spelling mistakes
PATCH 1/1 spelling mistakes
Fixes a few spelling mistakes in documentation (arch/i386/boot/setup.S, Documentation/sysrq.txt). Pretty boring. This is against 2.4.19-pre7, but also applies to 2.5.9.
Thanks.
Rob.
Documentation/sysrq.txt +1 -1
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ and 4 functions are exported for interface to it: __sysrq_lock_table, __sysrq_unlock_table, __sysrq_get_key_op, and __sysrq_put_key_op. The functions __sysrq_swap_key_ops and __sysrq_swap_key_ops_nolock are defined -in the header itself, and the REGISTER and UNREGISTER macros are built fromi +in the header itself, and the REGISTER and UNREGISTER macros are built from these. More complex (and dangerous!) manipulations of the table are possible using these functions, but you must be careful to always lock the table before you read or write from it, and to unlock it again when you are done. (And of
arch/i386/boot/setup.S +1 -1
@@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ # # but we yet haven't reloaded the CS register, so the default size # of the target offset still is 16 bit. -# However, using an operant prefix (0x66), the CPU will properly +# However, using an operand prefix (0x66), the CPU will properly # take our 48 bit far pointer. (INTeL 80386 Programmer's Reference # Manual, Mixing 16-bit and 32-bit code, page 16-6)
Quoted 6 lines · On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 15:50:52 -0400 [email protected] wrote:
Fixes a few spelling mistakes in documentation (
arch/i386/boot/setup.S,Documentation/sysrq.txt). Pretty boring. This is against 2.4.19-pre7, but also applies to 2.5.9.Thanks.
Rob.
You might want to send each of these individually to the Trivial Patch Monkey, for tracking and retransmission:
trivial at rustcorp.com.au
Thanks,
Rusty.
Signature · 2 lines
there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too many doers quoting their contemporaries. -- Larry McVoy