Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Single user linux

PATCH Rick Hohensee 2 participants 2 messages Apr 25, 2001

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw
Quoted 3 lines · [email protected] wrote:

for those who didn't read that patch, i #define capable(), suser(), and fsuser() to 1. the implication is all users will have root capabilities.

How is that not single user?

I have been doing single-user oriented Linux/GNU/unix longer than anyone I'm aware of with exactly that focus. The one trivial patch I do to the kernel disgusts the core Linux developers for reasons unrelated to single user. cLIeNUX boots with 12 vt's logging in already as root. No kernel molestation. (But stay tuned ;o) Rather than me contributing further to the topic-skew, please have a browse at

www.clienux.com

Rick Hohensee
cLIeNUX user 0

#1 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · Rick Hohensee
Quoted 3 lines · [email protected] wrote:

for those who didn't read that patch, i #define capable(), suser(), and fsuser() to 1. the implication is all users will have root capabilities.

How is that not single user?

Every user still has it's own account, means profile etc.

Gruß,
Markus

Signature · 4 lines
| Gluecklich ist, wer vergisst, was nicht aus ihm geworden ist.
+---------------------------------------.     ,---------------->
http://www.uni-ulm.de/~s_mschab/         \   /
mailto:[email protected]  \_/