cpufreq: intel_pstate: Clean up frequency computations
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 cpufreq: intel_pstate: Clean up frequency computations
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Notice that some computations related to frequency in intel_pstate can be simplified if (a) intel_pstate_get_hwp_max() updates the relevant members of struct cpudata by itself and (b) the "turbo disabled" check is moved from it to its callers, so modify the code accordingly and while at it rename intel_pstate_get_hwp_max() to intel_pstate_get_hwp_cap() which better reflects its purpose and provide a simplified variat of it, __intel_pstate_get_hwp_cap(), suitable for the initialization path.
No intentional functional impact.
--- drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c +45 -56
@@ -819,19 +819,21 @@ static struct freq_attr *hwp_cpufreq_att NULL, }; -static void intel_pstate_get_hwp_max (struct cpudata *cpu,int *phy_max, -int *current_max) +static void __intel_pstate_get_hwp_cap (struct cpudata *cpu) {u64 cap;rdmsrl_on_cpu (cpu->cpu,MSR_HWP_CAPABILITIES , &cap);WRITE_ONCE (cpu->hwp_cap_cached, cap); -if (global.no_turbo || global.turbo_disabled) - *current_max =HWP_GUARANTEED_PERF (cap); -else - *current_max =HWP_HIGHEST_PERF (cap); + cpu->pstate.max_pstate =HWP_GUARANTEED_PERF (cap); + cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate =HWP_HIGHEST_PERF (cap); +} - *phy_max =HWP_HIGHEST_PERF (cap); +static void intel_pstate_get_hwp_cap (struct cpudata *cpu) +{ +__intel_pstate_get_hwp_cap (cpu); + cpu->pstate.max_freq = cpu->pstate.max_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling; + cpu->pstate.turbo_freq = cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling; }static void intel_pstate_hwp_set (unsigned int cpu)
@@ -1195,12 +1197,13 @@ static ssize_t store_no_turbo(struct kobstatic void update_qos_request (enum freq_qos_req_type type) { -int max_state, turbo_max, freq, i, perf_pct;struct freq_qos_request *req;struct cpufreq_policy *policy; +int i;for_each_possible_cpu (i) {struct cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[i]; +unsigned int freq, perf_pct; policy =cpufreq_cpu_get (i);if (!policy)
@@ -1213,9 +1216,7 @@ static void update_qos_request(enum freqcontinue ;if (hwp_active) -intel_pstate_get_hwp_max (cpu, &turbo_max, &max_state); -else - turbo_max = cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate; +intel_pstate_get_hwp_cap (cpu);if (type ==FREQ_QOS_MIN ) { perf_pct = global.min_perf_pct;
@@ -1224,8 +1225,7 @@ static void update_qos_request(enum freq perf_pct = global.max_perf_pct; } - freq =DIV_ROUND_UP (turbo_max * perf_pct,100 ); - freq *= cpu->pstate.scaling; + freq =DIV_ROUND_UP (cpu->pstate.turbo_freq * perf_pct,100 );if (freq_qos_update_request (req, freq) <0 )pr_warn ("Failed to update freq constraint: CPU%d\n" , i);
@@ -1715,21 +1715,17 @@ static void intel_pstate_get_cpu_pstates { cpu->pstate.min_pstate = pstate_funcs.get_min (); cpu->pstate.max_pstate_physical = pstate_funcs.get_max_physical (); - cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate = pstate_funcs.get_turbo (); cpu->pstate.scaling = pstate_funcs.get_scaling ();if (hwp_active && !hwp_mode_bdw) { -unsigned int phy_max, current_max; - -intel_pstate_get_hwp_max (cpu, &phy_max, ¤t_max); - cpu->pstate.turbo_freq = phy_max * cpu->pstate.scaling; - cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate = phy_max; - cpu->pstate.max_pstate =HWP_GUARANTEED_PERF (READ_ONCE (cpu->hwp_cap_cached)); +__intel_pstate_get_hwp_cap (cpu); }else { - cpu->pstate.turbo_freq = cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling; cpu->pstate.max_pstate = pstate_funcs.get_max (); + cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate = pstate_funcs.get_turbo (); } + cpu->pstate.max_freq = cpu->pstate.max_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling; + cpu->pstate.turbo_freq = cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling;if (pstate_funcs.get_aperf_mperf_shift) cpu->aperf_mperf_shift = pstate_funcs.get_aperf_mperf_shift ();
