Skip to contentSkip to conversation

storage over IP (was Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch,

DISCUSSION Cacophonix 1 participant 1 message Jan 10, 2001

lore
Share & tools
lore

Cacophonix

author
#0 lore raw

I haven't tracked the IP storage group too closely, but was at the San Diego IETF where there were some interesting debates about this issue.

There is a write-up at http://ips.pdl.cs.cmu.edu/mail/msg02598.html

Now I'm not sure if I agree with some of the assumptions. And I share your concern about using multiple tcp streams.

Thoughts?

cheers,
karthik

Quoted 10 lines · --- Alan Cox
Quoted 3 lines

<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ips-fcovertcpip-01.txt>
show that both use TCP/IP. TCP/IP has variable length headers (or am i on crack?), which totally complicates the receive path.

TCP has variable length headers. It also prevents you re-ordering commands in the stream which would be beneficial. I've not checked if the draft uses multiple TCP streams but then you have scaling questions.

Alan

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
http://photos.yahoo.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/