Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Linux 2.2.18pre25

DISCUSSION willy tarreau 2 participants 2 messages Dec 8, 2000

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw
Quoted 1 line

It doesnt even apply

sorry Alan, I think it's because I had to copy/paste it
with my mouse under X into my browser (I don't have smtp access here at work), and it applies here with a -12 lines offset...

Here it is attached for 2.2.18pre25, but since the raid
server is running now (under 2.2.18pre20+patch), I won't be able to test it till next week, but I'm a bit confident since it will do the same as the one which currently allows this server to boot.

as soon as I can reboot it, I promise I will test the kernel with and without the patch to be really sure. but before that, if people who have problems with megaraid/netraid could give it a try, that would be cool. Also, it would be nice if people for which the normal megaraid driver works would accept to check this
doesn't break anything.

Regards,
Willy

___________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? -- Pour dialoguer en direct avec vos amis, Yahoo! Messenger : http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com

#1 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines

as soon as I can reboot it, I promise I will test the kernel with and without the patch to be really sure. but before that, if people who have problems with megaraid/netraid could give it a try, that would be cool. Also, it would be nice if people for which the normal megaraid driver works would accept to check this
doesn't break anything.

Your patch changes the mask on both IO and memory ports to be MEM mask, which is obviously incorrect. It wont actually bite you because all the masking has already been done by pci_resource_start() so you are masking already zero bits.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/