Desk check of raid5.c patch from [email protected]?
I've been following the recent 2.4.1-pre series and am wondering why the following one-liner (obviously correct) patch has not been applied. Maybe the original request from Neil to Linus did not get through?
<http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-raid&m=97936073620401&w=2>
md/raid5.c 2001/01/13 04:31:30 renamed from md/raid5.c 2001/01/13 04:31:15 1.1 +1 -1
@@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@ bh->b_end_io(bh, 1); } while ((bh=return_fail)) { - return_ok = bh->b_reqnext; + return_fail = bh->b_reqnext; bh->b_reqnext = NULL; bh->b_end_io(bh, 0); }
------------------------------------------------------------
--== Sent via Deja.com ==--
http://www.deja.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
md/raid5.c 2001/01/13 04:31:30 line 1074
Quoted 6 lines · Quim K Holland
I've been following the recent 2.4.1-pre series and am wondering why the following one-liner (obviously correct) patch has not been applied. [...]
md/raid5.c 2001/01/13 04:31:30 renamed from md/raid5.c 2001/01/13 04:31:15 1.1 +1
-1- return_ok = bh->b_reqnext; + return_fail = bh->b_reqnext;
oops - i do have it in my tree, somehow it escaped.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/