Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/display/dp_mst: Handle old/new payload states in" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Mar 10, 2023

Subsystems (8)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x e761cc20946a0094df71cb31a565a6a0d03bd8be
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '[email protected]' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

e761cc20946a ("drm/display/dp_mst: Handle old/new payload states in drm_dp_remove_payload()") 9b2d019144a0 ("drm/display/dp_mst: Correct the kref of port.")
8c7d980da9ba ("drm/nouveau/disp: move DP MST payload config method") 8bb30c882334 ("drm/nouveau/disp: add method to trigger DP link retrain") 016dacb60e6d ("drm/nouveau/kms: pass event mask to hpd handler")
d62f8e982cb8 ("drm/nouveau/kms: switch hpd_lock from mutex to spinlock") a62b74939063 ("drm/nouveau/disp: add method to control DPAUX pad power") 813443721331 ("drm/nouveau/disp: move DP link config into acquire") a9f5d7721923 ("drm/nouveau/disp: move HDA ELD method")
f530bc60a30b ("drm/nouveau/disp: move HDMI config into acquire + infoframe methods") 9793083f1dd9 ("drm/nouveau/disp: move LVDS protocol information into acquire") ea6143a86c67 ("drm/nouveau/disp: move and extend the role of outp acquire/release methods")

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From e761cc20946a0094df71cb31a565a6a0d03bd8be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Imre Deak <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 13:48:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] drm/display/dp_mst: Handle old/new payload states in
drm_dp_remove_payload()
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Atm, drm_dp_remove_payload() uses the same payload state to both get the vc_start_slot required for the payload removal DPCD message and to deduct time_slots from vc_start_slot of all payloads after the one being removed.

The above isn't always correct, as vc_start_slot must be the up-to-date version contained in the new payload state, but time_slots must be the one used when the payload was previously added, contained in the old payload state. The new payload's time_slots can change vs. the old one if the current atomic commit changes the corresponding mode.

This patch let's drivers pass the old and new payload states to drm_dp_remove_payload(), but keeps these the same for now in all drivers not to change the behavior. A follow-up i915 patch will pass in that driver the correct old and new states to the function.

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c +1 -1
index a50319fc42b1..180d3893b68d 100644
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
 	if (enable)
 		drm_dp_add_payload_part1(mst_mgr, mst_state, payload);
 	else
-		drm_dp_remove_payload(mst_mgr, mst_state, payload);
+		drm_dp_remove_payload(mst_mgr, mst_state, payload, payload);
 
 	/* mst_mgr->->payloads are VC payload notify MST branch using DPCD or
 	 * AUX message. The sequence is slot 1-63 allocated sequence for each
drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +14 -12
index 847c10aa2098..1990ff5dc7dd 100644
@@ -3342,7 +3342,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_add_payload_part1);
  * drm_dp_remove_payload() - Remove an MST payload
  * @mgr: Manager to use.
  * @mst_state: The MST atomic state
- * @payload: The payload to write
+ * @old_payload: The payload with its old state
+ * @new_payload: The payload to write
  *
  * Removes a payload from an MST topology if it was successfully assigned a start slot. Also updates
  * the starting time slots of all other payloads which would have been shifted towards the start of
@@ -3350,36 +3351,37 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_add_payload_part1);
  */
 void drm_dp_remove_payload(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 			   struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state,
-			   struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload)
+			   const struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *old_payload,
+			   struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *new_payload)
 {
 	struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *pos;
 	bool send_remove = false;
 
 	/* We failed to make the payload, so nothing to do */
-	if (payload->vc_start_slot == -1)
+	if (new_payload->vc_start_slot == -1)
 		return;
 
 	mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
-	send_remove = drm_dp_mst_port_downstream_of_branch(payload->port, mgr->mst_primary);
+	send_remove = drm_dp_mst_port_downstream_of_branch(new_payload->port, mgr->mst_primary);
 	mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
 
 	if (send_remove)
-		drm_dp_destroy_payload_step1(mgr, mst_state, payload);
+		drm_dp_destroy_payload_step1(mgr, mst_state, new_payload);
 	else
 		drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev, "Payload for VCPI %d not in topology, not sending remove\n",
-			    payload->vcpi);
+			    new_payload->vcpi);
 
 	list_for_each_entry(pos, &mst_state->payloads, next) {
-		if (pos != payload && pos->vc_start_slot > payload->vc_start_slot)
-			pos->vc_start_slot -= payload->time_slots;
+		if (pos != new_payload && pos->vc_start_slot > new_payload->vc_start_slot)
+			pos->vc_start_slot -= old_payload->time_slots;
 	}
-	payload->vc_start_slot = -1;
+	new_payload->vc_start_slot = -1;
 
 	mgr->payload_count--;
-	mgr->next_start_slot -= payload->time_slots;
+	mgr->next_start_slot -= old_payload->time_slots;
 
-	if (payload->delete)
-		drm_dp_mst_put_port_malloc(payload->port);
+	if (new_payload->delete)
+		drm_dp_mst_put_port_malloc(new_payload->port);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_remove_payload);
 
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c +3 -1
index f3cb12dcfe0a..dc4e5ff1dbb3 100644
@@ -526,6 +526,8 @@ static void intel_mst_disable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 		to_intel_connector(old_conn_state->connector);
 	struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state =
 		drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(&state->base, &intel_dp->mst_mgr);
+	struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload =
+		drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(mst_state, connector->port);
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(connector->base.dev);
 
 	drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "active links %d\n",
@@ -534,7 +536,7 @@ static void intel_mst_disable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
 	intel_hdcp_disable(intel_mst->connector);
 
 	drm_dp_remove_payload(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, mst_state,
-			      drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(mst_state, connector->port));
+			      payload, payload);
 
 	intel_audio_codec_disable(encoder, old_crtc_state, old_conn_state);
 }
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c +1 -1
index edcb2529b402..ed9d374147b8 100644
@@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ nv50_msto_prepare(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
 
 	// TODO: Figure out if we want to do a better job of handling VCPI allocation failures here?
 	if (msto->disabled) {
-		drm_dp_remove_payload(mgr, mst_state, payload);
+		drm_dp_remove_payload(mgr, mst_state, payload, payload);
 
 		nvif_outp_dp_mst_vcpi(&mstm->outp->outp, msto->head->base.index, 0, 0, 0, 0);
 	} else {
include/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_helper.h +2 -1
index 41fd8352ab65..f5eb9aa152b1 100644
@@ -841,7 +841,8 @@ int drm_dp_add_payload_part2(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 			     struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload);
 void drm_dp_remove_payload(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
 			   struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state,
-			   struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload);
+			   const struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *old_payload,
+			   struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *new_payload);
 
 int drm_dp_check_act_status(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr);