binfmt_elf::create_elf_tables changes u_platform without refill
Subsystems (2)
Hi all...
I thing I found a bug in 2.4 (and someone should check if this applies to 2.5 also...). In short, when running on an HT box, create_elf_tables() changes u_platform pointer (to separate stacks and avoid cache wars), without copy_to_user'ing again.
Current code:
if (k_platform) {
platform_len = strlen(k_platform) + 1;
u_platform = p - platform_len;
__copy_to_user(u_platform, k_platform, platform_len);
} else...
#if defined(__i386__) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
if(smp_num_siblings > 1)
u_platform = u_platform - ((current->pid % 64) << 7);
///// So original u_platform with data is lost !!! #endif
...
sp = (elf_addr_t *)(~15UL & (unsigned long)(u_platform)); // Set stack
...
if (k_platform) {
sp -= 2;
NEW_AUX_ENT(0, AT_PLATFORM, (elf_addr_t)(unsigned long) u_platform);
///// What the h**l is copied here after changing u_platform ???
}Patch below (use an independent stack_top). Boots and works on my dual Xeon, and glibc behaves correctly:
fs/binfmt_elf.c renamed from fs/binfmt_elf.c.orig +7 -5
@@ -116,11 +116,14 @@elf_caddr_t *argv;elf_caddr_t *envp;elf_addr_t *sp, *csp; +char *stack_top;char *k_platform, *u_platform;long hwcap;size_t platform_len =0 ;size_t len; + stack_top = p; +/* * Get hold of platform and hardware capabilities masks for * the machine we are running on. In some cases (Sparc),
@@ -135,8 +138,8 @@ platform_len =strlen (k_platform) +1 ; u_platform = p - platform_len;__copy_to_user (u_platform, k_platform, platform_len); - }else - u_platform = p; + stack_top = u_platform; + }#if defined(__i386__) && defined(CONFIG_SMP )/*
@@ -149,15 +152,14 @@* processors. This keeps Mr Marcelo Person happier but should be * removed for 2.5 */ -if (smp_num_siblings >1 ) - u_platform = u_platform - ((current->pid %64 ) <<7 ); + stack_top -= ((current->pid %64 ) <<7 );#endif /* * Force 16 byte _final_ alignment here for generality. */ - sp = (elf_addr_t *)(~15UL & (unsigned long )(u_platform)); + sp = (elf_addr_t *)(~15UL & (unsigned long )(stack_top)); csp = sp; csp -= (1 +DLINFO_ITEMS )*2 + (k_platform ?2 :0 );#ifdef DLINFO_ARCH_ITEMS
One question: why the 64 value ? Because linux supports 64 processors ? Why not just 2, because you have two siblings at most ?
TIA
Signature · 4 lines
J.A. Magallon <[email protected]> \ Software is like sex: werewolf.able.es \ It's better when it's free Mandrake Linux release 9.1 (Cooker) for i586 Linux 2.4.21-pre2-jam1 (gcc 3.2.1 (Mandrake Linux 9.1 3.2.1-2mdk))
Quoted 2 lines · On 2002.12.28 J.A. Magallon wrote:
Hi all...
[...]
Quoted 6 lines
#if
defined(__i386__)&&defined(CONFIG_SMP)
if(smp_num_siblings > 1)
u_platform=u_platform- ((current->pid% 64) << 7);
///// So originalu_platformwith data is lost !!! #endif
...
[...]
Quoted 4 lines
One question: why the 64 value ? Because linux supports 64 processors ? Why not just 2, because you have two siblings at most ?
Better, shouldn't this be NR_CPUS ? So you save half stack space on ia32, or even more with CONFIG_NR_CPUS...
Signature · 4 lines
J.A. Magallon <[email protected]> \ Software is like sex: werewolf.able.es \ It's better when it's free Mandrake Linux release 9.1 (Cooker) for i586 Linux 2.4.21-pre2-jam1 (gcc 3.2.1 (Mandrake Linux 9.1 3.2.1-2mdk))