@@ -2204,18 +2200,21 @@ static void intel_pstate_update_perf_limint max_freq;/* -* HWP needs some special consideration, because on BDX the -* HWP_REQUEST uses abstract value to represent performance -* rather than pure ratios. +* HWP needs some special consideration, because HWP_REQUEST uses +* abstract values to represent performance rather than pure ratios. */ -if (hwp_active) { -intel_pstate_get_hwp_max (cpu, &turbo_max, &max_state); +if (hwp_active) +intel_pstate_get_hwp_cap (cpu); + +if (global.no_turbo || global.turbo_disabled) { + max_state = cpu->pstate.max_pstate; + max_freq = cpu->pstate.max_freq; }else { - max_state = global.no_turbo || global.turbo_disabled ? - cpu->pstate.max_pstate : cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate; - turbo_max = cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate; + max_state = cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate; + max_freq = cpu->pstate.turbo_freq; } - max_freq = max_state * cpu->pstate.scaling; + + turbo_max = cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate; max_policy_perf = max_state * policy_max / max_freq;if (policy_max == policy_min) {
@@ -2322,10 +2321,9 @@ static void intel_pstate_verify_cpu_poliupdate_turbo_state ();if (hwp_active) { -int max_state, turbo_max; - -intel_pstate_get_hwp_max (cpu, &turbo_max, &max_state); - max_freq = max_state * cpu->pstate.scaling; +intel_pstate_get_hwp_cap (cpu); + max_freq = global.no_turbo || global.turbo_disabled ? + cpu->pstate.max_freq : cpu->pstate.turbo_freq; }else { max_freq =intel_pstate_get_max_freq (cpu); }
@@ -2416,25 +2414,15 @@ static int __intel_pstate_cpu_init(struc cpu->max_perf_ratio =0xFF ; cpu->min_perf_ratio =0 ; - policy->min = cpu->pstate.min_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling; - policy->max = cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling; -/* cpuinfo and default policy values */ policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = cpu->pstate.min_pstate * cpu->pstate.scaling;update_turbo_state (); global.turbo_disabled_mf = global.turbo_disabled; policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = global.turbo_disabled ? - cpu->pstate.max_pstate : cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate; - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq *= cpu->pstate.scaling; - -if (hwp_active) { -unsigned int max_freq; - - max_freq = global.turbo_disabled ? cpu->pstate.max_freq : cpu->pstate.turbo_freq; -if (max_freq < policy->cpuinfo.max_freq) - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = max_freq; - } + + policy->min = policy->cpuinfo.min_freq; + policy->max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_limits (policy);
@@ -2683,10 +2671,10 @@ static void intel_cpufreq_adjust_perf(unstatic int intel_cpufreq_cpu_init (struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { -int max_state, turbo_max, min_freq, max_freq, ret;struct freq_qos_request *req;struct cpudata *cpu;struct device *dev; +int ret, freq; dev =get_cpu_device (policy->cpu);if (!dev)
@@ -2711,30 +2699,31 @@ static int intel_cpufreq_cpu_init(structif (hwp_active) {u64 value; -intel_pstate_get_hwp_max (cpu, &turbo_max, &max_state); policy->transition_delay_us =INTEL_CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_DELAY_HWP ; + +intel_pstate_get_hwp_cap (cpu); +rdmsrl_on_cpu (cpu->cpu,MSR_HWP_REQUEST , &value);WRITE_ONCE (cpu->hwp_req_cached, value); + cpu->epp_cached =intel_pstate_get_epp (cpu, value); }else { - turbo_max = cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate; policy->transition_delay_us =INTEL_CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_DELAY ; } - min_freq =DIV_ROUND_UP (turbo_max * global.min_perf_pct,100 ); - min_freq *= cpu->pstate.scaling; - max_freq =DIV_ROUND_UP (turbo_max * global.max_perf_pct,100 ); - max_freq *= cpu->pstate.scaling; + freq =DIV_ROUND_UP (cpu->pstate.turbo_freq * global.min_perf_pct,100 ); ret =freq_qos_add_request (&policy->constraints, req,FREQ_QOS_MIN , - min_freq); + freq);if (ret <0 ) {dev_err (dev,"Failed to add min-freq constraint (%d)\n" , ret); goto free_req; } + freq =DIV_ROUND_UP (cpu->pstate.turbo_freq * global.max_perf_pct,100 ); + ret =freq_qos_add_request (&policy->constraints, req +1 ,FREQ_QOS_MAX , - max_freq); + freq);if (ret <0 ) {dev_err (dev,"Failed to add max-freq constraint (%d)\n" , ret); goto remove_min_req;
Quoted 11 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Notice that some computations related to frequency in
intel_pstatecan be simplified if (a)intel_pstate_get_hwp_max()updates the relevant members of struct cpudata by itself and (b) the "turbo disabled" check is moved from it to its callers, so modify the code accordingly and while at it renameintel_pstate_get_hwp_max()tointel_pstate_get_hwp_cap()which better reflects its purpose and provide a simplified variat of it,__intel_pstate_get_hwp_cap(), suitable for the initialization path.
Quoted 3 lines
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
thanks,
Chenyu