Skip to contentSkip to conversation

R5000SC

DISCUSSION Randall Craig 2 participants 2 messages Oct 24, 2000 MIPS

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

I think from the faq that the R5000SC is not supported:
---Snip----
Not supported are R4000MC and R4400MC CPUs (that is multiprocessor systems) as well as R5000 systems with a CPU controlled second level cache. This means where the cache is controlled by the R5000 itself in contrast to some external external cache controller. The difference is important because, unlike other systems, especially PCs, on MIPS the cache is architecturally visible and needs to be controlled by software.
---Snap---

The machine seems seems to have Secondary unified cache. Could anyone confirm that this machine is not supported.

Here is some more info, I do not have access to the machine.

1 180 MHZ IP22 Processor
FPU: MIPS R5000 Floating Point Coprocessor Revision: 1.0
CPU: MIPS R5000 Processor Chip Revision: 2.1 On-board serial ports: 2
On-board bi-directional parallel port
Data cache size: 32 Kbytes
Instruction cache size: 32 Kbytes
Secondary unified instruction/data cache size: 512 Kbytes on Processor 0

Signature · 5 lines
Randall H. Craig
SuSE Inc.,                 Tel:   +1-510-628-3380 (ext. 5004)
580 Second St., Suite 210  Fax:   +1-510-835-3381
Oakland CA 94607           Email: [email protected]
USA                        WWW:   http://www.suse.com
#1 lore raw
Quoted 2 lines · Randall Craig

The machine seems seems to have Secondary unified cache. Could anyone confirm that this machine is not supported.

Even without Secondary Cache there are problems with R5000.

Quoted 3 lines

1 180 MHZ IP22 Processor
FPU: MIPS R5000 Floating Point Coprocessor Revision: 1.0
CPU: MIPS R5000 Processor Chip Revision: 2.1

I got a 150Mhz IP22 (Indy) without secondary cache and i see very strange things happen with 2.4.0-test9 (2.2.14 was reported to work)

Flo

Signature · 2 lines
Florian Lohoff		[email protected]		      	+49-5201-669912
      "Write only memory - Oops. Time for my medication again ..."