2.5.21 IDE 91
Quoted 4 lines
When the IDE carnage first started back circa 2.5.3, I had contemplated not merging *any* of the IDE patches, just so that people who want to work on other areas could have something solid to build upon. I regret not following through on that instinct.
I give the -dj series a vote of "good taste". In my testing they have
been reliable. Recently, 2.5.20-dj[34] completed all my tests, whereas
2.5.{19,20,21} haven't. I realize breakage in the development series
is expected and sometimes good. Nonetheless, "two thumbs up" for -dj.
Signature · 1 line
Randy Hron
Quoted 9 lines · On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 07:41:06AM -0400, [email protected] wrote:
Quoted 4 lines
When the IDE carnage first started back circa 2.5.3, I had contemplated not merging *any* of the IDE patches, just so that people who want to work on other areas could have something solid to build upon. I regret not following through on that instinct.
I give the -dj series a vote of "good taste". In my testing they have
been reliable. Recently, 2.5.20-dj[34] completed all my tests, whereas
2.5.{19,20,21} haven't. I realize breakage in the development series
is expected and sometimes good. Nonetheless, "two thumbs up" for -dj.
That's interesting. What exactly was failing ? It'd be in everyones interests to get those bits pushed to Linus sooner.
Dave.
Signature · 2 lines
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs