Skip to contentSkip to conversation

eepro100 on IBM Walnut board,

DISCUSSION Torben Mathiasen 5 participants 5 messages Apr 5, 2001 – Apr 6, 2001

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi,

Has anyone tried using an Intel i82559 NIC as a second adapter with an IBM Walnut board? I'm using the eepro100 driver with the montavista distribution (tried 2.4.0-test2 and 2.4.2) and the driver just keeps printing: wait_for_cmd_timeout. The NIC won't send any frames, and no interrupts are generated.

The docs claim that the eepro100 driver should work.

Thanks in advance,

Torben

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

#1 lore raw

The latest eepro has serious endian-ness problems. PPC and MIPS suffer this problem.

} Has anyone tried using an Intel i82559 NIC as a second adapter with an IBM Walnut board? I'm using the eepro100 driver } with the montavista distribution (tried 2.4.0-test2 and 2.4.2) and the driver just keeps printing: wait_for_cmd_timeout. } The NIC won't send any frames, and no interrupts are generated.
}
} The docs claim that the eepro100 driver should work.

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

#4 lore raw
In reply to Torben Mathiasen

We've been using the Intel-supplied driver

http://support.intel.com/support/network/adapter/pro100/30504.htm

with an MPC8240. We've noticed that the driver in all current kernels is "problematic", at best, even on x86 (there used to be a usable one, but I haven't seen it in any tree, lately).

Hope this helps.

Quoted 7 lines · Torben Mathiasen

Hi,

Has anyone tried using an Intel i82559 NIC as a second adapter with an IBM Walnut board? I'm using the eepro100 driver with the montavista distribution (tried 2.4.0-test2 and 2.4.2) and the driver just keeps printing: wait_for_cmd_timeout. The NIC won't send any frames, and no interrupts are generated.

Quoted 6 lines

The docs claim that the eepro100 driver should work.

Thanks in advance,

Torben

--
[email protected]

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

#2 lore raw
In reply to Cort Dougan

Didn't have endian problems in the version we're using on our PPC 8240 board. The version string says: eepro100.c:v1.09j 7/27/99 Donald Becker.......etc. I had problems with newer versions, I think endian issues were one of the them.

Ron

Quoted 14 lines

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Cort Dougan
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 1:33 PM
To: Torben Mathiasen
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: eepro100 on IBM Walnut board,

The latest eepro has serious endian-ness problems. PPC and MIPS suffer this problem.

Quoted 9 lines

} Has anyone tried using an Intel i82559 NIC as a second adapter with an IBM Walnut board? I'm using the eepro100 driver
} with the montavista distribution (tried 2.4.0-test2 and 2.4.2) and the driver just keeps printing:
wait_for_cmd_timeout.
} The NIC won't send any frames, and no interrupts are generated.
}
} The docs claim that the eepro100 driver should work.

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

#3 lore raw
In reply to Cort Dougan
Quoted 3 lines · Cort Dougan

The latest eepro has serious endian-ness problems. PPC and MIPS suffer this problem.

I'm using the following version (stock 2.4.2) on ten different PPC platforms (603e, 750's, 8240's):

static const char *version =
"eepro100.c:v1.09j-t 9/29/99 Donald Becker http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/dri
vers/eepro100.html\n"
"eepro100.c: $Revision: 1.36 $ 2000/11/17 Modified by Andrey V. Savochkin <saw@s aw.sw.com.sg> and others\n";

--
Matt Porter
MontaVista Software, Inc.
[email protected]

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/