tty->name conversion?
I noticed that ps still relies on device numbers to determine tty, since /proc/*/stat only exports the device number. Is there any way to get the device name? I noticed that it is not present in tty_struct anywhere (proc_pid_stat() uses task->tty->device, which is a kdev_t).
This would be useful to consider if we ever intend to create real unnumbered character/block devices.
Signature · 4 lines
Taral <[email protected]> (This message is digitally signed. Please encrypt mail if possible.) "Any technology, no matter how primitive, is magic to those who don't understand it." -- Florence Ambrose
Quoted 7 lines · Taral
I noticed that ps still relies on device numbers to determine tty, since
/proc/*/statonly exports the device number. Is there any way to get the device name? I noticed that it is not present intty_structanywhere (proc_pid_stat()usestask->tty->device, which is akdev_t).This would be useful to consider if we ever intend to create real unnumbered character/block devices.
This isn't quite true, at least for the version shipped with Debian.
The non-existant /proc/*/tty link is examined first. This is because several people have agreed that such a link would be good, even though it is difficult to implement with the current code. I think viro, hpa, and tytso have all looked into this.
The ps code also looks at /proc/*/fd/* when possible. This often gives a real filename. Otherwise, ps has to guess a name based on the device number and either a hard-coded table or information from /proc/tty/drivers.
Quoted 11 lines · Albert D. Cahalan
Quoted 7 lines · Taral
I noticed that ps still relies on device numbers to determine tty, since
/proc/*/statonly exports the device number. Is there any way to get the device name? I noticed that it is not present intty_structanywhere (proc_pid_stat()usestask->tty->device, which is akdev_t).This would be useful to consider if we ever intend to create real unnumbered character/block devices.
This isn't quite true, at least for the version shipped with Debian.
<snip>
Thanks for your reply. It still remains, however, that for processes that you do not own, it has to guess, viz:
319 taral vc/1 S Jul12 -zsh 320 root tty2 S Jul12 /sbin/getty 38400 vc/2
Notice that the getty is listed as tty2, even though it opened /dev/vc/2.
Signature · 4 lines
Taral <[email protected]> This message is digitally signed. Please PGP encrypt mail to me. "Any technology, no matter how primitive, is magic to those who don't understand it." -- Florence Ambrose