intel_pstate_verify_cpu_policy(struct cpudata *cpu,if (hwp_active) {int max_state, turbo_max; -intel_pstate_get_hwp_max (cpu->cpu, &turbo_max, &max_state); +intel_pstate_get_hwp_max (cpu, &turbo_max, &max_state); max_freq = max_state * cpu->pstate.scaling; }else { max_freq =intel_pstate_get_max_freq (cpu);
@@ -2710,7 +2710,7 @@ static int intel_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)if (hwp_active) {u64 value; -intel_pstate_get_hwp_max (policy->cpu, &turbo_max, &max_state); +intel_pstate_get_hwp_max (cpu, &turbo_max, &max_state); policy->transition_delay_us =INTEL_CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_DELAY_HWP ;rdmsrl_on_cpu (cpu->cpu,MSR_HWP_REQUEST , &value);WRITE_ONCE (cpu->hwp_req_cached, value);