Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Linux 2.4.8-ac10

DISCUSSION Chris Meadors 1 participant 1 message Aug 24, 2001 1 message not in the archive

lore
Share & tools
lore

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#1 lore raw

I hope you don't mind if I post this to l-k so Alan (and everyone), can see (what a fool I am).

Quoted 1 line · Pete Zaitcev

Curious. Did you keep the dmesg and ksymoops output?

I didn't, but they probally aren't important at this point. I got 2.4.8-ac10 to boot. I was going to build a kernel that oopsed, so I went to reverse off the -ac10 patch, but patch asked me to ignore the -R. I was like, crap, I just build a plain 2.4.8. No wonder it wouldn't boot, I didn't have ext2 built in.

Sorry for your time, and thanks for making me think this through again.

I'll repeat, 2.4.8-ac10 is cool for me now.

(And I got the college dorms online, that have been distracting me all week, so I can think straight again. :)

-Chris

Signature · 3 lines
Two penguins were walking on an iceberg.  The first penguin said to the
second, "you look like you are wearing a tuxedo."  The second penguin
said, "I might be..."                         --David Lynch, Twin Peaks