Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] powerpc/sstep: Fix incorrect return from analyze_instr()" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

PATCH New [email protected] 2 participants 3 messages Mar 1, 2021 – Mar 4, 2021

Subsystems (2)
Stable branch PowerPC
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 718aae916fa6619c57c348beaedd675835cf1aa1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 18:36:43 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/sstep: Fix incorrect return from analyze_instr()

We currently just percolate the return value from analyze_instr() to the caller of emulate_step(), especially if it is a -1.

For one particular case (opcode = 4) for instructions that aren't currently emulated, we are returning 'should not be single-stepped' while we should have returned 0 which says 'did not emulate, may have to single-step'.

Fixes 930d6288a26787 ("powerpc: sstep: Add support for maddhd, maddhdu, maddld instructions")
Signed-off-by Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[email protected]>
Suggested-by Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Tested-by Naveen N. Rao <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by Sandipan Das <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] open here
arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c +6 -1
index f859cbbb6375..e96cff845ef7 100644
@@ -1445,6 +1445,11 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 
 #ifdef __powerpc64__
 	case 4:
+		/*
+		 * There are very many instructions with this primary opcode
+		 * introduced in the ISA as early as v2.03. However, the ones
+		 * we currently emulate were all introduced with ISA 3.0
+		 */
 		if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
 			goto unknown_opcode;
 

@@ -1472,7 +1477,7 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 		 * There are other instructions from ISA 3.0 with the same
 		 * primary opcode which do not have emulation support yet.
 		 */
-		return -1;
+		goto unknown_opcode;
 #endif
 
 	case 7:		/* mulli */
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/2 powerpc/sstep: Check instruction validity against ISA version before emulation

From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 8813ff49607eab3caaf40fe8929b0ce7dc68e85f ]

We currently unconditionally try to emulate newer instructions on older Power versions that could cause issues. Gate it.

Fixes 350779a29f11 ("powerpc: Handle most loads and stores in instruction emulation code")
Signed-off-by Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] open here
[Dropped a few missing hunks for the backport to v5.10]
Signed-off-by Naveen N. Rao <[email protected]>
---
 arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c +59 -13
index b18bce1a209fad..2f9ece48b49a09 100644
@@ -1241,9 +1241,11 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 		if ((word & 0xfe2) == 2)
 			op->type = SYSCALL;
 		else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64) &&
-				(word & 0xfe3) == 1)
+				(word & 0xfe3) == 1) {	/* scv */
 			op->type = SYSCALL_VECTORED_0;
-		else
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
+		} else
 			op->type = UNKNOWN;
 		return 0;
 #endif

@@ -1347,7 +1349,7 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 #ifdef __powerpc64__
 	case 1:
 		if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
-			return -1;
+			goto unknown_opcode;
 
 		prefix_r = GET_PREFIX_R(word);
 		ra = GET_PREFIX_RA(suffix);

@@ -1381,7 +1383,7 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 #ifdef __powerpc64__
 	case 4:
 		if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
-			return -1;
+			goto unknown_opcode;
 
 		switch (word & 0x3f) {
 		case 48:	/* maddhd */

@@ -1467,6 +1469,8 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 	case 19:
 		if (((word >> 1) & 0x1f) == 2) {
 			/* addpcis */
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			imm = (short) (word & 0xffc1);	/* d0 + d2 fields */
 			imm |= (word >> 15) & 0x3e;	/* d1 field */
 			op->val = regs->nip + (imm << 16) + 4;

@@ -1779,7 +1783,7 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 #ifdef __powerpc64__
 		case 265:	/* modud */
 			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
-				return -1;
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->val = regs->gpr[ra] % regs->gpr[rb];
 			goto compute_done;
 #endif

@@ -1789,7 +1793,7 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 
 		case 267:	/* moduw */
 			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
-				return -1;
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->val = (unsigned int) regs->gpr[ra] %
 				(unsigned int) regs->gpr[rb];
 			goto compute_done;

@@ -1826,7 +1830,7 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 #endif
 		case 755:	/* darn */
 			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
-				return -1;
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			switch (ra & 0x3) {
 			case 0:
 				/* 32-bit conditioned */

@@ -1848,14 +1852,14 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 #ifdef __powerpc64__
 		case 777:	/* modsd */
 			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
-				return -1;
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->val = (long int) regs->gpr[ra] %
 				(long int) regs->gpr[rb];
 			goto compute_done;
 #endif
 		case 779:	/* modsw */
 			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
-				return -1;
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->val = (int) regs->gpr[ra] %
 				(int) regs->gpr[rb];
 			goto compute_done;

@@ -1932,14 +1936,14 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 #endif
 		case 538:	/* cnttzw */
 			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
-				return -1;
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			val = (unsigned int) regs->gpr[rd];
 			op->val = (val ? __builtin_ctz(val) : 32);
 			goto logical_done;
 #ifdef __powerpc64__
 		case 570:	/* cnttzd */
 			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
-				return -1;
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			val = regs->gpr[rd];
 			op->val = (val ? __builtin_ctzl(val) : 64);
 			goto logical_done;

@@ -2049,7 +2053,7 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 		case 890:	/* extswsli with sh_5 = 0 */
 		case 891:	/* extswsli with sh_5 = 1 */
 			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
-				return -1;
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->type = COMPUTE + SETREG;
 			sh = rb | ((word & 2) << 4);
 			val = (signed int) regs->gpr[rd];

@@ -2376,6 +2380,8 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 			break;
 
 		case 268:	/* lxvx */
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
 			op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 16);
 			op->element_size = 16;

@@ -2385,6 +2391,8 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 		case 269:	/* lxvl */
 		case 301: {	/* lxvll */
 			int nb;
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
 			op->ea = ra ? regs->gpr[ra] : 0;
 			nb = regs->gpr[rb] & 0xff;

