Skip to contentSkip to conversation

C undefined behavior fix

PATCH mike stump 1 participant 1 message Jan 6, 2002

lore
Share & tools
lore

mike stump

author
#0 lore raw
Quoted 10 lines

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 08:05:56 -0500 (EST)

If you have a memory mapped byte, you really want a way of saying "when I read this byte, do a byte read, it will not work to do a word read"

(volatile gets close in C, but is not close enough) will ensure a byte store in practice, but may not ensure byte reads.

? Do you have an example where this fails? Do you not consider it a bug? Now, I would place a fair amount of buren on the compiler to get it right, though, this isn't absolute. For example, eieieio or whatever it is called on the powerpc. I think the chip/OS/MMU must bear some responsibility for meeting its obligations to the compiler, and if it doesn't, then that chip/OS/MMU fails to provide a reasonable base on which to provide the compiler. Did you have this case in mind?