Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net: dsa: microchip: fix bridging with more than two member" failed to apply to 5.16-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 2 participants 5 messages Feb 25, 2022 – Feb 28, 2022 1 message not in the archive

Subsystems (4)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 5.16-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 3d00827a90db6f79abc7cdc553887f89a2e0a184 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Svenning=20S=C3=B8rensen?= <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 11:27:01 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] net: dsa: microchip: fix bridging with more than two member
ports
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Commit b3612ccdf284 ("net: dsa: microchip: implement multi-bridge support") plugged a packet leak between ports that were members of different bridges. Unfortunately, this broke another use case, namely that of more than two ports that are members of the same bridge.

After that commit, when a port is added to a bridge, hardware bridging between other member ports of that bridge will be cleared, preventing packet exchange between them.

Fix by ensuring that the Port VLAN Membership bitmap includes any existing ports in the bridge, not just the port being added.

Fixes b3612ccdf284 ("net: dsa: microchip: implement multi-bridge support")
drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c +23 -3
index 55dbda04ea62..243f8ad6d06e 100644
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ void ksz_update_port_member(struct ksz_device *dev, int port)
 	struct dsa_switch *ds = dev->ds;
 	u8 port_member = 0, cpu_port;
 	const struct dsa_port *dp;
-	int i;
+	int i, j;
 
 	if (!dsa_is_user_port(ds, port))
 		return;
@@ -45,13 +45,33 @@ void ksz_update_port_member(struct ksz_device *dev, int port)
 			continue;
 		if (!dsa_port_bridge_same(dp, other_dp))
 			continue;
+		if (other_p->stp_state != BR_STATE_FORWARDING)
+			continue;
 
-		if (other_p->stp_state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING &&
-		    p->stp_state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING) {
+		if (p->stp_state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING) {
 			val |= BIT(port);
 			port_member |= BIT(i);
 		}
 
+		/* Retain port [i]'s relationship to other ports than [port] */
+		for (j = 0; j < ds->num_ports; j++) {
+			const struct dsa_port *third_dp;
+			struct ksz_port *third_p;
+
+			if (j == i)
+				continue;
+			if (j == port)
+				continue;
+			if (!dsa_is_user_port(ds, j))
+				continue;
+			third_p = &dev->ports[j];
+			if (third_p->stp_state != BR_STATE_FORWARDING)
+				continue;
+			third_dp = dsa_to_port(ds, j);
+			if (dsa_port_bridge_same(other_dp, third_dp))
+				val |= BIT(j);
+		}
+
 		dev->dev_ops->cfg_port_member(dev, i, val | cpu_port);
 	}
 
#1 lore raw
Quoted 4 lines · gregkh@linuxfoundation wrote:
Quoted 4 lines

The patch below does not apply to the 5.16-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

...

Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 3d00827a90db6f79abc7cdc553887f89a2e0a184 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

Hi Greg,

That's strange - it applies just fine without errors here:

--- snip ---

$ git log --oneline -n 1
f40e0f7a433b (HEAD -> linux-5.16.y, tag: v5.16.11, stable/linux-5.16.y) Linux 5.16.11
$ git cherry-pick -x 3d00827a90db6f79abc7cdc553887f89a2e0a184
[linux-5.16.y e1e17aca71a0] net: dsa: microchip: fix bridging with more than two member ports
 Date: Fri Feb 18 11:27:01 2022 +0000
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- snip ---

So I'm not sure what's needed for backporting?

Best regards,
Svenning Sørensen

author maintainer
#2 lore raw
Quoted 23 lines · Svenning Sørensen
Quoted 4 lines · gregkh@linuxfoundation wrote:
Quoted 4 lines

The patch below does not apply to the 5.16-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

...

Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

Quoted 1 line

From 3d00827a90db6f79abc7cdc553887f89a2e0a184 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

Hi Greg,

That's strange - it applies just fine without errors here:

--- snip ---

$ git log --oneline -n 1
f40e0f7a433b (HEAD -> linux-5.16.y, tag: v5.16.11, stable/linux-5.16.y) Linux 5.16.11
$ git cherry-pick -x 3d00827a90db6f79abc7cdc553887f89a2e0a184
[linux-5.16.y e1e17aca71a0] net: dsa: microchip: fix bridging with more than two member ports
 Date: Fri Feb 18 11:27:01 2022 +0000
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- snip ---
Quoted 1 line

So I'm not sure what's needed for backporting?

Try building it :)

Tested-by Oleksij Rempel
#4 lore raw
In reply to a message not in the archive

Commit b3612ccdf284 ("net: dsa: microchip: implement multi-bridge support") plugged a packet leak between ports that were members of different bridges. Unfortunately, this broke another use case, namely that of more than two ports that are members of the same bridge.

After that commit, when a port is added to a bridge, hardware bridging between other member ports of that bridge will be cleared, preventing packet exchange between them.

Fix by ensuring that the Port VLAN Membership bitmap includes any existing ports in the bridge, not just the port being added.

Upstream commit 3d00827a90db6f79abc7cdc553887f89a2e0a184, backported to 5.16.

Fixes b3612ccdf284 ("net: dsa: microchip: implement multi-bridge support")
---
 drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c +23 -3
index 8a04302018dc..7ab9ab58de65 100644
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ void ksz_update_port_member(struct ksz_device *dev, int port)
        struct dsa_switch *ds = dev->ds;
        u8 port_member = 0, cpu_port;
        const struct dsa_port *dp;
-       int i;
+       int i, j;
 
        if (!dsa_is_user_port(ds, port))
                return;
@@ -45,13 +45,33 @@ void ksz_update_port_member(struct ksz_device *dev, int port)
                        continue;
                if (!dp->bridge_dev || dp->bridge_dev != other_dp->bridge_dev)
                        continue;
+               if (other_p->stp_state != BR_STATE_FORWARDING)
+                       continue;
 
-               if (other_p->stp_state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING &&
-                   p->stp_state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING) {
+               if (p->stp_state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING) {
                        val |= BIT(port);
                        port_member |= BIT(i);
                }
 
+               /* Retain port [i]'s relationship to other ports than [port] */
+               for (j = 0; j < ds->num_ports; j++) {
+                       const struct dsa_port *third_dp;
+                       struct ksz_port *third_p;
+
+                       if (j == i)
+                               continue;
+                       if (j == port)
+                               continue;
+                       if (!dsa_is_user_port(ds, j))
+                               continue;
+                       third_p = &dev->ports[j];
+                       if (third_p->stp_state != BR_STATE_FORWARDING)
+                               continue;
+                       third_dp = dsa_to_port(ds, j);
+                       if (third_dp->bridge_dev == dp->bridge_dev)
+                               val |= BIT(j);
+               }
+
                dev->dev_ops->cfg_port_member(dev, i, val | cpu_port);
        }
 

--
2.20.1

Backported upstream commit 3d00827a90db6f79abc7cdc553887f89a2e0a184 to 5.16. Sorry about the subject; the MS webmail client doesn't seem allow me to change it when replying to a message :(

Svenning

________________________________________
Fra: Svenning Sørensen <[email protected]>
Sendt: 26. februar 2022 14:04
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Sv: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net: dsa: microchip: fix bridging with more than two member" failed to apply to 5.16-stable tree

Quoted 3 lines · gregkh@linuxfoundation wrote:
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

The patch below does not apply to the 5.16-stable tree. ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

Quoted 1 line

From 3d00827a90db6f79abc7cdc553887f89a2e0a184 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

...

Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line

That's strange - it applies just fine without errors here:

Try building it :)

Argh, yes, I should have thought of that - Sorry :)

It depended on another patch (implementing dsa_port_bridge_same()) which is not in the 5.16 tree.

I'll send a properly backported version (which has been both compiled and runtime tested) in a reply to this message; I hope this is a workable approach, as I'm not really familiar with your workflow.

Best regards,
Svenning Sørensen

________________________________________
Fra: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sendt: 26. februar 2022 08:38
Til: Svenning Sørensen
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Emne: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net: dsa: microchip: fix bridging with more than two member" failed to apply to 5.16-stable tree

Quoted 23 lines · Svenning Sørensen
Quoted 4 lines · gregkh@linuxfoundation wrote:
Quoted 4 lines

The patch below does not apply to the 5.16-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

...

Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

Quoted 1 line

From 3d00827a90db6f79abc7cdc553887f89a2e0a184 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

Hi Greg,

That's strange - it applies just fine without errors here:

--- snip ---

$ git log --oneline -n 1
f40e0f7a433b (HEAD -> linux-5.16.y, tag: v5.16.11, stable/linux-5.16.y) Linux 5.16.11
$ git cherry-pick -x 3d00827a90db6f79abc7cdc553887f89a2e0a184
[linux-5.16.y e1e17aca71a0] net: dsa: microchip: fix bridging with more than two member ports
 Date: Fri Feb 18 11:27:01 2022 +0000
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- snip ---
Quoted 1 line

So I'm not sure what's needed for backporting?

Try building it :)

author maintainer
#5 lore raw
Quoted 72 lines · Svenning Sørensen

Commit b3612ccdf284 ("net: dsa: microchip: implement multi-bridge support") plugged a packet leak between ports that were members of different bridges. Unfortunately, this broke another use case, namely that of more than two ports that are members of the same bridge.

After that commit, when a port is added to a bridge, hardware bridging between other member ports of that bridge will be cleared, preventing packet exchange between them.

Fix by ensuring that the Port VLAN Membership bitmap includes any existing ports in the bridge, not just the port being added.

Upstream commit 3d00827a90db6f79abc7cdc553887f89a2e0a184, backported to 5.16.

Fixes b3612ccdf284 ("net: dsa: microchip: implement multi-bridge support")
---
 drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c +23 -4
index 8a04302018dc..7ab9ab58de65 100644
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ void ksz_update_port_member(struct ksz_device *dev, int port)
        struct dsa_switch *ds = dev->ds;
        u8 port_member = 0, cpu_port;
        const struct dsa_port *dp;
-       int i;
+       int i, j;
 
        if (!dsa_is_user_port(ds, port))
                return;
@@ -45,13 +45,33 @@ void ksz_update_port_member(struct ksz_device *dev, int port)
                        continue;
                if (!dp->bridge_dev || dp->bridge_dev != other_dp->bridge_dev)
                        continue;
+               if (other_p->stp_state != BR_STATE_FORWARDING)
+                       continue;
 
-               if (other_p->stp_state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING &&
-                   p->stp_state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING) {
+               if (p->stp_state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING) {
                        val |= BIT(port);
                        port_member |= BIT(i);
                }
 
+               /* Retain port [i]'s relationship to other ports than [port] */
+               for (j = 0; j < ds->num_ports; j++) {
+                       const struct dsa_port *third_dp;
+                       struct ksz_port *third_p;
+
+                       if (j == i)
+                               continue;
+                       if (j == port)
+                               continue;
+                       if (!dsa_is_user_port(ds, j))
+                               continue;
+                       third_p = &dev->ports[j];
+                       if (third_p->stp_state != BR_STATE_FORWARDING)
+                               continue;
+                       third_dp = dsa_to_port(ds, j);
+                       if (third_dp->bridge_dev == dp->bridge_dev)
+                               val |= BIT(j);
+               }
+
                dev->dev_ops->cfg_port_member(dev, i, val | cpu_port);
        }
 
--
Quoted 2 lines

2.20.1

Patch is whitespace corrupted (tabs -> spaces) and can not be applied at all :(

Please fix up and resend.

thanks,

greg k-h