@@ -2404,6 +2412,8 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 			break;
 
 		case 364:	/* lxvwsx */
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
 			op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 4);
 			op->element_size = 4;

@@ -2411,6 +2421,8 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 			break;
 
 		case 396:	/* stxvx */
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
 			op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 16);
 			op->element_size = 16;

@@ -2420,6 +2432,8 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 		case 397:	/* stxvl */
 		case 429: {	/* stxvll */
 			int nb;
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
 			op->ea = ra ? regs->gpr[ra] : 0;
 			nb = regs->gpr[rb] & 0xff;

@@ -2464,6 +2478,8 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 			break;
 
 		case 781:	/* lxsibzx */
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
 			op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 1);
 			op->element_size = 8;

@@ -2471,6 +2487,8 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 			break;
 
 		case 812:	/* lxvh8x */
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
 			op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 16);
 			op->element_size = 2;

@@ -2478,6 +2496,8 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 			break;
 
 		case 813:	/* lxsihzx */
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
 			op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 2);
 			op->element_size = 8;

@@ -2491,6 +2511,8 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 			break;
 
 		case 876:	/* lxvb16x */
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
 			op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 16);
 			op->element_size = 1;

@@ -2504,6 +2526,8 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 			break;
 
 		case 909:	/* stxsibx */
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
 			op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 1);
 			op->element_size = 8;

@@ -2511,6 +2535,8 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 			break;
 
 		case 940:	/* stxvh8x */
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
 			op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 16);
 			op->element_size = 2;

@@ -2518,6 +2544,8 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 			break;
 
 		case 941:	/* stxsihx */
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
 			op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 2);
 			op->element_size = 8;

@@ -2531,6 +2559,8 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 			break;
 
 		case 1004:	/* stxvb16x */
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->reg = rd | ((word & 1) << 5);
 			op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 16);
 			op->element_size = 1;

@@ -2639,12 +2669,16 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 			op->type = MKOP(LOAD_FP, 0, 16);
 			break;
 		case 2:		/* lxsd */
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->reg = rd + 32;
 			op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 8);
 			op->element_size = 8;
 			op->vsx_flags = VSX_CHECK_VEC;
 			break;
 		case 3:		/* lxssp */
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->reg = rd + 32;
 			op->type = MKOP(LOAD_VSX, 0, 4);
 			op->element_size = 8;

@@ -2681,6 +2715,8 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 			break;
 
 		case 1:		/* lxv */
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->ea = dqform_ea(word, regs);
 			if (word & 8)
 				op->reg = rd + 32;

@@ -2691,6 +2727,8 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 
 		case 2:		/* stxsd with LSB of DS field = 0 */
 		case 6:		/* stxsd with LSB of DS field = 1 */
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->ea = dsform_ea(word, regs);
 			op->reg = rd + 32;
 			op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 8);

@@ -2700,6 +2738,8 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 
 		case 3:		/* stxssp with LSB of DS field = 0 */
 		case 7:		/* stxssp with LSB of DS field = 1 */
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->ea = dsform_ea(word, regs);
 			op->reg = rd + 32;
 			op->type = MKOP(STORE_VSX, 0, 4);

@@ -2708,6 +2748,8 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 			break;
 
 		case 5:		/* stxv */
+			if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+				goto unknown_opcode;
 			op->ea = dqform_ea(word, regs);
 			if (word & 8)
 				op->reg = rd + 32;

@@ -2737,7 +2779,7 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 		break;
 	case 1: /* Prefixed instructions */
 		if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
-			return -1;
+			goto unknown_opcode;
 
 		prefix_r = GET_PREFIX_R(word);
 		ra = GET_PREFIX_RA(suffix);

@@ -2872,6 +2914,10 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 
 	return 0;
 
+ unknown_opcode:
+	op->type = UNKNOWN;
+	return 0;
+
  logical_done:
 	if (word & 1)
 		set_cr0(regs, op);

base-commit: 83be32b6c9e55d5b04181fc9788591d5611d4a96

Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
#2 lore raw

PATCH 2/2 powerpc/sstep: Fix incorrect return from analyze_instr()

In reply to [email protected]

From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 718aae916fa6619c57c348beaedd675835cf1aa1 ]

We currently just percolate the return value from analyze_instr() to the caller of emulate_step(), especially if it is a -1.

For one particular case (opcode = 4) for instructions that aren't currently emulated, we are returning 'should not be single-stepped' while we should have returned 0 which says 'did not emulate, may have to single-step'.

Fixes 930d6288a26787 ("powerpc: sstep: Add support for maddhd, maddhdu, maddld instructions")
Signed-off-by Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[email protected]>
Suggested-by Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Tested-by Naveen N. Rao <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by Sandipan Das <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] open here
Signed-off-by Naveen N. Rao <[email protected]>
---
 arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c +6 -1
index 2f9ece48b49a09..242bdd8281e0fd 100644
@@ -1382,6 +1382,11 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 
 #ifdef __powerpc64__
 	case 4:
+		/*
+		 * There are very many instructions with this primary opcode
+		 * introduced in the ISA as early as v2.03. However, the ones
+		 * we currently emulate were all introduced with ISA 3.0
+		 */
 		if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
 			goto unknown_opcode;
 

@@ -1409,7 +1414,7 @@ int analyse_instr(struct instruction_op *op, const struct pt_regs *regs,
 		 * There are other instructions from ISA 3.0 with the same
 		 * primary opcode which do not have emulation support yet.
 		 */
-		return -1;
+		goto unknown_opcode;
 #endif
 
 	case 7:		/* mulli */
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1