Skip to contentSkip to conversation

any chance of 2.6.0-test*?

DISCUSSION Kai Henningsen 1 participant 1 message Jan 18, 2003 3 messages not in the archive

lore
Share & tools
lore

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#3 lore raw

[email protected] (Emiliano Gabrielli) wrote on 13.01.03 in <[email protected]>:

Quoted 10 lines · Rob Wilkens
Quoted 7 lines

It only goes to show that the core of computer science hasn't changed over the years. While some technology changes, the science itself stays the same. Much like a physicist should know the outdated theories of relativity by Albert Einstein (made way back in the 20th century as well) a good computer scientist should appreciate the contributions of its founders, and have a good grasp of their core contributions. I'm not claiming to be an expert in either field, however.

You think Relativity is outdated ?!? I can't beleave !

I seem to recall that there are some areas in the world (carefully not naming any examples here) where some religious extremists have managed to sabotage public education, especially the sciences. If he's a victim of those guys, that would explain a lot (and shift some part of the blame elsewhere) ...

MfG Kai