PATCH: module_text_address() defined but not used in module.h
module_text_address() is defined as 'static int ...' if modules are not configured in in module.h, leading to a compiler warning that it is defined but not used. Make it static inline. Patch against 2.5.54-bk.
# This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project:
# Project Name: Linux kernel tree
# This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher. # This patch includes the following deltas:
# ChangeSet 1.975 -> 1.976
# include/linux/module.h 1.35 -> 1.36
#
# The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
# --------------------------------------------
# 03/01/07 [email protected] 1.976
# fix 'defined but not used' warning # -------------------------------------------- # diff -Nru a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h --- a/include/linux/module.h Tue Jan 7 14:18:37 2003 +++ b/include/linux/module.h Tue Jan 7 14:18:37 2003 @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ }
/* Is this address in a module? */
-static int module_text_address(unsigned long addr) +static inline int module_text_address(unsigned long addr)
{
return 0;
}
Signature · 4 lines
Muli Ben-Yehuda my opinions may seem crazy. But they all make sense. Insane sense, but sense nontheless. -- Shlomi Fish on #offtopic.
In message <20030107131243.GJ25540@alhambra> you write:
Quoted 4 lines
module_text_address()is defined as 'static int ...' if modules are not configured in inmodule.h, leading to a compiler warning that it is defined but not used. Make it static inline. Patch against 2.5.54-bk.
Linus, please apply. Obviously correct, my mistake.
From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <[email protected]>
include/linux/module.h +1 -1
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ }/* Is this address in a module? */ -static int module_text_address (unsigned long addr) +static inline int module_text_address (unsigned long addr) {return 0 ; }
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.