Skip to contentSkip to conversation

2.4.10-pre12 sysrq.c compile error

DISCUSSION MATSUURA Takanori 3 participants 7 messages Sep 20, 2001 – Sep 21, 2001 1 message not in the archive

lore
Share & tools
lore

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#1 lore raw

From: [email protected]
Subject: Linux PPC Developer Digest V34 #19
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 00:00:59 -0500

Quoted 6 lines

Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 17:34:26 -0400
From: Stefan Jeglinski <[email protected]>
Subject: 2.4.10-pre12 sysrq.c compile error

rsynced mvista today, linuxppc_2_4:

Quoted 10 lines

sysrq.c:35: conflicting types for wakeup_bdflush' /usr/src/linuxppc_2_4/include/linux/fs.h:1347: previous declaration of wakeup_bdflush'
make[3]: *** [sysrq.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linuxppc_2_4/drivers/char' make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linuxppc_2_4/drivers/char' make[1]: *** [_subdir_char] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linuxppc_2_4/drivers'
make: *** [_dir_drivers] Error 2

`wakeup_bdflush' was defines in two defrent files.

linuxppc_2_4_devel/drivers/char/sysrq.c (line: 35) extern void wakeup_bdflush(int);

linuxppc_2_4_devel/include/linux/fs.h (line: 1347) extern void wakeup_bdflush(void);

MATSUURA Takanori @ Division of Protein Chemistry,
Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University, Japan
E-Mail: [email protected]
Web Page: http://chux1.protein.osaka-u.ac.jp/~t-matsuu/

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

#2 lore raw

From: MATSUURA Takanori <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 8 lines

of `wakeup_bdflush'
make[3]: *** [sysrq.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linuxppc_2_4/drivers/char' make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linuxppc_2_4/drivers/char' make[1]: *** [_subdir_char] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linuxppc_2_4/drivers'
make: *** [_dir_drivers] Error 2

Quoted 8 lines

`wakeup_bdflush' was defines in two defrent files.

linuxppc_2_4_devel/drivers/char/sysrq.c (line: 35) extern void wakeup_bdflush(int);

linuxppc_2_4_devel/include/linux/fs.h (line: 1347) extern void wakeup_bdflush(void);

if it's same extern , it's no problem.
Different paramenter is no good.

Kaoru

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

#3 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines

`wakeup_bdflush' was defines in two defrent files.

linuxppc_2_4_devel/drivers/char/sysrq.c (line: 35)
extern void wakeup_bdflush(int);

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

linuxppc_2_4_devel/include/linux/fs.h (line: 1347) extern void wakeup_bdflush(void);

if it's same extern , it's no problem.
Different paramenter is no good.

Right. I should have supplied more info about what I have tried.

I attempted to make everything consistent each way. IOW, I have made the function definition and extern declarations all with a void argument, and also all with an int argument. In one case, the compiler error is "too many arguments in wakeup_bdflush" and in the other case the compiler error is "too few arguments in wakeup_bdflush".

I have noted numerous instances of wakeup_bdflush() and wakeup_bdflush(0) but I'm not sure this is an issue.

There's an inconsistency here that first appeared straightforward to me but now I'm not sure of the changes that are needed.

I rsynced this morning but still the same result.

Stefan Jeglinski

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

#4 lore raw
Quoted 3 lines

There's an inconsistency here that first appeared straightforward to me but now I'm not sure of the changes that are needed.

Sorry, I should note that to build this kernel I'm using gcc-2.95.2-1i and accompanying parts (and I have glibc-2.1.3-5a, but I would think that irrelevant). Could the compiler be an issue?

Stefan Jeglinski

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

#5 lore raw
In reply to Stefan Jeglinski

From: Stefan Jeglinski <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 2.4.10-pre12 sysrq.c compile error
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:52:13 -0400

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines

`wakeup_bdflush' was defines in two defrent files.

linuxppc_2_4_devel/drivers/char/sysrq.c (line: 35)
extern void wakeup_bdflush(int);

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

linuxppc_2_4_devel/include/linux/fs.h (line: 1347) extern void wakeup_bdflush(void);

if it's same extern , it's no problem.
Different paramenter is no good.

Right. I should have supplied more info about what I have tried.

Look at fs/buffer.c line2748 where the real function is in. so That is void wakeup_bdflush(void)

Kaoru

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

#6 lore raw
In reply to Stefan Jeglinski

From: Stefan Jeglinski <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 2.4.10-pre12 sysrq.c compile error
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:52:13 -0400

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines

`wakeup_bdflush' was defines in two defrent files.

linuxppc_2_4_devel/drivers/char/sysrq.c (line: 35)
extern void wakeup_bdflush(int);

change to extern void wakeup_bdflush(void);

Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines

linuxppc_2_4_devel/include/linux/fs.h (line: 1347) extern void wakeup_bdflush(void);

if it's same extern , it's no problem.
Different paramenter is no good.

I have noted numerous instances of wakeup_bdflush() and

wakeup_bdflush() is correct.

Kaoru

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

#7 lore raw

Re: 2.4.10-pre12 sysrq.c compile error (solved)

Thanks, Kaoru!

Sorry, no patch yet. I'll do one if my next rsync doesn't have it fixed :-)

All extern declarations should be

	extern void wakeup_bdflush(void);

definition should be:

	void wakeup_bdflush(void);

and all calls should be:

	wakeup_bdflush();

Stefan Jeglinski

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/