changelogs for 2.4.17rc2aa2 and 2.2.20aa1
I put together these pages to help others understand what is in Andrea's kernels a little better.
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/2.4.17rc2aa2.html
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/2.2.20aa1.html
The pages are created from his patch diff logs.
I've stress tested and benchmarked 2.4.17rc2aa2 a lot and it's been very solid. For a workload that creates a lot of processes 2.4.17rc2aa2 has a definite edge. This is easiest to see in a couple unixbench tests:
2.4.17-mjc1 2.4.17rc2aa2 2.5.1-dj10
System Call Overhead 352361.7 362120.5 255809.4 lps
Process Creation 817.5 2037.7 1212.0 lps
Execl Throughput 265.8 458.4 316.5 lps
And lmbench; the highest and lowest results of 3 runs were dropped.
Processor, Processes - times in microseconds - smaller is better
----------------------------------------------------------------
OS fork exec sh
proc proc proc
------------ ---- ---- ----
2.4.17rc2aa2 745 2769 9583
2.5.1-dj10 810 3504 11.K
2.4.17-mjc1 1128 4244 12.K
Good stuff comes from a lot of sources, and I'm hoping some of the tree maintainers will start cherry picking from Andrea's tree too. :)
Note: mjc1 above was configured without preempt, rtsched or lockbreak.
2.4.17rc2aa2 consistently does better at dbench too. More results are at:
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/repo.html
Signature · 1 line
Randy Hron
Quoted 2 lines · On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 [email protected] wrote:
More results are at:
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/repo.html
Consider it bookmarked 8)
I hope you can find the time to keep up these tests, as they should start to show some even more interesting results as the various trees progress.
Signature · 2 lines
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs
Quoted 9 lines · Dave Jones
Quoted 2 lines · On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 [email protected] wrote:
More results are at:
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/repo.htmlConsider it bookmarked 8)
I hope you can find the time to keep up these tests, as they should start to show some even more interesting results as the various trees progress.
I'll second that, very nice that someone takes the time to do this.
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe