SANE
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 6 lines
Brad Midgley <[email protected]> wrote
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
concluded that the problem was either with the scsi generic driver (sg), or with the scsi driver (53C94).
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
i remember paul saying something about no reconnect support back when we were trying to get cdrecord to work.
could someone with an adaptec scsi card try sane?
For what its worth, I have SANE 1.0.1 working without problems with R5 and kernel 2.2.10 which I compiled with the sg drivers. The machine is a rev1 G3 233 with a UMAX 610s on the internal scsi bus.
Brian
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
Quoted 3 lines · Brian C Burke
Quoted 3 lines
For what its worth, I have SANE 1.0.1 working without problems with R5 and kernel 2.2.10 which I compiled with the sg drivers. The machine is a rev1 G3 233 with a UMAX 610s on the internal scsi bus.
Great! I got a few questions for you!
Where did you take your kernel sources (vger, pmac, kernel.org)?
Did you take the stock sg drivers, or you compiled them from
http://www.torque.net/sg/?
Which scsi bus your scanner is using ( 53C94, mesh, Adaptec XXXX)? By 'internal', you mean built-in?
How many devices do you have on your scsi bus?
Thanks,
Simon
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]