Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Please use the 'usbfs' filetype instead

DISCUSSION Greg KH 1 participant 1 message Dec 20, 2002 3 messages not in the archive

lore
Share & tools
lore

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): Pine.LNX.4.43.0212201417500.2382-100000@morpheus

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

Greg KH

author
#3 lore raw

Copied to lkml for others to refer to once 2.5.53 comes out...

Quoted 10 lines · Burton Windle

Hello. I'm getting this message once per bootup, but I can't figure out why.

uhci-hcd 00:07.2: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4
uhci-hcd 00:07.2: irq 11, io base 0000cce0
Please use the 'usbfs' filetype instead, the 'usbdevfs' name is depreciated. drivers/usb/core/hcd.c: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1 hub 1-0:0: USB hub found
hub 1-0:0: 2 ports detected

Quoted 6 lines

I see this change just started in 2.5.52-bk4. My /etc/fstab doesn't have usbdevfs, it has usbfs.

I've grepped my entire /etc, and don't find any references to 'usbdevfs'. Is this a warning about the kernel using it, or user-space using that name? Can you offer a clue where I might find this, and correct it?

Is this a Red Hat machine?
If so, look in /etc/rc.sysinit. That's where Red Hat mounts usbdevfs.

For a Debian box, it's done in /etc/hotplug/usb.rc. I don't know where the other distros do this, but it's probably one of the above two places.

Don't worry, the usbdevfs name will stick around and work through 2.6, I'm just trying to warn people that it will go away in 2.7.

Also, more recent 2.4 kernels support the usbfs name, if you want to change the rc.sysinit file and not worry about it anymore.

Hope this helps,

greg k-h